Tibet belonged to China .
Of course , all muslin countries are support China muslin strategy , but most west country oppose.
cuckboiii..... You've been here for too long and you don't even know how close to reality most Indians are. Things like untouchability and racism can never be eradicated from a society. Some fuckers in some remote area of a large country can still practice it without coming into the limelight and this is the honest and brutal truth.
Tibet is Dharmic land and it will be under the saffron flag in the near future.
Hitler intentionally allowed British forces to escape.
british empire is the #1 reason why germany lost ww2
Germany had planned air raids in Coventry but British had made to intercept their info. Yet their defenses weren't put up and Germans killed thousands.
and by 1942 RAF was turning german cities into dante's infernos
Well, Nazi German was certainly evil, there is no doubt about this. But US was not an innocent school boy either.
Oh, no, US wanted nothing but dominant role in the world. They were the one first suggesting League of Nations. When they realise that they couldn't control this league, they back out. Instead, they were the one providing funds and military technologies for Germany re-arming.
No, US had finished their mission 50 years earlier before WW2 on a far larger scale - Indians.
You forget to mention those pollical, economical and military condition attached to this Martial Plan. Under this plan, everyone became Yankee's bitch.
You again forget another fact: Until Jul 1941, USA had always been the top supplier to Japan on strategic goods, such as oil, steel, machines, financial loan etc, etc. Around 60-80% of these critical supplies came from them. Without their support, Japanese had to stopped their war in 1938 by financial collapse.
The only reason they did that was to contain the communism. Just look at the geographical positions of Japan and 4 tigers. They were all critical for containing USSR and China. On the other hand, other Asian countries were not so lucky.
Yes, they were also the reason that we had to fight 8 years not 1 year.
You call that help? You forget all these were not free. Then, I also say that Chinese bought the wasted American manufacture capacity at premium price and selling Chinese products at peanut price, in fact keeping ordinary Americans' living standard in a declining income. Should they be grateful?
Not true. First, the British Army and US Army in 1941-42 were still were not trained properly to counter the professional German army. That's why instead of landing in France and be annihilated by a superior German force the Western allies first focused in the Desert were the mainly faced Italian and later on much smaller and detached (from mainland Europe) German army under Rommel. Second, until 1943 the Atlantic convoy was not yet secure as the allies have not yet closed the u-boat gap. So America cannot risk sending sufficient materiele to Europe or additional supplies needed to start a sustain a Western front from France. Third, until the end of 1943 the Western allies have not yet mastered the skies over France. Thus any invading force landing on France would be in dsnger of Luftwaffe attacks. That's why the bomb8ng on German cities were intensified to draw in Luftwaffe fighters. And the strategy was successful. Luftwaffe fighters were annihilated not over France but over Germany.
You mean the NAZIS simply mass murdered millions Jewish, Gypsies, gays, liberal thinkers and Communists in Europe? No big deal right? Anyway, Stalin would kill almost the same number of his own people in the USSR during his bloody reign and thousands of Polish intelligentia, political and military leadership after Stalin's successful alliance with Hitler (yes, Stalin and Hitler were allies at the start of WW2)...
armyhistory.org
No, Stalin had to accept Hitler's "peace" offer because UK and France turned down or ignored Soviet's alliance offer in multiple meetings. UK/France attitude towards Hilter entrance into Czech made Stalin believe that Western countries were encouraging Hitler to attack Soviet. So, he just did what British and France did - turn Hitler's attention to the other side and won himself some times.
No, everyone knew that Nazi couldn't conquer Britain after Dunkirk.
Poland did not want an alliance with Stalin as it would be suicide. So UK and France initially was cool to Stalin. But after Czechoslovakian invasion and it became clear that Hitler would not be pacified by a few lollipops Britain this time approached Stalin but Stalin changed his mind he want an alliance Hitler.
The Stalin-Hitler love fest happened before the start of WW2. In fact without Stalin's alliance with Hitler it is doubtful that Hitler would have invaded Poland for it meant he would have to fight UK-France and the USSR at once. Most likely there would have been no WW2.
That was not true.
See, this is an issue: there was no trust on both sides. Westerners believed that Stalin was planning to take over the whole world while Stalin and Russians believed that West was using Hitler as their tool of destroying Soviet. They got good reasons to think so:
Nazi Germany was not as strong as they claim, but UK/France were even worse. Their soldiers didn’t receive enough training, troops lacked experienced officers, weapons, transport vehicle/horse, fuel, ammunition for a long war. The fact that their troops didn’t do anything during the whole Poland invasion tells you their readiness. The simple fact you don’t know is: the mobilization of France was even finished until the day she stopped fighting.
Your point of view was not supported by any fact.
