Search results

Unfortunately UK & EU already developed and deployed those & India still catching up.

Excluding engine[most important part] what high tech India developed so far ?

iff Pak buys 5th gen and its depend on engine. IAF consider sixth gen first[EU]. Another 36 or 54 rafale, then consider 6th gen. Russians jets gets replaced by Indian jets excluding a small portion of mki. Hi-Lo tech, Hi from uk,eu & lo from India. <Just a guess>

When US offered F 35 to India ?

"got/getting tested" - Past vs present vs future. There is lot of reasons for navy to consider SH, from iac2 & 1, emals, aag, aew, p8, romeo, low cost munitions , tedbf, chinese navy etc and IN choose fa18f for training, if IN select sh. US don't support tejas as f/a18ef trainer, may be...

I'm only considering current conditions not future Till date only Derby, rest is near future. and inferior to mig 21 [ioc] like iaf said & foc inferior to m2k, what you are saying is future, and its depends on future gov, ada, hal etc. In future lca comes with better weapons than you said...

super sukhoi is a term used by sukhoi to upgrade mki with fgfa tech it is a cancelled program, like fgfa. Now russian offering upgrade based on su35 & su30sm. IAF not interested in any of those. Now drdo developing tech to upgrade/modify mki. HAL upgrading some with astra/drdo bombs etc and...

Waiting.................................................................but first, let allow to HAL to deliver first batch to IAF. HAL is doing great job under NDA, and delays are normal in gov sector. Israel is very good with upgrading jets. [migs, jaguar, mirage etc] Anyone's knows when GE...

Mica ir/rf better than derby, spike for ground attack, internal guns ok, internal EW, MAWS not considering weight/range etc and lca still tested by hal. I'm only considering current conditions not future[mk1a ..]

MKI is a issue for IAF due to heavy class & two pilots. Tejas - ioc not so good, foc ok, still not good. rafale - too small in nos. Mirage 2000 is better than lca mk1 foc. Jaguar can do its job better with aesa/ew pod/asraam etc. mig 29 also there with astra, and .. Considering mki, iaf need mwf...

Yep, totally taking full advantage of our inability of R&D similar ones and from scorpene deal to rafale.

Wrong comparison. Rafale - 230 mil $ with out tot F 15 ID - 380 mil $ with out tot Mirage upgrade comes with overhaul tech, etc. And all these aircrafts comes with weapons and service support, custom modifications etc and plus spares for new ones and mk1a costs 60++ million $ [su 30mki] not...

Yes, IAF need to give some hope/chance to ADA and ADA needed to take best of it. IAF conducted all trial needed to understand its capability before choosing AH 64, CH 47 and C 17 and P8 used by IN, and GoI choose P8, M777 and C130, without any test or trial.

"Integrated propulsion system" integrated into range extension kit, its like rocket motor in meteor, I think.

Thanks.

SAAW having glide wings and I don't seen glide wings in Hammer, and all long range bombs having glide wings, putting question mark on aasm max range, and wiki and majority of articles says its range extension kit having motor booster. Anyone having more info about aasm range extension kit.

yes, from articles range extension kit uses rocket motor. Hammer is not a glide bomb, means it need a boot to reach 70km, or it range similar to jdam.

Hammer is like a rocket - having a propulsion SAAW is a glide bomb -not having a propulsion Spice having all versions..

No, russian missiles in majority,and mica, python 4, meteor plus asraam in small numbers, and upcoming astra for fighter jets. Mirage, lca, jaguar and rafale fire non russian missiles. I derby er little better than astra and similar to c7, astra similar to c5 with russian seeker tech and none...

jdam er like hammer with wings or just wings ?