- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 4,562
- Likes
- 2,572
Nukes are probably the most overrated thing in the history of mankind.
Indian support is not the same as launching the attack from indian side. I am referring more to US using Indian supply depots along our west coast, our bases for their bombers etc.are u serious...??when 3/4th of pakistani radars and corps are stationed on the Indian side u expect US to conduct a military ops from India...and secondly US has more logistical support from their bases from AF than from India...
You think that after what a 15 kiloton nuke did to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it ought not be over-rated? That too when we have super megaton range nukes these days.Nukes are probably the most overrated thing in the history of mankind.
No one in their leadership does that. Only some teens on steroids on the forums do that. Because if there is a nuke threat to us even if we are not involved, our NO FIRST USE policy automatically nullifies and we arm our nukes ready. Pakistanis don't want that.Pakis keep boasting/warning that they'll nuke India, if US tries to grab their nukes.
It only shows what scumbags they are.
That depends on what they can offer Russians, mate. Mind you, CAR is still Russian property despite the "unofficial dissolution" of Soviet Union. So far, the one thing that Russians are asking for territory and passage into Af-Pak WOT is equal share and participation in the nuclear missile shield cooperation that US is planning to put in Europe. That for some stupid reason, Obama is not accepting despite knowing that Russia is no long a threat to US and rather Jihad is.If USA has no other choice they can launch an operation from Central Asia. Long ranger bombers also can be used from anywhere.
Mate, as the pet line is US defense and administrative circles is "All options are on the table", so expect every option to be actually on the table. That of course includes, buying up Pakistani leaders, scientists, generals etc to divulge the secrets and get as much of the dirty work done as they can without making the situation more complex. You see, they can throw wads of dollars at those who are corrupt and they will sell every damn secret they know, anyway there are still some elements in defense circles who are willing to side with the Americans come what may, so such entities can also help.My question is: How? Even if it has all the info, which is not possible, how will it snatch and grab Pakistani nukes? They are not lying there assembled and ready in one place. Knowing Pakistani terrain, they could be anywhere between Balochistan and Chitral. It would take eons to find out all the nukes even if US manages to buy out a few generals and scientists.
As much as this mission is favorable, it is not practical. The only way they can do that is get all the top Pakistani officials (90% generals and scientists) either captured, maimed and interrogated, or simply killed so that the secret dies with them and no one else is able to use the nukes.
and how to u plan to enter paki after using Indian depots and are bases...??Indian support is not the same as launching the attack from indian side. I am referring more to US using Indian supply depots along our west coast, our bases for their bombers etc.
Pak Radars- since when has that been an issue for the US- remeber OBL raid. Also, if US Hornets launch an attack from the Arabian sea from their CBG and simultanouesly, US Falcons attack from Indian bases, how long due you think the Paki AF will lsat- a couple of hours at best. However, when anihilation is nigh, the danger is that the Pakis may resort to lobbing a few missiles on India out of frustration.....and that is going to be the deterrent for GOI to offer any support, at least overtly, to the US.
the only way I see this working is if Indian commits to troops wholeheartedly and the US and India launch a massive blitzkrieg that completely redifens the meaning of shock and awe- Israel may also chip in , esp thru covert ops behind enemy lines in taking out "key" installations. and of course, Russian involvement will be needed to keep China at bay- kind of a "if you step in, we step in" Russia is strong enuf even today for this threat to matter.
but at the end of the day, I dont see any of this coming true......would love for it to happen, but not holding my breath.
use china policy help Afghanistan give them weapons , money , support ,etcand how to u plan to enter paki after using Indian depots and are bases...??
how can u compare pakistan western border with eastern...? i said earlier also that 3/4th of paki radars are on are side of the border..which means any incursion can be challenged within sec...hell they will term this as Indian aggression!!
see i dont know how they will do it...but if they use any Indian bases or help that will mean full war by paki..GoI should have guts to take the aggression head on...because all the countries u mentioned are miles away from pakistan threat...it has to be very well thought out plan..
Which did more damage in terms of infrastructure destroyed and lives lost: the conventional fire-bombing of Tokyo or the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?You think that after what a 15 kiloton nuke did to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it ought not be over-rated? That too when we have super megaton range nukes these days.