U.S. can’t interfere in our strategic decisions

[The Ultranationalist]

I dont think our air force(Russian jets) did anything spectacular against paki airforce(western jets ) in past conflicts. In both 65&71 war pakis had higher air to air kill ratio than IAF.

Now i am sure that you are a total idiot, the thing is porkies sucked ass in both the wars and suffered huge losses. Pakis have higer kill ratio only in their madarssa curriculum.

 

[The Ultranationalist]

Even in 71 war paki airforce did decently.
https://theprint.in/opinion/iaf-win...x-indian-naval-chief-debate-with-facts/36740/

The reason is simple pakis had access to more modern western jets and training. IAF also did a good job with Russian jets

In 71 war the momin (coward) porkies took refuge in an Iranian airbase along with their american jets ans refused to offer any fight as in those days Iran was ruled by Shah pahlavi who was a friend of porkis. Now prove me wrong, porkis busted the myth of american weapons superiority with their cowardice:biggrin2:

 

[undeadmyrmidon]

This explains everything...................................................................................

 

[spikey360]

Flankers r r just another white elephant from russia. Russians bribed mulayam sing and forced india to buy flankers.

Your brain is as slow and as useless as your mobile, which also happens to be your username. Don't bother with big things like jets and foreign policy. Rather focus on learning (everything) first. You know too little and speak too much.

 

[spikey360]

You can say whatever you want, but fact remains western jets r always step ahead of their Russian counterpart jets.

Yeah, you must mean a step ahead in the escalator which go downwards.

 

[spikey360]

Lol f16 is one of the best fighter jets ever produced.
F16 air to air kill ratio is like 75:1 :biggrin2:
Non of the Russian jets hav anything close to this.

Where did this dogfight take place? In your dreams?

 

[Samsung J7]

Where did this dogfight take place? In your dreams?

Ofcourse you did not read any of the above posts property

Read this properly
http://www.migflug.com/jetflights/the-combat-statistics-for-all-the-aircraft-currently-in-use.html

 

[spikey360]

Ofcourse you did not read any of the above posts property

Read this properly
http://www.migflug.com/jetflights/the-combat-statistics-for-all-the-aircraft-currently-in-use.html

It seems you yourself have been reading from your sources with a star spangled spectacles.
Quoting the above source

6) Su-27 is the only Russian fighter to have a positive kill ratio in combat, but as we all know this is likely due to “monkey model” export fighters, as well as the poor training standards of Arab air forces.

7) The unbeatens (aircraft that have engaged in significant air combat but never been shot down in air to air combat): F-15 Eagle, Sea Harrier, Su-27.

So? SU-27 figures in your stats, as good and as bad as the F15. So what's all your plaints about? Read your own sources at least, before posting such propaganda.

 

[Samsung J7]

It seems you yourself have been reading from your sources with a star spangled spectacles.
Quoting the above source

So? SU-27 figures in your stats, as good and as bad as the F15. So what's all your plaints about? Read your own sources at least, before posting such propaganda.

Lol su27 totally hav 5 or 6 kills and all of them is against Russian junk jets

 

[Kshithij]

Lol su27 totally hav 5 or 6 kills and all of them is against Russian junk jets

Tell me when was a Su30 jet ever shot down? If not, why are you blabbering?

 

[spikey360]

Lol su27 totally hav 5 or 6 kills and all of them is against Russian junk jets

The F16s and F15s which you jack off on, have scored kills on the same junk jets.

You should be thankful that SU27s never squared off against Falcons and Hornets, or they would have been swatted off like flies from the wall.

 

[Mikesingh]

Look folks India did kick ass in all wars after intial losses, PAF did well in 65. It is very silly to underestimate those unwashes Abduls, they being the instigators of violence have in the past used the element of surprise and the momentum that comes from being the aggressor to their advantage usually during the first 24-48 hrs, this resulted in early victories for them but when IAF catches on and begins to hit it back hard, they cannot continue to sustain the conflict. Paki are only good for short term prowess, they don't have the ability to take losses and sustain any fight beyond 72 hrs because by then tables have usually turned completely.

Often it's the ability to absorb punches that counts more than the strength of one's punch, while Pak can probably hit hard for the first 24-48 hrs even today, they'd eventually be picked off piece by piece by a far more resilient military.

Spot on! They peter out after a 100m dash!! Their endurance is near zero. Example: Then East Pakistan where they threw in the towel after just a few days of hammering.

 

[Suryavanshi]

................................................

 

[Mikesingh]

................................................

As the saying goes, it's the man behind the machine that counts. Turks don't have the aptitude for flying fighter planes! They're only good for fighting with swords on horseback like in the days of yore!

 

[Armand2REP]

As the saying goes, it's the man behind the machine that counts. Turks don't have the aptitude for flying fighter planes! They're only good for fighting with swords on horseback like in the days of yore!

Turks are so scared of dying they had to hire an Army of terrorists to do their work in Syria. They were so short of pilots after Erdogan's purge they had to hire Porkis to do the flying. They are basically an Arab military without the oil to pay for it and now in financial crisis.

 

[binayak95]

Turks are so scared of dying they had to hire an Army of terrorists to do their work in Syria. They were so short of pilots after Erdogan's purge they had to hire Porkis to do the flying. They are basically an Arab military without the oil to pay for it and now in financial crisis.

The tragedy is they are the inheritors of the Byzantine Empire. The same empire that once had stars like Flavius Belisarius. I feel they are the greatest proof of the degeneracy brought about by Islam.

 

[Suryavanshi]

The tragedy is they are the inheritors of the Byzantine Empire. The same empire that once had stars like Flavius Belisarius. I feel they are the greatest proof of the degeneracy brought about by Islam.

Turks are degenerate Muslims tho they are a admixture of arab, Turkic tribes and Kurds, most of their European looks comes from Slavic sex slaves.
The Byzantine were most likely Phonecians, Syrian Christaisn or Greek tribes.

 

[binayak95]

Turks are degenerate Muslims tho they are a admixture of arab, Turkic tribes and Kurds, most of their European looks comes from Slavic sex slaves.
The Byzantine were most likely Phonecians, Syrian Christaisn or Greek tribes.

Byzantines were all of the above alongwith Romans. That was an EMPIRE!

 

[Kshithij]

Turks are degenerate Muslims tho they are a admixture of arab, Turkic tribes and Kurds, most of their European looks comes from Slavic sex slaves.
The Byzantine were most likely Phonecians, Syrian Christaisn or Greek tribes.

Turks moved west due to genghis kahn chasing them westward. Turks of today's turkey belong to north central asia, not to Byzantine/Turkey.

 

[Armand2REP]

Turks are degenerate Muslims tho they are a admixture of arab, Turkic tribes and Kurds, most of their European looks comes from Slavic sex slaves.
The Byzantine were most likely Phonecians, Syrian Christaisn or Greek tribes.

You are correct about isthmus Turks, they are bread from Slavs. The Turks of Central Anatolia get their European looks from intermarriage with Gauls that conquered it in ancient times.