I went through the entire thread looking for your sources. You have exactly five. Four mention French exports to China and one mentions Rosboronexport. It only mentions how Russia is afraid of their mig 29 getting undercut by JF 17. No where does it mention them complaining about the L 15.
You said "L15 is not a copy" Rosboronexport said "L15 is a cheap COPY." You want to try that again?
I do not expect you to do that. I do however expect you to provide recent sources.
Doesn't matter if they said it yesterday or last year. You want to try that again?
If they are then provide recent sources for it.
I did by posting Motor Sich website engine information. L15 is indeed powered by the AI-222 as your own flightglobal source says the engine is from Ukraine. Motor Sich is the only company there that makes them. You want to try that again?
You missed several links, like Motor Sich, Segolene Royal... ect. You want to try that again?
You seem to make comments without either recent or relevant sources. Don't let that stop you from commenting. If you are somehow insinuating I lack free speech then don't bother America beats France in that aspect.
I cite manufacturer websites, reputable defense news... nothing more relevant and recent than that. You copy cat my sentence too... definitely Chinese. You have more so you try to censor me? Definitely Chinese...
You provide a few sources that have nothing to do with the L-15. You have not provided a single source that even mentions the L 15 even in passing. Until you do all your statements will be presumed to be hearsay nothing more.
Read Defense News again... it mentions L-15. You want to try that again?
They are trying to export the plane to the U.S. How would lying about the specifications help win them the contract? And no you have not shown any sources for how they have not so stop making stuff up.
How would lying about it help win a contract? Are you really that clueless?? lol
If they can bid for whatever they want then stop making up all sorts of reasons for why the can't. Otherwise this comment directly refutes your previous claims.
I didn't say bid for it, I said China can offer it. US won't even look at it.
I have read some of your responses on other threads. They are either one liners or make absurd claims with no sources to back it up.
I read your comments and sources here. A) you speak about what you do not know and B) you don't read your sources or mine. Stick around, maybe you can learn something from l'ecole d'Armand2REP.