Search results

If you have noticed, I am the one giving petroleum theory of war and have extensively written about how petroleum can't be substituted. Only closest substitute is coal liquefaction

There will be either a favourable deal with GCC or we are getting Iran oil

All of the countries whom India signed deal were either giving Uranium even before USA-123 agreement like Russia and former USSR states like Kazhakhstan or those who are NATO and allies -Canada, France, Australia etc

There is no surety even now. The uranium supply is sporadic and highly political. If USA changes direction, the Uranium supply can vanish. The deal only gives waiver and nothing else

India just has 6-7GW of nuclear energy. 2.4GW is for military plutonium production. India really does not care if 1-2 GW of civilian nuclear reactor went down. We have hundreds of GW of coal power and other power with total installed capacity over 300GW. 1% change is not a big deal

These are useless experts. India always used to get uranium from Russia even before USA came in

From when did Gandhi become a well wisher of Hindus? Tell me what good did Gandhi do to Hindus? Khilafat movement was due to cowardice of anti-hindu nature of Gandhi. This was not in Hindu-Muslim unity but emboldened muslims

This is the most retarded thing I have seen There is no point talking to you.

What are you trying to say here? I said that Taliban is in Afghanistan and it has nothing to do with kashmir. Regardless of Kashmir issue, Taliban will not allow the pipeline. I am well aware of TAPI pipeline but I am also aware of the nuisance of security. Now, speaking of Kashmir issue, the...

What resource is there in PoK? It is a wasteland with only crazy people who will come to India if India occupies it. India must get land only without the crazy people inhabiting there. Also, why do you think that getting PoK will make Afghaistan give pipelines to India? The Taliban in...

Which point is bullshit and why must also be presented. The only problem with many here is that they are low IQ people who only understand what they are told and can't think properly even when nudged to.

You are a nonsense. That is the problem. If you made sense, you would be answering my questions or rebutting, not running away. When you can't understand, just brand that as bullshit

We want every reactor to be military ones to maximise plutonium production. I have been emphasising this everytime. There is no difference between a PHWR reactor in military use and civilian use as both end up producing plutonium. What difference does it make if kakrapur reactor produced...

The continuity of UPA agreement was not as direct as the presstitute news says. Modi has demanded that India must be expeditiously given good amount of Uranium from wester countries like Australia, Canada, France etc in return for continuing. Instead of abrogating the agreement, Modi has...

The problem here is that the 14 reactors are also important to india. Of the 14 reactors, about 10 are capable of producing plutonium for nuclear bombs as they are PHWR reactors and specialised for plutonium production. 150 ton of Natural Uranium can produce 1GW of power for 1 year in PHWR...

You are a USA stooge, a traitor at best. The real intention behind NSG waiver was to ensure Indian nuclear plants are under IAEA to prevent nuclear weapons. India has abundant coal reserves as well as large Uranium reserves, amounting to 2% of the world. India did not need international Uranium...