Search results

  1. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    It's more complex than that... F-18 had LERC, Rafale has canards& large wing area, Mig-29 had high T/W. These are all factored in, not just thrust
  2. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Ok I'll need source for that? Edit: Or do you mean, from catapult?
  3. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    With combat weight... But how much, I see two drop-tanks (volume?) Anyone knows?
  4. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    For a moment i thought it Tejas 🥲
  5. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    No. Maybe just a reuse.
  6. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Ye chutiya ban kyu ho gya 😅
  7. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    These issues will stay always imo
  8. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    We bought 45 Mig-29K...we don't have them all. Anyways, no matter how much jerkoff goes on at F-18.. It's not gonna happen  MRCBF is like MMRCA.2 🖕🙂🖕
  9. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Don't trust anything you see in Trishul..
  10. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Yup.. And that's all I need.
  11. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Listen kiddo, you're just showing that you know next to nothing about carrier ops. Mount capacity don't matter here, you don't get full runway length. whether your jet can takeoff with it from sky-jump is only thing that matters. I'll make it simplr fir ya... We have NO evidence that Su-33/J-25...
  12. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    We know... It's the only 4 that's being pointed put here. Literally the LCA Navy carries more. Mig-29K can do 8. So yeah, it's shit at that task too. Let's see how J-31 fares.
  13. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    This I don't know the technical details about.. No comments.
  14. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    NLCA doesn't..
  15. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Couldn't have explained it better in my life 👌 And the 2nd last sentence is reason why I said we should simply get few augmenting squadrons Mig-35 as stopgap till MWF-AMCA, instead of MMRCA+MRCBF. We already spent Indian taxpayer money on developing its basis Mig-29K & IAF will operate 62+21+41...
  16. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    It does.. Mig-29k short takeoffs at only 130-150kmph from carriers instead of 270kmph, Su-33 or J-15 at 120kmph. So you need the skyjump to set it in a projectile path. Vikrant speed can add another 55kmph to it w.r.t the surrounding air. It's also common practice to face the wind.
  17. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Not those... We have flying-boats bought from Japan as rescue planes. I meant something like those for the larger aircraft so that they won't depend on carrier deck for takeoff & landing.
  18. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Firstly you don't know shit, China never bought Mig-29. 2ndly it has 2000km ferry-range now kiddo.. Mig-29k is basically Mig-35. Nope eat you bat testicles & go to sleep.
  19. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Good thing these are not swallows then. We have our sayings... "Eagle can snatch a goat, crow can't" (crow is the Joke-15 here). Now cope 😎
  20. Bleh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Ok ok.. Our ship is faster... has more range... can carry 36-40 jets... who can take off with more payload & full internal fuel... giving them (ferry)range of 2000km without droptanks... Cope chink cope :cool3: :cool1: :hat:
Top