Why is China developing missile defense system?

Impluseblade

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
306
Likes
36
China's development of more capable theater missile defense systems addresses what for China is a practically non-existent threat," Fisher said. "Other than North Korea and to a slight degree India, no country has the ability to target China with medium or intermediate range missiles."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
China, U.S. conduct missile defense tests | Washington Free Beacon

China on Sunday conducted the second test of a new anti-ballistic missile defense interceptor that United States officials say is directly linked to Beijing's secret anti-satellite weapons program.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon on Sunday announced it conducted a successful test of a long-range anti-missile interceptor.

China's Defense Ministry announced the test, according to the official state-run Xinhua news agency, which quoted an official saying "the test has reached the preset goal."

"The test is defensive in nature and targets no other country," the official was quoted as saying.

China in the past has opposed U.S. missile defenses, claiming the systems are designed to weaponize space. However, Beijing refused to discuss any details of its secret ASAT program. A 2007 ASAT missile destroyed a Chinese weather satellite, creating a debris field that threatens both manned and unmanned satellites.

It is the second time China announced such a missile test. A similar anti-missile interception test was successfully conducted on Jan. 11, 2010.

The test was not unexpected. U.S. officials said Chinese missile defense testing facilities were under close intelligence surveillance since early January amid signs a missile defense interceptor test was to be carried out.

The Washington Free Beacon reported in September that new intelligence had indicated the Chinese were planning to fire what they called a Dong Ning-2 anti-satellite missile that is part of Beijing's program to target U.S. military communications, navigation, and targeting satellites in space.

Pentagon officials had no immediate comment on the Chinese test.

Maj. Catherine Wilkinson, a Pentagon spokeswoman, earlier this month declined to comment on Chinese plans for an ASAT test, citing a policy of not discussing intelligence matters.

"We carefully monitor China's military developments and urge China to exhibit greater transparency regarding its capabilities and intention," she said. "Military-to-military dialogues between the United States and China featuring open and substantive discussions between our armed forces will help us improve mutual understanding, build trust, and reduce the risk of misperception and miscalculations."

A U.S. official said earlier this month there were signs in China that the missile defense test was being readied.

Regarding the 2010 test, a State Department cable, disclosed by Wikileaks, revealed that China had launched an SC-18 missile from the Korla Peninsula and intercepted a near-simultaneous launched CSS-X-11 medium-range target missile from the Shuangchengzi Space and Missile Center.

The cable noted the similarities between the missile defense interceptor and China's ASAT missile. "An SC-19 was used previously as the payload booster for the Jan. 11, 2007, direct-ascent anti-satellite (DA-ASAT) intercept of the Chinese FY-1C weather satellite," the cable said. "Previous SC-19 DA-ASAT flight-tests were conducted in 2005 and 2006. This test is assessed to have furthered both Chinese ASAT and ballistic missile defense technologies."

Richard Fisher, a China military affairs specialist, said the latest test also was carried out over Korla, China's traditional center for anti-missile research dating to the 1960s.

"So far the missile used for the Jan. 27 test has not been identified," Fisher, with the International Assessment and Strategy Center, said. "It could be a second test of the SC-19 ASAT missile modified for warhead interception for the January 2010 test, or it could be a new missile."

Fisher said China is known to be developing several anti-missile systems. "One system sometimes referred to as the HQ-26 appears to be intended to have a capability similar to the Raytheon-built SM-3 [interceptor], the main system used by the U.S. Navy for missile defense," he said.

"China's new missile is expected to arm a new large PLA Navy combat ship that has not yet been launched and is also expected to have a land-deployed version as well."

According to reports from China, an engineer from the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), the state-run company most likely behind development of a HQ-26-like missile, has received a national prize for the development of a dual-pulse rocket engine, a technology also used on the SM-3, Fisher said.

"China's development of more capable theater missile defense systems addresses what for China is a practically non-existent threat," Fisher said. "Other than North Korea and to a slight degree India, no country has the ability to target China with medium or intermediate range missiles."

-----------
Dear Indian members, please email the author and tell him that he is deadly wrong on India's capacity.
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
.

"China's new missile is expected to arm a new large PLA Navy combat ship that has not yet been launched and is also expected to have a land-deployed version as well."

Interesting, I wonder if it is the new cruiser that everyone is talking about. 055?
According to reports from China, an engineer from the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), the state-run company most likely behind development of a HQ-26-like missile, has received a national prize for the development of a dual-pulse rocket engine, a technology also used on the SM-3, Fisher said.

"China's development of more capable theater missile defense systems addresses what for China is a practically non-existent threat," Fisher said. "Other than North Korea and to a slight degree India, no country has the ability to target China with medium or intermediate range missiles."

-----------
Duh, it is meant for NK and India.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
The author missed US missiles in SoKo and Japan and the SLBMs of US. Yeah China needs BMD
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
[PDF][/PDF]
The author missed US missiles in SoKo and Japan and the SLBMs of US. Yeah China needs BMD
Surely they are not medium or intermediate range missiles? I dont think US SSBNs carry those either.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
[PDF][/PDF]

Surely they are not medium or intermediate range missiles? I dont think US SSBNs carry those either.
Your program has begun by testing defence against medium range missiles and will then widen to ICBM. India too doing the same.

Off course the US does not need ICBMs to lob from SoKo or Jap. Or even Taiwan if need be :D
 

average american

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
1,540
Likes
441
Your program has begun by testing defence against medium range missiles and will then widen to ICBM. India too doing the same.

Off course the US does not need ICBMs to lob from SoKo or Jap. Or even Taiwan if need be :D
US Navy has 11,000 missile, USA does not have a lot of ground based missles
 

huaxia rox

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,401
Likes
103
"China's development of more capable theater missile defense systems addresses what for China is a practically non-existent threat," Fisher said. "Other than North Korea and to a slight degree India, no country has the ability to target China with medium or intermediate range missiles."
this is indeed the weirdest part.....the only obvious reason chinese can think of is to counter the poential interfere from the US when prc has to deal with the taiwan issue in a way no one now wants to see.......there are many nations have ability to attack prc with ballistic missiles like NK russia EU india pak etc etc.......but who will go to protect taiwan???anyone other than the US?

so how come chinese dont have reasons to develop this???
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
this is indeed the weirdest part.....the only obvious reason chinese can think of is to counter the poential interfere from the US when prc has to deal with the taiwan issue in a way no one now wants to see.......there are many nations have ability to attack prc with ballistic missiles like NK russia EU india pak etc etc.......but who will go to protect taiwan???anyone other than the US?

so how come chinese dont have reasons to develop this???
Glad to know that you reckon your missiles with Pakistan as threat.

Threat to Chinese in East Turkistan and in Tibet !! Threat to chinese in Gwadar port !!
 

GromHellscream

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
274
Likes
33
Because we are fan of US, and want to be as cool as them.

Unknown = MKV
Unknown (Tested this time) = GBI
HQ19 = THAAD
HQ26 = SM-3
HQ29 = PAC-3
HQ9 = PAC-2
HQ16GA = SM-2
HQ16GB = ESSM
HQ9G = SM-6
HQ10 = RAM
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top