USSR vs. USA in Railroads

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
Just a summary in thew first post .. will upload pictures later on also do contribute

The efficiency of the Soviet Railways improved over time and by the 1980s had many performance indicators superior to the United States. Railroads built in the USSR were planned, and in contrast to the US, only a single railroad line would be constructed between major cities. This avoided the situation in the US where two (or sometimes more) railroad companies would construct lines that more or less paralleled each other resulting in wasteful duplication of effort. But most of the rail lines in the USSR were inherited from the Russian Empire which had also avoided such duplication.
As a result of having a shorter rail system plus more freight traffic, the USSR had a freight traffic density (in ton-km per km of line) 6-7 times higher than the US. In the US, the mean daily freight car mileage was only 95 km. vs. 227 km. for the USSR. The percent of freight car miles that ran empty was 41% for the US vs. 29% for the USSR. It was claimed that labor productivity rose 4.3 fold between 1955 and 1980, resulting in the USSR being roughly the same as the US (after taking into account that the USSR hauled a greater proportion of non-bulk commodities which were more labor intensive to haul—more switching of cars, etc.).
However, the reliability of locomotives in the USSR was much worse than for the US. Their high traffic density often resulted in traffic congestion and delays, especially after an accident blocked the line.
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
Great thread A.V.

I am particularly interested in seeing more pictures of the Baikal Amur Magistral or BAM.

While those of the TransSib are plenty, BAM seems to elude us all. Whatever I can get out of Google search does not satisfy my curiosity.

Thanks
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top