ROC was admitted under the legal fiction that it was the legitimate government of mainland China.
Remember when India said it was building missiles and atomic warheads to nuke Beijing and Shanghai?
Remember when India said it will intervene in the South China Sea?
China remembers those...
India has a special handicap. It is a small country.
The Soviet Union and the United States recognized China as the world's second-largest country in land area.
India is one-third the size of China. At best, India can only ask for a 1/3 vote at the UNSC.
You need to find two more India-sized...
No. That is not the way history unfolded.
China kept quiet and tried to have good relations with both the Soviet Union and the United States.
----------
You Indians can keep mouthing off against China, but I think you're foolish.
Japan and the Philippines mouth off against China, because...
The fault lines with the Indian government.
They are constantly mouthing off at China.
Being stridently anti-Chinese carries a price. It means the UNSC permanent seat will forever be beyond India's reach.
1. India is pro-US.
2. India is anti-China.
3. China will veto every Indian...
You haven't been paying attention to what I have been saying.
It doesn't matter if India develops a thermonuclear weapon. No one cares.
The UN Security Council is designed such that you cannot obtain a permanent seat when the application is vetoed. No matter what India does, the Chinese...
There is a problem in being 50 years late.
The countries of the world are not comparing you to 1970 China.
They are comparing you to 2016 China. If you don't measure up in supercomputers, hypersonic glide vehicles (HGV), anti-satellite kill vehicles, etc. then the countries of the world do not...
No, India is not.
1967. China detonated a 3.3-megaton thermonuclear bomb.
1971. China's DF-5 ICBM (range of 12,000 to 15,000km depending on payload size) had its first successful flight.
1972. China sat on the UNSC as a permanent member.
Today's India cannot match these three Chinese...
I'm right for two reasons.
1. India has made multiple attempts to join the UNSC as a permanent member over the last 20 years. The attempts were not close. There was very little support at the UN.
2. Mainland China has sat on the UNSC since 1972. That's 44 years. China isn't going anywhere...
The Chinese government came out strongly against India's NSG application.
With the new information, I had to revise down India's chances of joining the UNSC.
I'm a realist. Whatever new information that occurs in the real world, I start adjusting my model.
The Indian forum is over there. Go rant in there. Why are you haunting the Chinese sub-forum?
I'm only one guy. No other Chinese person sees or cares about your posts.
I only care, because you're clogging up my threads with junk posts.
Have you noticed that not a single Indian member has given you a "like" for your anti-China posts?
Why do you think that is?
Can it be they think you're wasting everyone's time?
Why not create your own "I hate China" thread and put all of your rants in there?
Why are you polluting my threads...
You know, I heard you the first 20 times you made that comment. You don't need to keep bashing everyone's head over and over again with the same comment.
I'm only speaking the truth. It is nothing personal.
As a military enthusiast, I gather the publicly available information and attempt to draw accurate conclusions.
I'm pretty confident in my assessments, because I think it reflects the real world situation.
I think most of my big-issue...
It's going to be a long wait.
I predict India will not be admitted to the UNSC as a permanent member in your lifetime.
You Indians (e.g. government, media, forum members, etc.) have been bashing China for a very long time. China returns the favor by vetoing your effort to join the UNSC. This...
You have ignored what I've been saying.
I'm saying history doesn't matter.
China is in the UNSC clubhouse and you're not. The permanent veto allows China to reject India's UNSC application. Until you can figure out a way to get past the Chinese veto, you're wasting your time with a UNSC...
No one is asking you to visit the Chinese sub-forum and read about the huge Chinese multi-billion dollar companies. If it bothers you, just stay in the Indian forums and be happy.
There is an important difference. Chinese companies are huge (e.g. Huawei, Baidu, Alibaba, etc.).
On the other hand, Indian companies are tiny. You only have Tata, five oil companies, and one bank.
Reference: Fortune Global 500
Give me a break. This is not 1972.
You cannot use China's 1972 standards to apply for a UNSC permanent seat.
Did mainland China have a permanent veto prior to 1972? No, it was held by Taiwan.
Did China have a permanent veto after 1972? YES. This means China will keep using its veto to keep...