Search results

Check your date in the wiki

PRC has 3000+ Type 96.

"Propably yes. " for what ? "35km" + "1600-1800m" + "100%"? Type 96A proved itself at the last tank game : "~40 km/h" + "1600-1800m" + "90%"

It is your homemade "fact".

where is the 35km/h from? Is that related to moving position 1600-1800m 100% accuracy? So, you can given 1000 times if you want . But, what is the 1600-1800m related to moving position targeting accuracy?

yeah, the "poor copy" had total 92.8% accuracy against 60% of the original one.

1.at what speed? 2.what is the distance? again, the pic is given at what speed? and what distance? also, dont forget to prove

So,is that says the target is hitted by a leo at "moving 35km'h from 1600-1800m"? also, dont forget to prove

You did not prove anything but showed us a manual. I want you to prove the pic : the target is hitted by a leo at "moving 35km'h from 1600-1800m". also, dont forget the proof of

again, prove the target in your pic is hitted by a leo at "moving 35km'h from 1600-1800m".

check your eyes.

any proof ?

prove the target in your pic is hitted by a leo at "moving 35km'h from 1600-1800m". Hope we can see those " not suck ones" next year at the game.

Then, what can make the small hole on the right front?

LOL, how can you proof that? well, those "not suck ones" are so scared to compete at a same place and time.

the feedback from battlefield http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/indian-army/53509-russian-tank-biathlon-4.html post #52

notice the speed of Type-96 when it is shooting and T-72's Type 96 got all the targets.

1. this is not fixed position 2.the base is 342X 237 not 137

1. 1600m -1800m (both moving and fixed) vs 1000m (fixed?) 2. Type 96 had total 92.8% (26/28）accuracy at this game ( fixed 100%, moving 90% ) at 1600m ,1700m and 1800m distance. (the missed two are moving positions at 1800m) Russia had total 60% accuracy at the game. 3. It would to fair to...