Search results

Because standardization has it down side look at the Indian Sukhoi-30 fleet... that can be considered pretty standard. And what we have right now are old and upgraded chats that had been standardized back ine 2001. It's better to do step by step, except India has not been doing that very well...

Thoda bhot ku6 to laga hi lenge.. Not same as the OPVs. Plus a support vessel can rely on the radar, sonar etc. of the main capital ships. Like for example, anti-sub version can carry towed sonars & decoys, RBU-6000, SMART in VLS etc. & become a massive force multiplier (as the capital ships...

Point tabi was trying to make is that, the supply & proof food are very minor considerations, compared to fuel-space etc. If the ship is capable of making 12000 it is capable of taking enough food for that long voyage. Thinking otherwise it's just extremely retarded logic twisting. Not...

No. For the last few days of the 12000km voyage, that it's capable of doing, the crew of Saryu class are supposed to eat each other. That's how it was designed.

Saryu class has 12000km range, Sachi were supposed to have 10000km... Any corvette built on them would be blue-water.

Nope.

Depends on money flow & design tweakings demanded during the process... Normally 5-7 years.

Budget has always been the issue, not building capability... And the answer is, nobody really knows. Not even GoI. These are targeted to be commissioned by 2030. IN don't consider them underarmed. I think universal VLS has some technical shortcomings too... They have made no demads for...

Of you go on copying the same thing without progression, then you'll end up with another Su-30 case. We needed to tap up our capabilities.

This madlad is to be nearly twice the size of Kolkata/Visakhapatnam class... Basically 6 cruisers. They'll look nothing similar (at best you can compare Nilgiri with Kolkata & extrapolate).

Bhak!.. That's Nilgiri frigate. No matter. Real nahi to fanart hi sahi...

****** *******! :notbad: (Edited by Mod) Any photu?