Search results

lca already do have a good image .near 2000 flight tests none failed.its export possibilities only depends on its manufacturing costs. if if near or less than jf-17 it will be preferred by other customers over jf-17

i always have a doubt. if lca gets good orders from iaf and outside how many aircraft should be on order to keep the cost at30mil$ a piece?? or even less

Re: HAL Tejas, many people said many things, but it is what it is missed it :laugh:

Re: HAL Tejas, many people said many things, but it is what it is the fourth pic here lca flying high over snow covered mountain.its my favorite can any one pls tell when and where it was taken that too 2 lca's what is the need to test two at a time?

so according to your point in 3. a jf-17 too has fair chances of taking down an pakfa/f-22. the ucav's still are under development phase only and even the present designs are not for aewac or air missions point 5. & 6. seems 100% logical and am sure problems will be overcome in mark-2...

thanks:) congracts to our team of scientists so weight of the fighters doesnot play a major role in modern warfare when compared to other feautures? what aditional feautures does lca mark 2 gonna carry?

can i know then whats the problem for our people/politicians to defend the hard work of our scientists. can i know wether lca have capabilities to strike in china/pakistan (when needed) as its a different terrain and do it have all terrain/climate feautures

i heard that lca is made of different composite of materials which reduces its weight soo much... in what way the weight of a fighter important in war field ?

hiii to all i am new to this forum is lca a 4th generation aircraft or 4.5 generation aircraft:) why other country people always go on a blame game when its better than many aircfts like mig-21? when a mig 21 can bring down a pakistani naval plane why other people still call it a crap? in...