Search results

They need to have helicopters to check them first and provide feedback. That's why limited lsp is started. Once they go for its trial in varied condition only then they will be able to provide feedback. And what they want is different from what HAL can produce or provide. That's why the...

You know something ? That's why your half baked stuff were exposed? 😂😂 And again trying to divert what ? It was abt LUH not good enough alone... And Ka 226 T a better option that we need . It is you throwing stuff from here and there when unable to counter. I have multiple times mentioned...

Kicking ? Ohh you poor kid must have been bullied hard in school so trying to be an internet warrior 😂😂😂😂 Since you don't know shit abt anything... Here you go... Mig 29 k weren't meant for sea operation nor its frame was designed for that Not to forget it's not russia fault if HAL get cheap...

Even primary class student got more brain , class and argument than your repetitive rhetoric. Buying HAL product.... To be equated with buying Ka 226 T as part of same political compulsion is literal stupid. Russia doesn't own us and can't certainly force us to not use our own product...

Lol by who ? Yeah lfmao to the degree of burnt you got... The num is certainly more than 6 , not to forget LUH is ordered because it's a HAL product . the story.... ? Well the one you made up with false e.g. <removed by mod> All have been exposed and dumped to ground with facts. You can still...

Again half baked shit... With nothing to do with topic... In b/w 50+ Ka 226 are ordered and in production apart from the 200 . Regarding Jags bs Mirage 2k...

ALH for the NUH ---- 0 that's a big fat Zero for now so stop misleading the facts. RFI doesn't get a proposal ? And for some dumb shit you were asking me to read history... Better you know that UK and French diplomat were both offering Jags and Mirage respectively.... in late 70s tonseal...

Dear Nephew /Niece All I know is those who have to procure don't give two heeds abt crybaby like you. If they believed so much in HAL product they would have inducted ALH . And navy leased Panther ? Again made up stuff.... A proposal by someone didn't mean it's done. Don't make up stuff...

You are back to delusional made up stuff from your part again.... And why just 384+ of one type bring Navy too which needs a lUH but in twin engine configuration. What you are proposing is saying we should not buy Rafale because we have cheaper single engine Tejas that can do the role. Well it...

True colors ? You wanted to buy 384 .. ka 226 T I just mentioned 111 Navy requirement too.. for which it is suitable. And this got you burnt upside down.. And who said there were two distinct requirements don't make things up ... 🙂

Why just 384 ? Ka 226 T unlike LUH it fits the role for Navy too and we will have lot more requirement in light heli category in future... decades to comes. Damn go for it if you want just one type it fits the bill. Else the new Airbus chopper H160 or Panther whatever you can afford.

Al 31 are TVC engine ? Rafale and typhoon e.g. doesn't work since LUH isn't more advanced nor better than Ka 226 T . Infact it is Ka 226 T which holds the advantage. In anycase just gibberish non sense it is... Why would we need to replace all 200*2 engine ?? And if it comes to that all...

You are officially unable to interpret anything... Even USA at any point of time have 4 types + fighter jet apart from many sqd of migs F-5 etc for training. Indian issue is having multiple outdated platforms.. while competent one in small no.s The key is production cost must justify and...

You can keep that out of space non sense outburst to yourself. If you don't understand elementary English not my problem either... What do you eat to write such nonsense.. 1. We are buying Rafale old Mirage old Mig 29s Su 30 to Tejas etc etc. Funny why not just Tejas and not Rafale...

Where did I proposed VIP transport as major role for Ka 226 T . Now you are making it up. Read the full statement mine and yours and what was said and why it was said. You brought the crash record trying to paint holy picture of Dhruva which there is none. Infact I can give several...

Phat boi.... Non aerodynamic ? 🙂 are you sure abt that ? It's not fat but it's length is shorter as it doesn't need tail rotor due to coaxial rotor which will provide better handling too in mountainous region. The back cabin is detachable and can be used for multiple purpose providing cargo...

Who told you 200 helos for VIP transport.... ? You need to fact check your source. How much load ALH Dhruva is able to carry at Siachen ? Do make a comparison with LUH and Ka 226 T and the acquisition and operational cost...

And as said repeatedly again... Twin engine is an advantage that cant be denied however one may try to twist it. Many cheetal/chetak have crashed but cost of operation and acquisition took priority over more safety. Everyone knows that senior officials are advised to travel in twin engine helis...

I think the two blade fold is much better option that this taliboom fold. Offcourse Ka 226 T have advantage in this case too which is why I hope HAL can incorporate it in future with TOT coming from Ka 226 T and manufacturing experience I think navy should divide the 111 no. Into 60 Ka226 T...

No need fixing.... The twin engine is an added and welcome boost. Choppers have high risk of fatalities and single engine choppers when faced with engine issue are prone to it. ( Yes this reasoning will exist till time eternal ) Add coaxial rotor and smaller size providing better handling ...