Search results

You are spot on. Fly by wire is no simple feet to achieve. If I recollect previously we were developing with the help of LM, but due to sanctions in '98 nuclear tests we have to develop in house. So it goes for many other indigenous systems. But you are trying to convince hit job is just...

IAF is like spoiled child. who wants everything but don't wanna pay for added capabilities.

But FOC will be delayed further if it were to be integrated in MK1/A, we can't afford to lose precious pilots and depleting fighter squadrons. Today itself one flying coffin crashed and still pilot is missing.

I hope it's for MK2 and not MK1/S. Otherwise endless saga of testing and certification will begin and one more reason for IAF to delay FOC. That's what they have done so far. MOD or PMO have to take direct control of LCA program, otherwise fate of LCA wont be different from that of Marut.

This paid hit job started as soon as MMRCA 2 was announced. Once again foreign lobbie's sleeper cells are activated.

That's quiet a revelation. don't quote me.

Tejas were intended to replace MIG-21, and Tejas exceeded in all parameters decade back. In case of SU-30, Why did IAF accepted incomplete aircraft in the first place? If i take your argument of stop gap then why din't IAF retired all MIG-21 and could have deployed MK1 as a stop gap. Not to...

I can assure, even if HAL/DRDO integrate LASER gun and Rail gun on Tejas and Arjun. Still these indigenous platforms will not be good enough for our armed forces and will demand more. IAF forget how SU-30 was inducted. SU-30 din't had all weapons fully integrated, and hence SU-30MKI was born...