Search results

You wanted to know why your aircraft hasn't been painted. Now you know and knowing is half the battle...

It is quite obvious why they would cancel with such a poor turning radius. The problems suffered by copying the F-35 when even the Americans can't make it a good dogfighter make the J-31 useless.

1:25 - 1:53 = 28 seconds

Considering it takes 28 seconds to complete a 360º turn they probably determined it wasn't worth moving forward. Smart move actually...

3 tons heavier than the poor performance we saw at the airshow. This thing is DOA.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? :lol: btw, oil production has fallen 10% from two years ago. China has become so dependent on copying others you don't have the skills to create for yourself. You have failed to duplicate SCB production technology as well as many...

All these engines yet China signs agreements with foreign engine manufacturers. :lol:

Really? Then why is there a vortex formed on one flap on landing? According to your logic this A400M should be making loops with a 1:1 T/W ratio. :laugh:

Great picture... I can really see the AESA clearly there.

You mean the one with the interrogators sticking out of it? :lol: If you call that AESA I call you taco.

Yes necessarily, lower surface area = smaller return. China needs to get an AESA first to worry about it.

The smaller the surface area the better. It reduces RCS. It uses a small Zhuk radar set so it is plenty of room.

It doesn't imply anything except pressure building on the wing. How much no one knows.

If you ever bothered to follow my critiques of DRDO, you would know how foolish that sounds. Anyway, you 50 centers aren't really in a position to talk when you buy engines from us and everybody else that will sell them to you.

Because WS-10 is a leaky, fragile and snail paced paced piece of crap. That it is a failure. Because they have yet to get 30 year old engine tech. I know precisely what China is up to, it involves a xerox machine. 50 cent Army should shut up. All is already revealed.

Those pictures display well its new AESA. :lol:

It is safe to assume that Shenyang doesn't have the metallurgical skills that Lockheed or Dassault has. Weight will be several points higher for the same mass. Go that this fighter is for export only, it will be another thunder blunder. Even worse coming out of Shenyang.

You are the one claiming a failed Russian design based on the 80s MiG 1.44 is superior to a 4++ gen western airframe with 5th gen avionics. You remember that thread yet you forgot it? Quite wasting my time requesting things I have posted several times already. A pilot pulling as tight a turn...

Already posted troll. http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/china/30765-video-j-20-testing-turn-radius.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er61emE6fiE Everyone with the tiniest knowledge is comparing it to the flying brick F-111, including Bill Sweetman. btw he writes for Ares blog...

Actually that turned out very true. Video showed it takes over 40 seconds to get to military thrust and it turns like a brick. J-31 has to carry external fuel tanks to even get in the same range so it has the same problem. With two inefficient engines to feed it has even worse range problems...