Search results

In short... Nobody knows. There was a report claiming better radar coverage, more composites etc. But seems highly unlikely. There will not be major structural changes. I guess the difference must be in mission computers, and some other avionics. But what we get from this programme is a hands on...

Agree with your first part. Cancelling of the FGFA however will not mean we wont have a fifth gen plane. It will only mean the importance of AMCA will go up as a strategic project and we will commit more funds and resources to it.

But what I dont understand is what do we have to gain from it? They definitely wont part with their best tech and we should not expect them to. It might be the best anywhere in the world but what is our contribution? What do we learn that we dont already know. Lets buy 100-200 of these...

what are GaN modules and what are the capabilities they add?

what further RCS reduction methods can be expected especially on the rear section? Has any headway been made in the much fabled plasma stealth tech? What will be done in phase 2 of the program?. Just love the way the Russians are going about this program

No you have mentioned it somehere here but when I asked you you didn't reply.

GHOST ? Thats what you call it right?