Why India is not a great scientific power

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
As an outsider, I can come up with 3 reasons:
1. Money!
2. Money!
3. Money!
I think you've got it reverse here. India is not the richest of nations because we are not a great scientific power.
Industrial Revolution?
 

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
Deleted...........................
 
Last edited:

lemontree

Professional
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
815
Likes
647
The education system has to evolve. We have not changed much in the education process.
Reservation policy is another inderance. When one does not have to strive for any improvement then ehy would he or she strive.
 

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,963
Likes
1,803
Country flag
When nearly all the scientists in America are from INDIA, how will INDIA become a GREAT SCIENTIFIC POWER. The GoI is not ready to pay for the SCIENTISTS, so we cannot expect them to be in INDIA.
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,010
Likes
2,308
Country flag
I think you've got it reverse here. India is not the richest of nations because we are not a great scientific power.
Industrial Revolution?
No, all you are talking about invlove money!

Education development or reform? you need money to buy latest equipment and recruit best teachers. You also need to provide financial support to those talent students who cannot afford education fees.


Setting up world-class lab? you need huge amount investment in everything, from machine to people. Most importantly, you have a big budget for every strange idea of each scientific freak in your lab. These ideas may cost you a fortune without producing any valuable result.

Building a factory to produce the new product based on the new idea? Money talks! Billions of dollars may already be spent even before the first product appears.

Is that the end? No, now you have to put your product into market which means a millions or billions dollars promotion unless you want to knock the every door yourselves.

So, now you can see how expensive it is to be a scientific power.
 

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
No, all you are talking about invlove money!

Education development or reform? you need money to buy latest equipment and recruit best teachers. You also need to provide financial support to those talent students who cannot afford education fees.


Setting up world-class lab? you need huge amount investment in everything, from machine to people. Most importantly, you have a big budget for every strange idea of each scientific freak in your lab. These ideas may cost you a fortune without producing any valuable result.

Building a factory to produce the new product based on the new idea? Money talks! Billions of dollars may already be spent even before the first product appears.

Is that the end? No, now you have to put your product into market which means a millions or billions dollars promotion unless you want to knock the every door yourselves.

So, now you can see how expensive it is to be a scientific power.
Its a cycle. Scientific research strengthens economy and and money augments research. I get your point, though.
 

agentperry

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
3,022
Likes
690
to clarify my some mis-conceptions.

the same article that i had originally posted had graphics which i somehow couldnot post or may be i forgot to post wateva. that India spends more on research than china but no of scientists and research scholars are way less than china.

paucity of human resources. not money resources.

and yes im talking about civilian research
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
Nirmalya Kumar and Phanish Puranam are Professors at the London Business School (LBS). They are also co-directors for the Aditya V. Birla India Centre at the B-school. Working together they have just written India Inside - The Emerging Challenge to The West which has been published by the Harvard Business School Press. In this interview, they speak to CD on how India is gradually becoming the innovation hub for the West. Excerpts:

What made you write this book?

Phanish: Thomas Friedman's The World is Flat made a number of good points about how India has become a destination for providing services to the rest of the world. But there is something in it that we did not agree with, which was the presumption that this was a steady state. India is good for services but the innovative work will continue to stay in the West and that's what will keep the West competitive globally. So the question we are really trying to answer in this book is, 'Can India be in innovation what it already is in services for the rest of the world?' And the answer is yes.

So where are the Indian Googles, iPads and Viagras?

Phanish: That is a wrong question to ask. The question is heavily biased towards thinking about innovation as products which are made for end consumers around the world. As I just said, that is not the only kind of innovation. So yes, I don't think there are any Googles, iPads or Viagras on the table today, but that has nothing to do with whether Indians are doing innovation that impacts the world.

Nirmalya: India can be the innovation hub for the world without doing any Googles, iPads and Viagras for the rest of their lives.

Can you elaborate on that?

Nirmalya: When multinational companies innovated earlier, the whole process was in R&D labs in the home country. Today what they do is that the break up that project into three or four sub-projects and do them in parallel. One may be done in Japan, one in Germany and one in the US. But one of the parts always comes to India. And that's why 700-750 MNCs have set up R&D labs in India.

Which companies have done this?

Phanish: GE's Jack Welch lab in Bangalore. What they are doing is a part of a very large set of projects, all of which are geared towards making, say, a new turbine jet engine. The Bangalore lab does some of the design, testing and simulation work. And the other labs around the world do other parts. All of this is integrated to make the final jet engine. That's what gets sold to a company like Boeing. Boeing as a customer will see GE's brand on it, but nowhere will it be said that it is made in India or there is an Indian component in there. But that doesn't make the Indian innovation less critical.

In fact, it makes irrelevant the question of where it was designed, because it wasn't designed in any place. The same is true for Intel. If you look at the chip development and process development teams of Intel, they are distributed around the US, Israel and increasingly, in India. In fact, the Indian centre has now overtaken the Israeli one. Again, we have the Intel Inside brand, but there is no way to tell how much of it came from Israel versus India. What we are trying to argue is that there are significant Indian contributions here which clearly are innovative and create value, but they are not seen by the end consumer.

Which are the innovations in India that you are most excited about?

Nirmalya: The GSD ( Global Software Development) model is perhaps India's biggest innovation in recent times. All the innovation that is taking place in India would not be possible if we did not have the GSD model. Indian companies have become excellent at being able to take a geographical co-located task, separate it and then put it together again.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top