Search results

  1. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Ok ignoring is not correct term. But Nihilistic Budhism is like that. They give zero priority to worldly matters.
  2. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Lets say we have two spheres. In one spear, you are living. How will you learn about other sphere? Either you learn everything about the sphere your are in or just ignore everything about it. Ignoring everything is Buddhist way. Sunyatha means zero consideration to everything that is in nature.
  3. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    His ancestors were never wrong. At the time of his enlightenment, our country going through a phase. The two main two sections of our society which are Brahmins and Khsatriya were at odds. Brahmins made the whole god thing very complicated. So he got tired of all these rituals and non-sense...
  4. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    That is what our elders saying from start. Buddha is reformer. But these guys want to detach Buddhism from our legacy and claim it as theirs. Like Buddha born in India accidentally and that is to it. No more credit to us. I had this kind of debate in few other religious forums. Theme is same here.
  5. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    That is the problem with these guys. Here I am discussing about Brahman and he quickly started dressing it down saying that because of lack its credibility, Buddha started some thing new out of nothing. Like vedic rituals are some bogus thing. In our country, we have infinity ways to reach...
  6. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    So ancestors of Buddha are wrong and he is right. Thats how we still have vedic rituals and everything. You are mistaking Brahman with Braqhmin caste. COme on dude, Read few of our scriptures, you may learn few things. Claiming Buddh created whole new out of nothing is pure non-sense. He sold...
  7. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    True Buddhists don't do arguments. They love like hurricane.
  8. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Buddha rejected brahman claims because it was necessary at the time. Buddhism was kind of weapon he used on our ancient brahmins(a section of our people). At the time, brahmins were kind of dicks to our society. They kind of trapped the people in their traps. Buddha at the time, kind of...
  9. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Doing you duty is great. But it won't help you in long term, if you don't devote yourself to the deity. At the time of kurukshetra, it is required Arjuna to uphold his duties because it is needed. And also note the quote Here it is said that do the task but never think about result. It means...
  10. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Gita says only one thing which is detachment from every thing. It is like some kind of shedding where you shed all the hoarded up non-sense inside your mind. Meditation is not good. It only takes you to some point where you might be more observant than before. That's it. Devotion is shortest...
  11. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    There is no merging in Moksha. Two lines depicting the correct word is, Either you fill you mind with Brahman which is called samyama. Or shed yourself until you realise.
  12. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    I apologise If my posts coming out like rude. The main problem with this spiritual stuff is , You have scriptures and you have you. But you don't know the route from you to Brahman. This is root for all frustration. The methods we have now are not suitable for practice. People from hundreds...
  13. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    You have to let go of everything and then fill that with Brahman. Adwaita is shortest way to moksha.
  14. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    It is some sort of satvika bliss. Never mistake normal with abnormal. Brahman is pure knowledge and once you come back from it, you won't pose questions.
  15. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    Have you ever enquired what this infinite is instead of reading these scriptures? You are telling kshatriya to stop asking for models but you seem to have attached to some kind of models even though you are not aware of it. The explanation you had given looks like some kind of math model which...
  16. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    You are talking like you have some kind of enlightenment yourself. What is it like?
  17. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    I think I come under sankyans. They seem to pretty much satisfy my curiosity unlike Bhakthi people. Are you by chance any devotee?
  18. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    There is this sect who are obsessed with models and inference knowledge. Sankyans are what they are. It's ok to ask for any inference to Brahman. Everyone has to start some where.
  19. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    It's because your are attached to some thing else which in turn bonds you to prakriti thus clouding your realself. Try to detach yourself, you will understand.
  20. A

    The Atheism/Agnosticism Thread

    You can't ask question 'Why' because light can't highlight same light. Brahman is pure knowledge itself. And sole reason for the understanding of the world. You can't query Brahman with Brahman. As you are Brahman itself and beyond these thinking and logic, It is impossible to question...
Top