Search results

  1. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    you have seen my reply in kestrel thread, everything is inter connected.
  2. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    we didn’t know we had a golden goose in our backyard called information technology until Y2K frenzy happened in U.S. it happens when you are a young country, there will be areas we haven’t yet realised our potential.
  3. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    we haven’t seen compressed air missile ejectors yet, isn’t it?
  4. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    long way to go, they haven't even handed it over to IA for testing yet.
  5. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Not this one, this does not seem to have a soft launch capability. Don’t think IA asked for that particular capability.
  6. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    From DRDO scientific paper..... http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.908.5111&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  7. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    In all probability NAG's future is UAV, LCH and Rudra... Maybe even from LCA if DRDO can make have an extended range version of NAG.. for Anti-personnel role similar to hellfire...
  8. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Anyone has insights into gas propulsion in MPATGM which pushes the missile out of the tube before the main propulsion ignites?
  9. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    But at 10 billion $ capex, there is a limit to what can be bought. Your points are valid once defence budget crosses 5 lakh crores.
  10. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    I would like to see helina launched from LCH with target lazed by a drone. We may never see another tank battle with Pakistan.
  11. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    One more year of user trials then? Would there be high altitude (hot& cold) trials for this?
  12. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Saar!!! What's with your over expectations? There are threads here at DFI about nag from 2011-13 talking about trails of NAG. Poor chaps at DRDO finally managed to finish user trails after so many years, and here you are going into next two three versions in a span of week. Chill Saar...
  13. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Typical answer for some of the questions would be, that is what IA mentioned in GSQR hence the choice of procurement. for your last question. for bunker Busting and COIN ops, IA uses carl gustav and flamethrower. tank busting is left purely to Milan, Kornet and Konkurs(as per wiki).
  14. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Do you have any videos on how an IR seeker sees the target?
  15. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Let me try to put my comments in context: My initial post on the topic is a sarcastic reflection of state of things where a india's premier defence research organisation is wishing their primary user(IA) to accept a product which is yet to achieve the specifications that have been laid out. I...
  16. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Not appropriate to bring personal jibes into a technical discussion. Btw the answer to the question is, Christopher maybe good at what he does, I am also good at what I do . Let's leave out personal jibes, and focus on technical aspects of the discussion.
  17. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Ok, does this mean that there is no IR seeker in the entire world which can identify tanks in deserts when sun is up?
  18. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Can these problems be solved by integrated design bureau planned by IA?
  19. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Missing the point!!! I design systems which need user acceptance for me to get paid. I never ever in my career given a system for user testing which is not upto the mark. When I see a premier defence organisation like DRDO publicising their short fall in a news article and still expects their...
  20. ezsasa

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    What you say is perfectly alright!!! My issue is that DRDO is asking the user to accept something which is not up to the spec.
Top