Search results

  1. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    You referred to Arabs in general and I corrected you that it is only the Emaratis who have issues with Gwadar. They are not anti Pakistan. And where are you getting this crap from? Since when does Modi's foreign visits to our allies affect us? Unlike India we are not caught up in a Cold War...
  2. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Saudis do not support an independant Balochistan nor are they opposed to Gwadar, it's just the Emaratis. And what's being done in Karachi should have been initiated years ago, we might have saved many lives. And don't worry about me, I'm a patriotic pathan and my family serves in the army and...
  3. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Arabs? It's just the Emaratis who're opposed to the development of Gwadar. Other direct neighbor would be Oman and they are Pak friendly. Oman has even granted $20 million for the development of Gwadar International Airport.
  4. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Who are these people? Who wants seperation, which tribes? Please come with credible and neutral links.
  5. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Bhugtis are small community and do not represent all of Balochistan. Balochis are quite loyal to central government and they are patriotic people. Seperating Balochistan is a wet dream that will never come true. Khan of Qilat signed the treaty, he acceeded his territory to the Union of Pakistan.
  6. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Balochistan is not a disputed territory and well recongnised by UN as integral part of Pakistan.
  7. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Balochis have issues with the central govt and it's not a secret that persons are missing...just like in IoK. It doesn't make them sepertists, usually women and children suffer from the mistakes of their men. These are often misled. Baloch Human Right Organisation is indeed foreign funded. If...
  8. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Balochwarna.com? Another foreign funded site...says enough.
  9. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    China's ecinomic slowdown is indeed not completely unexpected but it's usually exaggerated. Don't forget that she holds almost three trillion in forex and can easily inject hundreds of billions into her economy like Japan's been doing. Yesterday's news papers reported that China has converted...
  10. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Iran's sanctions are to be lifted soon yet Washington remains opposed to IP Pipeline. How ridiculous is that? Doesn't it show the 'evil plan' of USA to prevent regional development?
  11. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    No, it has certainly not. The alliance was a cancerous one from the very beginning; USA supported the four military coups in Pakistan, killed Z.A. Bhutto (after killing King Faisal al Said in 1975), destroyed our economy by numerous embargoes and forced us to fight their WoT at gunpoint. But...
  12. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Wrong! There's no sharing in nuclear technology, we already have what we need. If having foreign bases is equal to selling out then Japan, UK and Germany were long sold before we became allies with China
  13. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    You got that right, I am pleased the way we are frustrating them and there's nothing they can do to change the Sino-Pak attempts to develop Balochistan. What is the worst that can happen? Declare us a rogue state? Who will suffer more from it, Pakistan or USA? The only reason we're still allied...
  14. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    What a bunch of hypocrites. Patriot Act rings a bell?
  15. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Any activist who is opposed to the development of his/her region should be marked as a traitor and a western puppet. Gwardar and CPEC will have an revolutionary positive effect on Balochistan this particular autonomous province is to gain the most.
  16. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Obviously the Think Tank is US-centeic but isn't is the height of naked arrogance to define our progress as 'evil' and demonise us?
  17. Neo

    Washington's policy towards Balochistan may change, says U.S. based think tank

    Care to explain what these so-called evil designs are?
Top