Search results

  1. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Now this is much better. Notice the line are much cleaner. So, obviously the fit and finish has improved greatly. Also, the nose "appears" shorter and more blunt!
  2. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Personally, I am concern that Russia will sell the S117 along with the Su-35 to China!:mad:
  3. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    You may very well be wasting your time. As few here want to discuss serious issues or solution. The sky is blue and everything is great!
  4. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Well, why didn't Russia let India in on the ground floor with the development of the PAK-FA??? Which, is what India must do with the AMCA. That is partner early on with a Aerospace Company (preferably Western) just a development starts! A perfect example in my opinion is Boeing with the F/A-XX...
  5. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

  6. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    No, the US never had a plan for a two seat F-35 and the F-22 is out of production.
  7. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    I still believe India should have purchased the rights to build and develop a 2-Seat Strike Version of the PAK-FA. Something like a 5th Generation F-15E/K. Which, would be a market untapped.....
  8. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    I agree...........odds of South Korea purchasing the PAK-FA are slim to none! Respectfully
  9. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Hardly useful in the real world of Air Combat. Which, has been stated over and over again. To stop still even for a second is more often than not fatal.:wave:
  10. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    The US hardly thinks "All Future Air Combat" will be at BVR. Yet, the majority will and that is supported by fact. Regardless, the F-22 and F-35 will be more than capable of handling any fighter in WVR Engagements.
  11. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    The F-22 has more drag that what???
  12. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    No, you need to support your opinion with facts.
  13. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    That is your opinion and hardly supported by fact......
  14. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    That depends on the engines. Which are still in development.
  15. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Let's see a source that states the F-22 is much more draggy (your words) than a F-15.....LOL
  16. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Do you really want me to open up the cost escalation of Indian Military Programs! That said, the cost increases for the F-35 are way below many US Defense Programs. The critics just like to try to spin in their favor... Examples of cost increases form the US Government (GAO) of various...
  17. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    I believe Lcokheed Martin has built over 4400 F-16's of all makes. Also, the price depends the model and options.
  18. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    Really, Lockheed Martin is building the "best" fighter in the world bar none! As for cost it has little to do with LM and more with numbers. When the F-22 was in development over 600 Raptors were planned. Then the US Government cut the order to the 300's and finally "183". That said I believe...
  19. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    The PAK-FA and J-20 are larger twin engined Fighters. That will be constructed in the hundreds. While, the F-35 is single engined and likely to be built in the thousands......... In short the odds are the F-35 will be cheaper to produce and maintain than either the PAK-FA or J-20.
  20. Crusader53

    Sukhoi PAK FA

    We have no information to suggest the PAK-FA has better range than the F-22. Let alone "Twice" the range..........
Top