Why is India lagging behind China ?

[Mr.Ryu]

1. Specialities of China

1.a. The national will of Indian politicians is weak compared to China.

1.b. China could achieve so much not because it followed communalism but due to capitalism.

1.c. China has learnt lesson of low tax recovery from the US.

1.d. The democratic tatters like 'strike', 'bandh', 'demonstrations/ rallies' etc. are not found in China.

1.e. CNN, BBC channels avoid criticism of Chinese politics.

1.f. There is no freedom in political field in China because they feel that it would lead to disintegration.

1.g. There is one-party Government in China, a communist country.

1.h. There are 15 countries on the boundaries of China. China is very strict with Taiwan because it has support of USA.

1.i. 70 % of Indian soldiers ( 7 lakhs) are stuck in Kashmir for indefinite period. In China, military strength is not wasted in such manner.

1.j. Owing to condition of duress, there is peace in the country.

1.k. China, Leading in marketing : China has taken over many markets in the world. Today, this country manufactures 80 % of shirts, 70% shoes, 70% toys of the requirement of the world. The key to such success is China keeps its prices very low and its standard as high as possible.

1.l. Capacity of workers is more : In China, workers work for 12 hours every day. They have no other holiday except Sunday.

1.m. China stands first in construction of canals, dams, roads etc.

2. Discipline in China

2.a. Equality in paying of electricity bills : Electricity is cheaper in China as compared to India. The only difference is that in India no minister or employee at lower level pays bills; but it is not so in China. Everyone has to pay electricity bill.

2.b. Law-breakers have to pay fine: Due to the duress, Chinese people are more disciplined than us. They are not in the habit of spitting anywhere beacuse such law-breakers are fined in China.

2.c. No bribing in China !

2.c.1. Vehicles are checked regularly; but there is no system of pushing a hundred rupee note in policeman's hand

2.c.2. Corrupt policemen are punished immediately in China. There is no government patronage for bribes and corruption.

2.c.3. Corrupt accused also have to pay fine : In the survey undertaken in the year 2006, Rs. 532000 billions were collected from corrupt accused before sending them to jail.

2.c.4. Dy. mayor demanding bribe at a construction site, was dismissed and imprisoned : In the year 2006, deputy Mayor of Beijing was arrested because he had demanded bribe during the big construction undertaken for Olympic games. The contractor lodged a complaint against him; inquiry was conducted and he was exposed. He was immediately dismissed and arrested; his property was confiscated; he was shown no mercy despite being a high level officer.

2.c.5. Death sentence to criminal : A criminal can be given death sentence for crimes like carrying drugs weighing more than 3 gms, for crimes like rape and murder; whereas in the year 2006-07, more than 100 administrative officers were suspended in Maharashtra for corruption; cases filed against them are going on for many years; but they are getting their remuneration.

3. Business between China and USA
China sends goods worth US $ 3,25, 0000 billion dollars to USA every year; but USA sells goods worth only US $ 100, 0000 billion to China; therefore, trade in the two countries increases deficiency for USA.

4. Beginning of privatization in China !
After passing away of Mao in the year 1979, Deng came to power. He counted out Karl Marx and made the economy of the country more market-oriented; showed green signal to privatization.'

 

[Godless-Kafir]

I predict in another two months if Electricity shortage is sorted and power comes to normal the GDP growth will shoot up as production will increase.

India lags behind only because of poor government or else most people here are far more business minded than chinese.

 

[Bangalorean]

This analysis is too needlessly complicated. I have said it many times before, there is just one reason that India is lagging behind China. Chinese were fortunate that thug Mao died in 1978, allowing Deng to take power and dismantle the hideous communist system. India achieved the good fortune to get rid of NehruGandhi socialism only in 1991.

Some of the reasons given in this summary are ridiculous. No bribing in China? LOL - this piece seems to have been written by some clueless middle class armchair phoren-obsessed Indian with no idea of ground realities. No system of pushing money into policeman's hands? the author of this piece needs to wake up.

 

[sehwag1830]

And why should we compare ourselve to China whose sole aim is to make money at all cost by hook or by crook. We should rather try to achieve things already done by South Korea, Japan while not becoming a 50th, 51st state of USA.

 

[sehwag1830]

And btw do you think Indian opposition party will allow Indian govt. to invest savings of hard working people on American bond. Parliament will be disrupted every day if we spend trillion $ on US bonds.

So India and China are very different country.

 

[kickok1975]

It's hard for anyone to compete with China when the sleeping giant is fully awakened. China is in fact still suffering communism and didn't get a healthy growth she deserves. Wait until China becomes a normalized country as her fellow sisters like Hong Kong, Taiwan then people will have opportunity to see the full potential of Chinese people.

However, it is not to say India can't catch up with China forever. Every country has her boom and doom time, India's glory is yet to come and hold by the will and determination of Indian people.

 

[tony4562]

It's hard for anyone to compete with China when the sleeping giant is fully awakened. China is in fact still suffering communism and didn't get a healthy growth she deserves. Wait until China becomes a normalized country as her fellow sisters like Hong Kong, Taiwan then people will have opportunity to see the full potential of Chinese people.

However, it is not to say India can't catch up with China forever. Every country has her boom and doom time, India's glory is yet to come and hold by the will and determination of Indian people.

Inida will not catch up on China and I give you one word for reason: race. To this day, no country with dark-skinned majority population has managed to develop into a modern society. If you look at the newly industrialized countries(regions) in Asia, Taiwan, Singapore, Hongkong, S.Korea all have pale.skinned north east asians as majority population, not to mention Japan. Do you think that is a coincidence that the Phillipines have failed to develope a tiger economy despite of having all the same 'ingredients' Taiwan or S.Korea had? In fact, the ranking of Asean countries in GDP per capital fully matches the percentage ranking of chinese as a share of the local population (Singapore > Malysia > Thailand > Indonesia), is that merely a coincidence? generally pale skin equals high IQ, and a society needs to have a 90 average in order to develop. All east asian countries score 100 or above whereas south asian or southeast asian countries all score 90 or less, there is just no comparison.

 

[Dovah]

Just a few days back, a few Chicoms were crying themselves hoarse over how racist Indians and this forum generally is. Wonder where they are now.

 

[Dovah]

In fact, the ranking of Asean countries in GDP per capital fully matches the percentage ranking of chinese as a share of the local population (Singapore > Malysia > Thailand > Indonesia), is that merely a coincidence?

Then how does one explain China, which has largest population of Chinese having the least per capita income than all of the countries mentioned.

That's a pretty fail logic, pale skinned genius.

generally pale skin equals high IQ, and a society needs to have a 90 average in order to develop.

Perhaps the Chinese did not have pale skin for the better half of the century since their nation wouldn't exactly be classified as the most developed ones until after the last decade or so.

 

[tony4562]

Just a few days back, a few Chicoms were crying themselves hoarse over how racist Indians and this forum generally is. Wonder where they are now.

Don´t mix up scientic findings with racism. The few decent african countries with a decent living all have sizeable white population, is that again a coincidence?

 

[Dovah]

Don´t mix up scientic findings with racism. The few decent african countries with a decent living all have sizeable white population, is that again a coincidence?

Scientific findings? More like retarded bullshit.

. The few decent african countries with a decent living all have sizeable white population, is that again a coincidence?

Mexico has higher per capita income than China. Coincidence?

 

[no smoking]

And why should we compare ourselve to China whose sole aim is to make money at all cost by hook or by crook. We should rather try to achieve things already done by South Korea, Japan while not becoming a 50th, 51st state of USA.

Learning Japan and South Korea? Do you really know what you are talking about?
China is learning exactly Japan and South korea.
All the bad things that are happening in China today already happened in these two countries before: pollution, sweatshop, oppression, riots...... you name it.

 

[tony4562]

Then how does one explain China, which has largest population of Chinese having the least per capita income than all of the countries mentioned.

That's a pretty fail logic, pale skinned genius.





Perhaps the Chinese did not have pale skin for the better half of the century since their nation wouldn't exactly be classified as the most developed ones until after the last decade or so.

Have you heard of communism? That throws out all the basics. N.Korea is as poor as a rat in the church, yet s.korea is quite the opposite, ad in this world you won´t find another country where the population is as homogenous as the koreans. then think of w.germany vs e.germany.

Communism is truely a failed theory, too bad China wasted 30+ precious years because of it. But in the last 3 decades no major country has been developing as fast as china, this once again shows the tenacity, inginorty and intelligence of the north east asian people when they are given the freedom they need. CCP likes to take credit for china´s development, but it is the chinese who deserve all the praise.

 

[tony4562]

Scientific findings? More like retarded bullshit.



Mexico has higher per capita income than China. Coincidence?

I´ve been to Mexico and an host of chinese cities. I can tell you that Mexico doesn´t even hold candle to he developed part of china. And mexicans aren´t too bad, they have mixed european and american indian ancestry. It won´t surprise me if the avg IQ in mexico is higher than 90.

 

[Dovah]

Have you heard of communism? That throws out all the basics. N.Korea is as poor as a rat in the church, yet s.korea is quite the opposite, ad in this world you won´t find another country where the population is as homogenous as the koreans. then think of w.germany vs e.germany.

Communism is truely a failed theory, too bad China wasted 30+ precious years because of it. But in the last 3 decades no major country has been developing as fast as china, this once again shows the tenacity, inginorty and intelligence of the north east asian people when they are given the freedom they need. CCP likes to take credit for china´s development, but it is the chinese who deserve all the praise.

And we were socialist economy for a decade more than China, ever thought the same rules could apply here. Guess you were too busy in cooking up "scientific" theories to even bother reading about little history.

Makes you feel sad knowing that you're not special, doesn't it?

this once again shows the tenacity, inginorty and intelligence of the north east asian people when they are given the freedom they need.

If anything, thank the CCP for providing you with the man power and sweatshops to drive your economy. Its not the tenacity and intelligence, its simple low wage labour.

 

[tony4562]

Name one country with dark skinned majority that has succeeded to industrialize? Rich oil countries in ME don´t count.

The answer is none, it does not exist.

 

[Dovah]

I´ve been to Mexico and an host of chinese cities. I can tell you that Mexico doesn´t even hold candle to he developed part of china. And mexicans aren´t too bad, they have mixed european and american indian ancestry. It won´t surprise me if the avg IQ in mexico is higher than 90.

So what happened to the "pale-skin" you specifically mentioned? Btw, average Mexican IQ is 87.

The more developed parts of China are simply mirages, created by CCP.

 

[The Messiah]

Name one country with dark skinned majority that has succeeded to industrialize? Rich oil countries in ME don´t count.

The answer is none, it does not exist.

egyptian civilization you fool.

 

[civfanatic]

Tony the White Wannabe,

Do you even know what is IQ and what it is used to measure? Do you know how IQ is calculated? Do you know why IQ is calculated, and the history behind IQ calculation?

You might want to find out the answers to these questions before peddling your racist pseudo-scientific theories and making a laughing stock of yourself on public forums (assuming, of course, that you are being serious and not just trolling).

 

[tony4562]

And we were socialist economy for a decade more than China, ever thought the same rules could apply here. Guess you were too busy in cooking up "scientific" theories to even bother reading about little history.

Makes you feel sad knowing that you're not special, doesn't it?



If anything, thank the CCP for providing you with the man power and sweatshops to drive your economy. Its not the tenacity and intelligence, its simple low wage labour.

Socialism is good, scandinavian countries are all socialistic, i don´t think the people there regret a bit the path they took. Communism is bad, don´t mix those things up. What is communism? It means the state owns everything and you can´t even sell an egg in the street. Was India like this prior 1991, the anser was obviously not. India had billionars just like she has today, and much of india´s economy was already in private hands. In many ways India was more capitalistic 20 years ago than China is now.