guy, ranting with bold characters can not make you words more persuasive.
1. CHinese PM' words you quoted are just polite formula speech...
BTW, China's leaders ,France leaders and USA leaders all once expressed that they support India to get a veto of UNSC. but those were also all polite formula speech.
So, pls don't take such formula speech too seriously!
2. USA and USSR have deployed real ICBM and made them aimed at Beijing for decades,which were much more powerful than India's untested short-legged Agni V
....USA has deployed F22 around CHina,which is much more advanced than SU30.
But so what? as long as CHina has its own nukes and can destroy potential enemies, any other's nuke would be all useless and luxery toys to CHina,however advanced those nukes are.
BTW, compared with nukes of USA, Russia and CHina, india's Agni V will be still very primitive, even if it is tested sucessessfully.
Not primitive .....
Agni 5 Missile
The Advanced Systems Laboratory (ASL) in Hyderabad, which develops Indias strategic (long-range, nuclear-tipped) missiles, has dramatically increased the options for its forthcoming Agni-5 missile by making it highly road-mobile, or easily transportable by road.
That enables the Agni-5 to reach targets far beyond its stated 5,000-km range by quickly moving closer to the target. In a hypothetical war against, say, Sweden, an Agni-5 launcher, stationed near Bangalore, would be unable to strike Stockholm, 7,000 km away. But moving by road to Amritsar would bring Stockholm within range.
Similarly, moving the Agni-5 to northeast India would bring even Harbin, Chinas northernmost city, within striking range. From various places across India, the Agni-5 can reach every continent except North and South America.
The Agni-5 will be the first canisterised, road-mobile missile in Indias arsenal, similar to the Dongfeng-31A that created ripples during Chinas National Day Military Parade in Beijing on October 1. Indias current long-range missile, the Agni-3, a non-canisterised missile, can only be moved with difficulty from one place to another.
In many other respects, the Agni-5, which is scheduled to make its first flight in early-2011, carries forward the Agni-3 pedigree. With composites used extensively to reduce weight, and a third stage added on (the Agni-3 was a two-stage missile), the Agni-5 can fly 1,500 km further than the 3,500-km Agni-3.
The Agni-5 is specially tailored for road-mobility, explains Avinash Chander, Director, ASL. With the canister having been successfully developed, all Indias future land-based strategic missiles will be canisterised as well.
Made of maraging steel, a canister must provide a hermitically sealed atmosphere that preserves the missile for years. During firing, the canister must absorb enormous stresses when a thrust of 300to 400 tonnes is generated to eject the 50-tonne missile.
Canister technology was first developed in India for the Brahmos cruise missile. But it was the K-15 underwater-launched missile, developed here in Hyderabad for Indias nuclear-powered submarine, INS Arihant, which fully overcame the technological hurdles in canisterising ballistic missiles.
Another major technological breakthrough that will beef up the Agni-5 is ASLs success in developing and testing MIRVs (multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles). An MIRV, atop an Agni-5 missile, comprises three to 10 separate nuclear warheads. Each warhead can be assigned to a separate target, separated by hundreds of kilometres; alternatively, two or more warheads can be assigned to one target.
We have made major progress on the MIRVs in the last two years, is all that Avinash Chander is willing to say on the subject.
Nevertheless, extensive testing still lies ahead for this highly complex technology. MIRVs will be deployed on the Agni-5 only after another 4-5 years.
While MIRV technology is similar to launching multiple satellites through a space rocket, a missile requires far greater accuracy. A satellite would be considered in correct orbit even it is a kilometre higher or lower than planned.
But each warhead in an MIRV must impact within 40 metres of its target. With such high accuracies, even small nuclear warheads are sufficient for the job.
Strategic planners consider MIRVs essential, given Indias declared no first use nuclear policy. Even after an enemy has hit India with a full-fledged nuclear strike, destroying or incapacitating much of the strategic arsenal, a handful of surviving Indian missiles must be capable of retaliating with massive and unacceptable damage. Multiple warheads on a handful of Agni-5 missiles would constitute such a capability.
MIRVs also enable a single missile to overwhelm the enemys missile defences. Tracking and shooting down multiple warheads are far more difficult than intercepting a single warhead.
Providing each warhead with the capability to manoeuvre, and dodge enemy interceptor missiles, increases survivability further. The MIRV warheads are also being given electronic packages for jamming enemy radars
Indian warhead, fighters or even missile quality is way ahead of Chinese amunition quality..........and who is their friend..Pakistan.....A Rogue state, dead already with debts and terrorist activities........even now China is infected by terrorist activities....say thanks to your paki friends for that.....
