Search results

^ The methodology is similar to CI/CD Agile - which is the rage in Tech world - esp when doing R&D

or could be upgraded to A 5 with an addition of stage? A3 with MARV would be good for Pakis or can be developed in ASBM? Meanwhile from the pictures of latest test of A 5- I guess the reason for camouflage- could be an existing non canisterised missile from stock was canisterised?

No, there does not seem to be any sort of exception to NFU for NWS or NNWS. NFU was designed to complement (I think) China's NFU- also as an additional benefit it helped in painting -overeager Pakistan - now & then flashing first use of Nukes - as a overexcited baboon with a knife set rampant...

Its ok, nobody is accurate 100 %. But to give credit where its due, he enlightened many on IMGDP, Nuclear Program. Infact, if i remember correctly he also wrote a software to predict trajectory. Another poster whose postings I enjoyed was Nitin_V, Nitin or Teer!? now on IAF. Very informative

Where?? any link? .

He did write few more articles, a contribution to a book on Missiles/Warheads (Lightning Bolts: First Maneuvering Reentry Vehicles) and later spent time on a forum known as India-Forums(not the bollycrap one - there is another and I dunno if the said site is alive now)

Famous Arun S Vishwakarma's picture, man that person predicted future course of IGMDP fairly accurately more than a decade ago! I dont know why, but he has altogether stopped writing it seems.

@sayareakd By the way do you know where Arun Vishvakarma posts these days? After abrupt exodus from other forum - to his brief stay in indiaforums(now defunkt!?) - to his last presence found via few presentations found in slideshare, he sort of vanished> He had very good knowledge around Indian...

Yes you found out the problem but at wrong place. The problem is that wrong set of data or erroneous data that you are referring to. Even hardcore skeptics have referred to yield of Thermonuke alone to be of min 25 /22 KT. Given commie bots generally gulp down hot red $hit coming down from red...

Any official publication indicating that? I remember somewhere reading one of device exploded or to be exploded was pulled from earlier stock to check its validity. Also I dont know how correct is Wiki entry, BUt Shakti 3 is being alluded to another Thermo device without its primary

yes could be .

No, pic is of 98 , I was alluding to device, it could be one from older late 80's stock(which would have slight improvement over Shakti 1 device) or other device. We do not know

Indian Govt did not tell whether the picture was of thermo nuke or of the one pulled from earlier stock. Its only public speculation..

Even then India has quite considerable experience on Reentry tech, which it demonstrated amply in both defense and non defense sectors. However its granted , in case of MIRV, multiple testing would be required for fine tuning accuracy and decoy strategies.