Search results

For strange reasons Navy didn’t wanted more submarines and has fetish for nuclear super career but MoD tried to force submarines on IN at the expense of super career hence navy agreed for replica of Vikrant keeping their super career still ON. This is same like IAF fetish for MMRCA. Both MMRCA...

Whatever it is 3rd AC will be named Vishal

Navy should seriously concentrate on building submarine fleet. For the coastal length we have our sub fleet is shame. We need a formidable submarine fleet by 2040. 2 ACs are enough as we are not going out of Indian Ocean for war.

Navy is planning to lease FA-18 super hornet. TEDBF is still on paper with initial design yet to be frozen

Good decision.... We need more number of subs and ships to get foothold of Indian Ocean. Vikky and Vikrant are enough now and Vishal can be planned later after 2040

The difference is army/IAF is infested with Dallals and the dallals hold prominent position to influence decision makers and kickbacks. Eliminate these dallals by some percent we will progress whole together

Navy doesn't want another Vikrant or VikramAditya... Navy want glorious super carrier 65k ton atleast if not nuclear carrier to be effective beyond 2050-2060

How are we going to counter china?? This exact question was asked by a journalist to ex navy chief wrt to Chinese Building aircraft carriers who retired recently and he gave beautiful explanation... His answer was simple IN has an edge in operating aircraft carrier over 4 decades now. Certainly...