Search results

  1. C

    Agni V Missile

    Single warhead. Highest official yield of 300+ kt. Official range of 5500 km.
  2. C

    Agni V Missile

    Becoz thanks to some commies among us, this project was blacklisted in 2012. Someone started crying that DRDO is investing on a TEL which services has not yet asked for. But it made a come back recently and is very much in picture right now. @IndianHawk as @captscooby81 mentioned, it's not for...
  3. C

    Agni V Missile

    Common............. These things are well known in any intelligence circuit. They are kept under surveillance 24x7 regarding what information they are sharing in open media or in friend circle. Uploading a video in youtube with face shown is least of the worry for any agency. Programmes like...
  4. C

    Agni V Missile

    :crazy:... If an intelligence agency doesn't know about the ongoing project or people involved in it, then its no good. There was no youtube video on BRAHMOS team or people working on it, but still people there got targeted by foreign intelligence. So just chill.
  5. C

    Agni V Missile

    I have another conspiracy theory for this and I would keep it to myself :biggrin2:
  6. C

    Agni V Missile

    MIRV is not a technical challenge for India. But as I always say, the yield of per warhead would be a factor here. But that's another topic for another thread.
  7. C

    Agni V Missile

    It holds by theory true that India would never go for a longer range SSM after A5 officially. Longer range version we would see after this would only be SLBM.
  8. C

    Agni V Missile

    Well @porky_kicker did mentioned it is from ISRO. He just asked to compare it with another slide presented by DRDO.
  9. C

    Agni V Missile

    S 400 has limited ABM capability. It is more of a SAM rather being BMD. With 40 km altitude range, its more comparable to AAD. But whereas AAD is being designed as an BMD system from ground up, S-400 is designed as a SAM. It might be capable to intercept a CM, but its interception against a RV...
  10. C

    Agni V Missile

    Someone has this very bad habit of not reading what is quoted. Did Kalam used the term Parameters or Components? Again its a very bad habit of comparing work culture of two nations. Component testing is not bound to be done in a firing test. But Parameter testing is done only in a firing test.
  11. C

    Agni V Missile

    Sorry......... Was not replying you.
  12. C

    Agni V Missile

    Few people here don't understand difference between components and parameters.
  13. C

    Agni V Missile

    Someone over here was jumping around with a straw in hand that why India doesn't tests its missiles numerous times like other nations. Now for those, let me present something from Dr Kalam... https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/Abdul-Kalam-and-the-media.html Now 600 parameters in 3 test...
  14. C

    Agni V Missile

    Please enter a message with at least 30 characters.
  15. C

    Agni V Missile

    First of all stop bringing politics in irrelevant threads. Want to discuss it, there is Chit Chat thread. Anyway, going by your logic, none of the sates should have existed in India too. And by your logic, Tibet and whole of NE India should have been a part of Mongolia.
  16. C

    Agni V Missile

    One simple question............... Did you watched the video I shared? Did you asked anyone who is in knowledge of the language regarding what it was about? The orator there is the person who is associated with IGMDP. Regading your question as what has been prooved by late induction of A1...
  17. C

    Agni V Missile

    You are? I am too really impressed by sheer stupidity of yours in seeing facts. Do your pea sized brain remember the fact when I mentioned the fact that we can't afford to have multiple tech demos and test missiles? We have to work with what we have in absence of economic luxury. So even being...
  18. C

    Agni V Missile

    You would not have written such a useless long response if you would have followed up the Missile development programme of India. For a layman like you, let me give a brief history of Agni series and specific reasons for coming up with different versions and what improvements been made in each...
  19. C

    Agni V Missile

    I simply gave the 2017 failure as example of user trial failure when member Kshithij's claim that India has no user trial failure. You jumped in and gave me a "Do you know" series with a assumption "Of course you don't know". You better re-read what I said. I only answer your question by...
  20. C

    Agni V Missile

    Mr Intelligent.............. Open your eyes and look back few pages. A2 was inducted in service during NDA rule in 2001. But after that too it had undergone development. Its design was not freezed after induction. Where I said that its development were only after 2010? Could you dare to pint it...
Top