Search results

  1. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    this is the indian T-90 Bhisma if you look above the gun, you will see it is missing the Laser warning receivers. also camouflage is standard russian tricolor.
  2. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    yeah well 2500mm you're not measuring from the crew hatch, you're measuring from the back of the cupola ring to the front of the turret. measuring from the crew hatch opening, you have ~2150-2200mm.
  3. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    about 18-20cm. also, the vision block measured is the commanders 3 o' clock vision block, so you need subtract 39cm, since it's approximately at the center of the hatch. and there's a small wedge between the sight cutout and gunshield about 50mm long, according to the drawing.
  4. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    post #957 "cupola periscope assembly" i list them as 700mm. that's from front periscope to back periscope. if you take the lower metal "ring" into account, that's 800mm.
  5. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    yes, i didn't add all of the small details like i usually do, didn't make a texture, the TC hatch and loaders cupola only have the right size, but not the right shape, hatch hinges and such are missing etc. all i did was make the walls match the line drawings as closely as i could, and then...
  6. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    because i've done this 4-5 times already, and i'm sick and tired of it. i've said the diameter of the TC's cupola is 800mm, and i did not "change" it to suit my needs, you simply failed to catch the fact that a man sits in front of the TC called the gunner the first time i put up my estimate...
  7. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    they don't have to be perfect, only within a specific range. original Claim of kunal biswas and ershaktivel was 350cm turret width, our claim about 282-295cm. if we missed by 5cm or so, that's fine. we'd have to miss by 60cm in order for Ershaktivel and Kunal to be correct.
  8. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    hmmh, the numbers i get is around 179-182cm, determining the vanishing point in that picture is hell however, since there's no clear points of measure, not to mention there's warping in the image as well...
  9. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    i've demonstrated numerous times your blatant measuring errors, mathematical errors, and factual errors, i've made lists of the mistakes you've made. you're nothing but some teenage kid in your mothers run down basement, too poor to even afford a decent CAD drawing program, or image editing...
  10. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) anyone can put a ruler to their screen, but its horribly inaccurate. CAD drawing is renowned for it's incredible precision. i was doing what you were doing, but with far more precision.
  11. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    accurate enough for what. it's certainly more than accurate enough to show how thin the turret sides on the Arjun are. it's simply physically impossible for the turret sides to be thicker than the estimate i made. all Main battle tanks are made on compromises, and designed for a specific form of...
  12. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    did any of you use measuring tape when you were on the Arjun? No? Ask any armor crewmember in the world about the width of the turret on the tank they spent the last 3-10 years on, and NOBODY will be able to tell you the exact width. Ed williams, a former National guard US army tanker, who has...
  13. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    a prime example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
  14. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) says the guy who puts a ruler to his computer screen, and claims it's more accurate than the software used to design and build the arjun...
  15. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) how about you stay on topic?
  16. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) i guess i agree, Ershaktivel is a nobody :P if i'm not entirely mistaken, the Arjun was put into service in 2004, no? the arjun has been compared with base versions and upgraded versions of 1980s european tanks too, and here it compares poorly as well...
  17. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) no it's apples and apples. i'm saying indian apples have worms in them, you're saying India will be able to sell them anyways, because chinese and pakistani apples have worms in them as well. but then you get offended when i say turkish apples have less worms...
  18. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) so saying the truth about the Arjun is trolling? yeah it hurts that Indian tank manufacturing isn't as great as you wish it was, but that is the truth.
  19. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) so you agree that the turkish managed to make a better tank than the indians in less than 5 years. fair enough. how long is the indian FMBT projected to take? i mean, with everything the indians has learnt from the 20 year development run for the arjun, it...
  20. D

    Indian Army Armored Vehicles

    Re: Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) the problem is india attempted to redesign the wheel with the Arjun. Compare to Altay tank program of turkey. turkey's never made a tank before, and yet they developed one in 5 years. and i'd say it's superior to the arjun, it's got compartmentalized...
Top