Search results

  1. Immanuel

    U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

    Look folks India did kick ass in all wars after intial losses, PAF did well in 65. It is very silly to underestimate those unwashes Abduls, they being the instigators of violence have in the past used the element of surprise and the momentum that comes from being the aggressor to their advantage...
  2. Immanuel

    U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

    The only reason why PAF did better in 65 was because the then PAF Chief Nur Khan was originally from Royal IAF and he was trained/indoctrined in the ethos, tactics & strategies of the IAF. He was commander of No.4 SQD in RIAF before joining PAF. Such training even back then was formidable and he...
  3. Immanuel

    U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

    when did US really fight a real decent army? By that standard it seems even the Taliban is a decent army since it's US's longest running war. It is very naive to quantify the strength of an army to things like weapons. Fighting even with rather basic gear & brutal tactics one can bring the...
  4. Immanuel

    U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

    The F-16s, F-15s, F-18SH are good fighters, any fighter pilot who knows anything in real about fighter aircraft knows this. It would be silly for anyone to take the teens lightly be it in BVR or WVR especially since the newest versions come with AESA, decent electronics and a wide set of...
Top