- Joined
- Nov 17, 2011
- Messages
- 380
- Likes
- 64
True Communism is this, no Prime Minister, no Queen, no Dictator and absolutely no government. The people are in control. The people work as a group. To change the system, one would have to change the people. This can be simplified with Give what you have, take what you need and work as hard as you can..Dont forget there is no communist state in the world, (never was). USSR, China etc were one step before the ultimate communist state and remained stuck in that. Communist society is a classless , stateless society and no countries have achieved to reach up to that level. USSR or China or someothers just could reach upto 'Dictatorship of working class'(in reality dictatorship of general secretaries). Marx thought it will lead to a stateless classless society but it never happened.
I believe true (ideal is a better word) form of society lies in between these two extreme forms- capitalism and communism- there should be incentives for induvidual quality or work but there should be check on unbounded accumulation.
I whole heartedly support communist view to religion and god,
The good side of Communism is mainly the ideology created by Karl and Engels, not the implementation by Lenin and Stalin. This is because what Lenin and Stalin achieved was NOT Communism; it was more like dictatorship.It was dictatorship now because of three things:
1. Because Stalin acted as a ruler, this automatically created a government.
2. The food rations where reduced for the population but not for Stalin, this is hardly a classless society.
3. And finally, in the original ideology of Communism, the poor should get richer, and the rich get poorer. Exactly the opposite of what was happening.
1. Because Stalin acted as a ruler, this automatically created a government.
2. The food rations where reduced for the population but not for Stalin, this is hardly a classless society.
3. And finally, in the original ideology of Communism, the poor should get richer, and the rich get poorer. Exactly the opposite of what was happening.