Search results

The reason why no one has nuclear power plants in the Himalayas is high seismic activity. A nuclear plant requires water nearby but an earthquake could release nuclear material into the water and the Chinese will have no work to do after that.

No doubt. But why do you want a miniature nuclear plant exactly where the tunnels are? How will it help to have the cost and complexity simply for a tunnel which can get power from a dozen different sources. via cables You don't need a nuclear plant in every tunnel. And if you are going to...

With respect. may I point out that hydro electric dams require a river and a dam. If there is a river and a dam you can have hydroelectric power anyway and you don't need a nuclear reactor. If you have no river and no dam, you can have a nuclear reactor but you cannot make it look like a river...

Both reactors look similar because both were designed to be housed in a cylindrical submarine shaped and submarine sized tube. That is the only thing common in both pictures. There is no indication of size and size is everything - so a superficial similarity as in "Both reactors look like tubes"...