Why is China allied with Pakistan?

Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
Asking again please provide a link that Pakistan has a 10 kiloton yield nuke.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
Pakistan Nuclear Weapons

boosted device?] 28 May 1998 25-36 kiloton total 9-12 kiloton
Fission device 28 May 1998 12 kiloton
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Fission device 30 May 1998 12 kiloton 4-6 kiloton
Fission device not detonated 12 kiloton --
This table lists the nuclear tests that Pakistan claims to have carried out in May 1998 as well as the announced yields. Other sources have reported lower yields than those claimed by Pakistan. The Southern Arizona Seismic Observatory reports that the total seismic yield for the May 28th tests was 9-12 kilotons and that the yield for the May 30th tests was 4-6 kilotons.

click link to get a better chart
 
Last edited:

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Pakistan Nuclear Weapons

boosted device?] 28 May 1998 25-36 kiloton total 9-12 kiloton
Fission device 28 May 1998 12 kiloton
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Low-yield device 28 May 1998 sub-kiloton --
Fission device 30 May 1998 12 kiloton 4-6 kiloton
Fission device not detonated 12 kiloton --
This table lists the nuclear tests that Pakistan claims to have carried out in May 1998 as well as the announced yields. Other sources have reported lower yields than those claimed by Pakistan. The Southern Arizona Seismic Observatory reports that the total seismic yield for the May 28th tests was 9-12 kilotons and that the yield for the May 30th tests was 4-6 kilotons.

click link to get a better chart

let suppose i do agree with you

if we had 36kt yield capability in 1998
imagine what would had been our capability now?

5mt..yepp.

5 such can destroy south asia
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
Pakistan Nuclear Testing

Pakistani claims concerning the number and yields of their underground tests cannot be independently confirmed by seismic means, and it has been suggested by Indian sources that as few as two weapons were actually detonated, each with yields considerably lower than claimed by Pakistan. Initially, seismic data was interpreted as indicating at least two and possibily a third, much smaller, test in the initial round of tests at the Ras Koh range. Subsequent analysis, however, confirmed at least one test on 28 May, though the possibility of two additional tests was not excluded. The single test on 30 May provided a clear seismic signal.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
your providing western and international figure

while for india i have provided there own nuclear scientist.clearly mentioned that nt only the yield was low bt test failed as well
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - 1998: The Year of Testing


Test: Chagai-I
Time: 10:16:15.8 28 May 1998 (UCT) USGS;
10:16:17.6 UCT (PIDC)
Location: Ras Koh mountains, Chagai District,
Baluchistan Province, Pakistan
28.7919 deg N, 64.9475 deg E
Test Height and Type: Multiple device (5?, 2?) in underground
horizontal tunnel, 1000 m long
Yield: approx. 9 kt (5-20 kt possible range;
claimed yields range from 18 kt to 40 kt)
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
your providing western and international figure

while for india i have provided there own nuclear scientist.clearly mentioned that nt only the yield was low bt test failed as well
Western data uses real seismic data like in the links i gave you not lies or dream or
hyped numbers.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
This test was reported to be 40 kilotons but the reality way 4-6 kilotons. Gave you atleast
4 links.
show me any source from pakistani scientist/agency saying the yyield was 4-6kt

sorry i believe in my own country agencies than anyone else
so does i believe more in the indian nuclear scientist.
despite the fact that i even dnt know his name.bt he has become my fav personality from india after zakir naik
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Western data uses real seismic data like in the links i gave you not lies or dream or
hyped numbers.
so does pakistani sources

none of the western agency was present at the test site bt pakistani were

hence believe in pakistani only

opposite to this believe in the indian nuclear scientist as well
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
so does pakistani sources

none of the western agency was present at the test site bt pakistani were

hence believe in pakistani only

opposite to this believe in the indian nuclear scientist as well
You told me you are educated so you would know data does not change.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
@LETHALFORCE

But i believe in my own agencies more and would believe in PAEC statement more than any other.

hence 36-40kt warhead yield(largest one)

you should also believe in the indian nuclear scientist
 
Last edited by a moderator:

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
@LETHALFORCE

But i believe in my own agencies more and would believe in PAEC statement more than any other.

hence 36-40kt warhead yield(largest one)

you should also believe in the indian nuclear scientist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,597
Country flag
@LETHALFORCE

But i believe in my own agencies more and would believe in PAEC statement more than any other.

hence 36-40kt warhead yield(largest one)

you should also believe in the indian nuclear scientist
This turned out to be 4-6 kiloton yield, why such a huge variance?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top