Search results

AFAIK original problems with AR-15 comes from propelant charge. Originally AR-15 was designed for Dupont made prolenat charge, and gun worked good with it, however during tests, it become obvious that this propelant charge is vurnable to wet wheater conditions. It was then changed to standard...

Did I claimed so anywhere? No, however MSBS is definetely assault rifle that can compete with other modern designs, and there is nothing to be ashamed about it. Well, I would be carefull. High unreliability of AR-15 system is mostly a myth as far as I know from guys that are seriously involved...

Compare the rifles design, it is logical. I think you do not understand a concept (which does not surprises me). You can do it in the field with basic tools provided to the soldier with rifle, and if you have modules. And no, these are not two different guns. What you know better than our...

1) Better ergonomics and other solutions 2) Can Masada/ACR be reconfigured in to bullpup design in field? No, you have answer 3) For example this idiotic charging handle in ARX 160, why I would want a recicropating charging handle that is needed to switch from one side to another? It is complete...

No, MSBS is better than Masada/ACR, looks similiar to them, but is much better designed system. ARX 160 is not even comparable in capabilities with MSBS, Italian design have too many unnececary gizmos, making it more complicated and expensive. As for weight, assault rifle can't be too light or...

It is neither the most "ergonomic, ambidextrous, lightweight, accurate, adaptable, and reliable infantry combat weapons in the world". There are more modern and better designs currently nearly in the end of R&D cycle. For example our MSBS project. MSBS contrary to ARX 160 is truly modular...

ARX 160 is nothing special, neither is something special use of a drum mag, any modern AR can use such magazine.

Czech Republic, which obviously selected their own design for obvious reasons. ;) I know that people that have very big knowledge about fire arms are not very enthusiastic about CZ805.

OICW is a long time dead program... you didn't know? :shocked:

I think it is reasonable. MSBS is not worse than other competing designs, in some terms is even better, as it is trully modular design, not only in terms of changing calliber, but also it is designed from base to be both classic and bullpup design. BTW the only tool needed to converse it from...

MSBS-5,56.

Pity, that in poll, there is not MSBS mentioned. :rolleyes: Just saying. ;)