Search results

Srry don't get hung up on wording. I didn't notice I wrote that until you mentioned 😅 anyways the rocket-pods are smaller because (1) they're needed to strike at much higher altitudes, so 4 of them should still be light enough & (2) the targeting system of LCH is deemed exceptionally accurate by...

What! How?.. Please read & understand my words before replying. I can't find any photo of your Mangusta with more than 8 (LCH is restricted to that only at Ladakh altitude). In plains LCH can have 12 ATGMs, against Apache's 16, or this combo... Just its rocket pods are smaller & are in same...

LCH structure is supposed allow 12 ATGMs max. I don't the exact weight of those, but the rocket pods are apparently the same weight class as the dual-ATGM racks (as permitted on outer hardpoints). At service ceiling of 6500m or can carry about 500kg payload, I think, if I remember. But LCH...

Ya that I already know, that's why asking. This one here... Looks like empty hole. Future sensor placement spot?

No just at the base of the the tailfin, some in at beginning of the video... Looks like some sensor optics.

@porky_kicker any idea what's that on the tail?

They made mockups of both. First one was just a modified Dhruv... ...the later one look super cool. All stealthy & sleek.

Fuck.. we've posted hundreds of Twitter links. @hit&run @ezsasa @tarunraju @Indx TechStyle plz see what's wrong. I could see twitter embeds from even before I joined.

You don't have to... Aren't the pics visible to you?

Mainly built for high altitude ops.

More or less the same thing is happening... Pretty much like the IOC of Tejas.

Nah. they're gonna gather dust for some time one way or the other, until ATGM integration is complete.

...Or you could say they can carry out this bullshittery with only indigenous platforms built by PSU/PPPs. Plus it's not like they're ordering more Apaches.

This is how meaningless a "formal order placement" is for desi platforms...

:creepy: