U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

WARREN SS

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,428
Likes
20,436
Country flag
There is a big confusion some people trying to create that USA will sanction India there is no provision in CAASTA like that

USA only said that it will be difficult for them to share technology like fighters and drones with India due to Security reasons as Russians are main adversary to USA and it geopolitical interest
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
There is a big confusion some people trying to create that USA will sanction India there is no provision in CAASTA like that

USA only said that it will be difficult for them to share technology like fighters and drones with India due to Security reasons as Russians are main adversary to USA and it geopolitical interest
Since USA has not given any technology till now and even actively vetoed high end technology sales to India involving USA hardware like in case of Greenpine radar, Arrow BMD or P8I Hydrocarbon sensor, there is no reason to say that USA will give anything to India at all.
 

WARREN SS

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,428
Likes
20,436
Country flag
Since USA has not given any technology till now and even actively vetoed high end technology sales to India involving USA hardware like in case of Greenpine radar, Arrow BMD or P8I Hydrocarbon sensor, there is no reason to say that USA will give anything to India at all.
What has India given to USA that term as statergic in sense like Pakistan on Cold war still they are sellons Us top notch
 

Jameson Emoni

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,473
Likes
4,250
They are present in every country to some extent, I guess.
Goal seems to be global domination ??
Don't know about HQ but seems to have close links with the UK (origin??)
Though this seems to border conspiracy theory realm, I think there might be truth behind this; nations trying to break free from this group (and its banking control) are squatted like flies.
I am not the kind who falls for conspiracy theories. My views are based on careful observation of geopolitical events. It may sound like conspiracy theory to some because larger news outlets don't cover this; It is because they are mostly members of The Cartel.
 

Jameson Emoni

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,473
Likes
4,250
Do they happen to be of predominantly Jewish community? :megusta:
Let us not venture into anti-semitism. The Cartel has all sorts of people (Anglo-Saxons, Chinese, Brazilians, etc.) working for it. Heck it even has Indians (Aam Aadmi Party) working for it.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,174
I have noticed these things Google and YouTube seems to shoehorn videos with NWO agenda.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
What has India given to USA that term as statergic in sense like Pakistan on Cold war still they are sellons Us top notch
India will give nothing to USA if USA only cause trouble. Till now USA has begaved in a hostile manner, funded NGOs against Modi, RSS etc. So it is best to simply consider USA as enemy country than do nonsensical gimmicks.

India doesn't need USA. USA just prints dollars and calls that trade which is slso not needed.
 

WARREN SS

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,428
Likes
20,436
Country flag
India will give nothing to USA if USA only cause trouble. Till now USA has begaved in a hostile manner, funded NGOs against Modi, RSS etc. So it is best to simply consider USA as enemy country than do nonsensical gimmicks.

India doesn't need USA. USA just prints dollars and calls that trade which is slso not needed.
India needs USA in geopolitics as alternative to china

Russian are to pussy to counterweights Chinese hegemonic designs against Indian interest

USA is sole superpower in the world and we have 100 billion trade with them.and 13% of our export goes to them
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
India needs USA in geopolitics as alternative to china

Russian are to pussy to counterweights Chinese hegemonic designs against Indian interest

USA is sole superpower in the world and we have 100 billion trade with them.and 13% of our export goes to them
India doesn't need any counterweight to china. USA has caused more damage to china than china even dreamt if causing India. It may be other way around- India needs China as counterweight to USA.

About trade, USA just prints dollars and hands it over. That is not really meaningful. We don't want to disrupt the global order and the petrodollar and hence don't challenge.
 

WARREN SS

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,428
Likes
20,436
Country flag
India doesn't need any counterweight to china. USA has caused more damage to china than china even dreamt if causing India. It may be other way around- India needs China as counterweight to USA.

About trade, USA just prints dollars and hands it over. That is not really meaningful. We don't want to disrupt the global order and the petrodollar and hence don't challenge.
Lol I don't know what your problem is but USA has more long term allies

Than both Russia and China it shows you much geocapital they have

Even today when a nut job is sitting over oval office.US UK and France not even hesitate one second to launch coalition offensive against Syria
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
There is a big confusion some people trying to create that USA will sanction India there is no provision in CAASTA like that

USA only said that it will be difficult for them to share technology like fighters and drones with India due to Security reasons as Russians are main adversary to USA and it geopolitical interest
This is what CAATSA says

Under Section 231 of CAATSA, any third-country firm or individual that engages in a "significant transaction" with Russia's defense or intelligence sectors will face a penalty.

Basically, any Indian bank or firm that deals with Russia will be penalised by GOTUS. This "penalty" will come in multiple forms- sanctions on banking activities, sourcing components from US, US investment or join partnerships with these entities etc. Nowhere does it say that it will be restricted to transfer of technology.

Yes, countries can apply for a waver, but...

Companies and individuals can apply for an exemption from the sanctions. Getting one, however, would require U.S. authorities to certify not only that the exemption would not harm the United States' national security interests but also that Russia had made "significant efforts to reduce the number and intensity of cyber intrusions."

So an exemption will be granted only if US officials certify on Russian behaviour..in other words never.

Then there is waver..

a waiver under Section 231. The waiver, which has a maximum length of 180 days, requires U.S. officials to certify that the applicant is "substantially reducing the number of significant transactions" with targeted Russian interests.

So the company requesting a waver must commit to reducing dealings with Russians, else the sanctions will come down the line.

The stated aim of CAATSA is "not simply to penalize Russia for its perceived bad behavior but also to expand U.S. arms sales wherever possible."

 

Jameson Emoni

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,473
Likes
4,250
India needs USA in geopolitics as alternative to china

Russian are to pussy to counterweights Chinese hegemonic designs against Indian interest

USA is sole superpower in the world and we have 100 billion trade with them.and 13% of our export goes to them
Right now US is busy with Russia and China is busy with US. This gives India a narrow window of opportunity to get its military in order.
 

Haldiram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
5,708
Likes
28,648
Country flag
Turks are degenerate Muslims tho they are a admixture of arab, Turkic tribes and Kurds, most of their European looks comes from Slavic sex slaves.
The Byzantine were most likely Phonecians, Syrian Christaisn or Greek tribes.
The Turks are actually "Chinese". They migrated out of there many years ago and founded the Ottoman empire in Europe and they are lodged there like a parasite (basically like all other Muslims lodged elsewhere).



They are still demanding an independent nation of "East Turkey-stan" in China (what we colloquially know as Uyghurs).

 

prohumanity

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
1,290
Likes
1,362
Country flag
The very assumption that India needs USA to counter China is absolutely wrong. Some people like to propagate this falsehood that somehow India and China has no other choice but to be enemies.
Whose interest this type of assumption fulfills...of course the powers who want India and China to fight so they can sell weapons to both and make billions of dollars.

I would like the people to not buy this vested interest narrative about India and China.

in fact, India and China can certainly be at peace and coexist on principle of mutual respect. But the old and new colonial mindset does not want this as they want to keep propagating their hegemony and bullying.

Both India and China should keep increasing their military power so the very thought of going to War becomes unthinkable.. That will discourage those hegemonistic powers and they will stop trying to pit India against China.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
31,927
Likes
148,109
Country flag
The tragedy is they are the inheritors of the Byzantine Empire. The same empire that once had stars like Flavius Belisarius. I feel they are the greatest proof of the degeneracy brought about by Islam.
I remember reading somewhere that the current Turks are not descendants for Byzantine empire.

History buffs, please confirm....
 

nongaddarliberal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
4,002
Likes
22,794
Country flag
I remember reading somewhere that the current Turks are not descendants for Byzantine empire.

History buffs, please confirm....
Turks themselves say they are not the descendants of the Byzantines, as according to them they are descended from the Seljuk Turks who invaded anatolia. But in actuality most of them are descendants of the Byzantines, with some Turkic Central Asian (Mongoloid) blood mixed in. Same situation as pakis claiming to be Arab or Turkic. But the cultural transformation was much more pronounced than the slight genetic transformation. They are linguistically closer to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and other Turkic countries on the Altai mountains rather than the former Byzantines.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top