- Joined
- Apr 27, 2017
- Messages
- 562
- Likes
- 970
Dude, stop thinking like a commietard/bhakthard. The same result could have been achieved just by temporarily halting the printing of new notes as the economy expanded. In simple terms, the Govt could have ordered the RBI to just print notes for rplaement of bad notes and that itself would have reduced the circulating the notes as % economy to level the govt supposedly targetted. So what was the need for the massive demonetisation exercise, which has effectively lowered our GDP growth by 2% for past year and 1.5% for the present year and 1% for all future years to come before the recovery?I might be wrong, but if we consider the fact that our GDP has grown in the meantime. Had there been no DeMo, the amount of money in circulation would have risen above the amount of money in circulation pre-DeMo. So even if we have reached 99% of DeMo levels today, we are much below the amount we would have had in circulation had there been no DeMo.
Could it be that the current levels of circulation is roughly 70% of what would have been in circulation had there been no DeMo?
BTW, this theory that circulating cash is somehow bad for the economy is itself bogus. Otherwise, USA wouldnt be the biggest superpower in the world, considering how much of its currency circulates worldwide with no problem(even though this is not a apples to apples comparison)