The potential of Indian Agriculture

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
Mineral and power resources 003
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
Mineral & Energy Resources (X+) 001
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
Mineral & Energy Resources (X+) 002
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
Output and Growth



"¢ As per 2nd advance estimates for 2011-12, total foodgrains production is estimated at a record level of 250.42 million tonnes, which is 5.64 million tonnes higher than that of the last year production.

"¢ Percentage share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) originating from agriculture has fallen from about 30 percent in 1990-91 to 14.5 percent in 2010-11.

"¢ Out of the total share of 14.5 per cent that agriculture and allied sectors had in GDP in 2010-11, agriculture alone accounted for 12.3 per cent, followed by forestry and logging at 1.4 per cent and fishing at 0.7 per cent @@

"¢ As a result of openness policy of the government, the ratio of agricultural exports and imports as a percent of agricultural GDP increased from 4.9 percent in 1990-91 to 12.7 percent in 2010-11.

"¢ Agricultural production and growth in agriculture and allied sectors reached 7.0 per cent in 2010-11, the highest growth rate achieved during the last six years @@

"¢ Agricultural GDP witnessed a growth rate of 4.8 per cent during the Eighth plan period (1992–97), which fell to 2.5 percent during the Ninth plan period (1997–2002) and further to 2.4 percent during the Tenth plan period (2002–07). Growth rate during the first four years of Eleventh Plan (2007-12) was 3.5 percent.

"¢ During the 11th Five Year plan, agriculture growth is estimated at 3.28 per cent against a target of 4 per cent.

"¢ During 2000-01 to 2008-09, the growth performance of agriculture in Rajasthan (8.2%), Gujarat (7.7%) and Bihar (7.1%) was much higher than that of Uttar Pradesh (2.3%) and West Bengal (2.4%).

"¢ The key indicator in drivers of agri-growth is GCF in agriculture as a percentage to agri-GDP. As a proportion of the value added by agriculture to GDP, Gross Capital Formation (GCF) in agriculture and allied sectors rose to 20.1 per cent in 2010-11 from 13.5 per cent in 2004-05 at 2004-05 prices @@

"¢ In the early 1980s, the share of the public sector and private sector (including household sector) in gross capital formation (GCF) in agriculture was roughly equal, but by the early 2000s, the share of the private sector was four times larger than the share of the public sector at 2004-05 prices.

"¢ During 2010-11, foodgrains production was 244.78 million tonnes, comprising 121.14 million tonnes during Kharif season and 123.64 million tonnes during the Rabi season.

"¢ Of the total foodgrains production, production of cereals was 226.54 million tonnes and pulses 18.24 million tonnes during 2010-11.

"¢ As per the 2nd Advance Estimates, the area coverage under foodgrains during 2011-12 stood at 1254.92 lakh ha compared to 1267.65 lakh ha in 2010-11.

"¢ Despite inconsistent climatic factors in some parts of the country, there has been a record production, surpassing the targeted production of 245 million tonnes of foodgrains by more than 5 million tonnes during 2011-12.

"¢ As per 2nd advance estimates for 2011-12, production of rice is expected at 102.75 million tonnes, Wheat 88.31 million tonnes, coarse cereals 42.08 million tonnes and pulses 17.28 million tonnes.

"¢ The productivity of rice has increased from 1984 kg per hectare in 2004-05 to 2314 kg per hectare in 2011-12. The productivity of wheat which was 2602 kg/hectare in 2004-05 has increased to 3057 kg/hectare in 2011-12. The productivity of coarse cereals has increased significantly from 1153 kg per hectare in 2004-05 to 1572 kg per hectare in 2011-12

"¢ Oilseeds production during 2011-12 is estimated at 30.53 million tonnes, sugarcane production is estimated at 347.87 million tonnes and cotton production is estimated at 34.09 million bales (of 170 kg. each).

"¢ The productivity of pulses has significantly increased from 577 kg per hectare in 2004-05 to 679 kg per hectare in 2011-12.

"¢ By 2011-12, almost 90 percent of cotton area is covered under Bt cotton, production has more than doubled (compared to 2002-03), yields have gone up by almost 70 percent, and export potential for more than Rs 10,000 crore worth of raw cotton per year has been created.

"¢ All the major coarse cereals display a negative growth in area during the two periods-1990-91 to 1999-2000 and 2000-01 to 2010-11, except for maize, which recorded an annual growth rate of 2.68 per cent in the period 2000-01 to 2010-11. The production of maize has also increased by 7.12 percent in the latter period.

"¢ During 2010-11, maize was grown on an area of 8.55 million hectares with an all time record production of 21.73 million tonnes. About 88 % of cultivated maize is Kharif rainfed.

"¢ During 2011-12, the area under fruit crops is at 6.58 million ha with a production of 77.52 million tonnes, which contributes to a 32% share in total production.

"¢ Vegetables occupies 8.49 million ha with a total production of 149.61 million tonnes having a productivity of 17.42 tonnes per ha.

"¢ Milk production is estimated to be around 121.8 million tonnes during 2010-11 as compared to 53.9 million tonnes in 1990-91. Per capita availability of milk at national level has increased from 176 grams per day in 1990-91 to 281 grams per day in 2010-11.

"¢ Total meat production from cattle, buffalo, sheep, goat, pig and poultry at the all India level increased from 1.5 million tonnes in 2000-01 to an estimated 4.83 million tonnes in 2010-11.

"¢ The total egg production for the year 2010-11 was an estimated around 61.45 billion as compared to 21.1 billion during 1990-91. As per FAOSTAT latest production data for the year 2010, India ranks 3rd in egg production in the world.

"¢ The total fish production during 2010-11 is estimated at 8.29 million tonnes with a contribution of 5.07 million tonnes from the inland sector and 3.22 million tonnes from the marine sector.



Source: State of Indian Agriculture 2011-12, http://agricoop.nic.in/SIA111213312.pdf

@@ Economic Survey 2011-12, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2011-12/echap-08.pdf



Interesting facts about Indian agriculture #


"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using HYV or hybrid (improved) seeds is 59%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using fertilizers is 81%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using manure is 74%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using pesticides is 47%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using weedicides is 22%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using irrigation is 66%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using tractors and power tillers is 54%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated using harvestors and harvestor combines is 6%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated with improved seeds in the case of paddy (kharif) is 51%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated with improved seeds in the case of paddy (rabi) is 66%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated with improved seeds in the case of wheat is 63%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated with improved seeds in the case of other cereals is 64%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops cultivated with improved seeds in the case of pulses is 47%
"¢ Percentage of area under field crops located in villages with Govt. irrigation canals is 25%
"¢ Percentage of mechanically-tilled area using hired tractor/ power-tiller is 72%
"¢ Percentage of rural households engaged in field-crop cultivation is 61%
"¢ Percentage of field-crop cultivator (FCC)* households owning 1 hectare or less of land is 62%
"¢ Percentage of irrigated area hiring irrigation services from other households in canal areas is 40%
"¢ Percentage of irrigated area hiring irrigation services from other households in non-canal areas is 49%

* The category 'cultivator households' includes also those households who were reported to have some area under orchards or plantations but none devoted to cultivation of seasonal crops. As distinct from a cultivator household, a field-crop cultivator (FCC) household is defined as one which reported cultivation of at least one field crop during the agricultural year.

# Cultivation Practices in India, Report No. 451(54/31/3), NSS 54th Round, January 1998 – June 1998:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

nrupatunga

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
2,310
Likes
960
The Grim Reaper: Declining Profitability of Agriculture and the Agrarian Crisis in India
Farmer suicides in India, currently estimated at over 200,000 between 1997 and 2011.

The dramatic increase in food prices in recent times might also lead one to believe that farming is a profitable business. However, in India, while large farmers are net sellers of food grains, small farmers who constitute a major percentage of the farming population are net buyers. This means that as food prices increase, large farmers make bigger profits while smaller farmers are forced to shell out more money for their food.

Numerous reasons have been cited for this decline, one of the most interesting being the after-effects of the Green Revolution in India. In the 1960s, High Yielding Varieties (HYV) of crops, most importantly rice and wheat, were developed by international agricultural research centres and introduced in Latin America and Asia. In India, these crops were rapidly adopted and led to increased productivity. Although these crops required higher input of fertilizers and irrigation, they had much higher output than traditional varieties. Furthermore, the Indian Government promoted these crops by subsidizing inputs such as fertilizers and electricity for irrigation. However, the investment in irrigation has been gradually declining with the result that only 35% of the total agricultural area is currently irrigated. Moreover, the input subsidies have placed a heavy fiscal burden on the government.

For example, the state of Punjab in India was at the forefront of the Green Revolution and underwent substantial modernization of the agricultural sector. There was consolidation in the land holdings and the subsidization of electricity for irrigation by the government. Per hectare consumption of fertilizers increased, and water intensive crops like cotton, rice and wheat were adopted. Singh has shown that the total operational cost of rice and wheat increased by around 50% between 2000-01 and 2005-06, while rice yields increased by only 12%, and wheat yields actually declined by 8%. (Singh, Karam. 2010. "Agrarian Crisis in Punjab: High Indebtedness, Low Returns and Farmer Suicides". Agrarian Crisis in India. Edited by Narasimha Reddy and Srijit Mishra. Oxford University Press. 261 – 280.) This means that while farmers spend more money on growing their crops, their total output, and therefore their profit, has continued to decline. Moreover, excessive dependence on these crops has made farmers extremely vulnerable to a number of factors ranging from volatility of commodity prices to increasing changes in weather patterns due to climate change. Had they maintained their crop diversity and not solely depended on these HYVs, they might have been better shielded from these factors.

Another factor that has an important impact on agriculture in India is the Agreement on Agriculture (AOA) under the World Trade organization (WTO). This was formed in order to enforce the policies of economic liberalization and promote free trade. Under this system, it was believed that developing countries would have the comparative advantage over developed countries. However, the opposite has often been the case, mainly because of its distorting effects on market access and relationships.

For example, the first tenet of the AOA required enabling market access. Developing countries could no longer have import bans and prevent other countries from importing commodities into their markets. Instead, they had to replace them with tariffs. However, Gulati found that while India's peak tariff rate in the dairy sector was zero percent in 1998, those of the EU, South Korea, Canada and Japan were 99%, 211%, 213% and 336% respectively, thus preventing or at the least making it extremely difficult to gain access to their markets. (Gulati, Ashok. 2001. "Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda in the WTO 2000 Negotiations: Interests and Options for India." Prepared for The World Bank's Integrated Program of Research and Capacity Building to Enhance Participation of Developing Countries in the WTO 2000 Negotiations)

The combined result of the AOA is that markets in developing countries are flooded with cheaper commodities from developed countries. Although AOA essentially allows developing countries to put in place their own mechanisms to reduce the price of their commodities, they simply cannot afford to do so.

In today's world, a farmer in rural India is inevitably linked to a banker on Wall Street. Professor Jayati Ghosh, an eminent economist from India, has shown how speculation and futures trading in commodities by large banks adversely affected the price of crops and directly contributed to the global food crisis. In an interestingly titled paper "The Unnatural Coupling: Food and Global Finance", she argues that deregulation of commodities trading in the United States and elsewhere resulted in extreme volatility of food markets.

The problem with agriculture in India, as in many developing counties today, does not lie with demand-supply imbalances, a decline in net food production, or excessive demand caused by population growth. The problem does not even lie completely with the actual farming itself, but rather the political economy of the society in which it takes place.

Agriculture in India intersects with almost every development agenda—be it poverty elimination, rural development, environmental protection or human development—because of the huge number of people it employs. It is therefore very important that agricultural development successfully keep pace with the progress other sectors have made. Teaching farmers how to better invest their money and grow crops using advanced scientific techniques is no doubt important, but there are a number of extremely complex factors at play that determine the profitability of agriculture. If India were to achieve the status it wishes on the world stage, it would do well to understand this and protect the sector that is a big source of livelihood for a huge percentage of its population.
 

Raj30

Senior Member
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,325
Likes
1,603
The Vegetable Revolution

K P Prabhakaran Nair

Indian farmers have often been perceived as lacking initiative, but the latest developments on the farm front belie that stereotype. Not only have they shown initiative, but they have started a quiet revolution on their own steam without prompting from anyone. Least of all from the Government of India was the case with the chemically-driven agriculture euphemistically called the "green revolution". This had the blessing of the Americans, but was peddled by an Indian "scientist" who through the back door siphoned off our invaluable rice germplasms and gifted them to the aliens as a token of "gratitude", for which he received a dubious World Food Award in return.

In the process, our soils were degraded, our ground water loaded with chemicals and rendered non-potable, our aquifers dried out, our biodiversity vanished, lethal diseases like cancer spread in places like Gurudaspur (Punjab) due to unbridled use of chemical pesticides. In a nutshell, the Indian environment was totally polluted, while the Americans made billions of dollars selling their chemical fertilisers and pesticides to India, using Indian soils as a dumping ground.

Most tragically of all, India's one and only brilliant agricultural scientist and plant breeder par excellence, late Dr RH Richharia, Director of the prestigious Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, who would not bow to American pressure and part with our very unique rice germplasms for lure of money (in contrast to the other "scientist"), was not only hounded out of office, but made to lose the top job of Director General of the reconstituted Indian Council of Agricultural Research in New Delhi. This position was rightfully his, but was manipulated to be taken away from him by the hidden agenda of the "scientist" referred to above.

Dr Richharia died a broken man, unable to withstand the treachery directed against him by a coterie backed by the Americans. Anyway, that is another story which contemporary Indians have chosen to forget, sadly, for a once great country. We have many among us now, in public and private life, who are ready to sell this country to the aliens for personal gains, surprisingly even in the "supposedly honest" media and newspapers.

To return to our theme, the results on the vegetable front are simply startling and the prospects look extremely promising. The phenomenon can be summed up in just two words – a "Vegetable Revolution". Small farmers, reeling from recurring droughts and declining productivity of staple crops like rice and wheat, are turning enthusiastically to these short-duration crops as the rising demand for vegetables has opened up a money-making opportunity. In a couple of years, India has become the second largest producer of vegetables in the world, next only to China.

A month ago, this author who travels a lot within India and helps poor farmers, was on a tour of the districts of northern Kerala. Here one found rice farmers who had given up rice and were cultivating beans, cucurbits and banana. When asked about the switch, they simply said, "With an unreliable monsoon and a step-motherly attitude of the government, who seem to be helping the land mafia through the back door, we found vegetable cultivation a lot more profitable. The short duration cycles, and low inputs, make it all the more rewarding".

Take this example from Jharkhand. Ram Oraon, 60, a marginal farmer from Malhan Bhuiyadih village near Ranchi, blamed his grandfather for his poor health and a life spent mostly battling poverty; he watched two brothers die young from poor health. Over the years, Oraon realised the reason for his family's sufferings, "Like other farmers in my village, my grandfather would grow rice and potato and we would eat mostly that. He never saw profit in vegetables, nor was he aware of their health benefits". Though late in life, Oraon made a course correction. About a decade ago, he switched to vegetable farming. Showing off a basketful of freshly harvested brinjals from his farm and a bundle of notes, Oraon said "Now, we are healthy and a bit wealthy". This holds true for most families in his tribal village now. Lured by the booming vegetable market, the farmers of Malhan Bhuiyadih and several neighbouring villages in Ranchi have dumped paddy and other staple crops for growing the greens.

Flood-prone Bihar, West Bengal, Jharkhand, and Odisha, receive the vegetables regularly from the district which has earned distinction as the "Vegetable Basket of Jharkhand". By growing vegetables, the tribal population is not only earning a handsome profit, lately they have also started regularly including nutritious greens in their diet, which is a very healthy trend.

About a decade ago, farmers in Malhan Bhuiyadih grew vegetables and paddy in the ratio of 40:60. But now, paddy occupies only 25 per cent of the land. The Economic Survey of Jharkhand shows that some 80,000 hectares have been brought under vegetable cultivation during the last decade.

In 2000, vegetables were grown on 150,000 hectares, which has led to a drastic change in the agricultural employment pattern. While in 1983, vegetable farming employed a negligible number of farmers, it now employs 2.3 per cent of the state's farmers. Traders from as far as Delhi throng the rural weekly vegetable markets to procure vegetables, cart them to Delhi and sell at huge profit. To harness the potential of the new economy, traders in the state are demanding a special train to ferry vegetables to far off cities like Bengaluru and Mumbai. This was unthinkable a decade ago.

It is heartening to note that Jharkhand is not alone in this trend. Farmers across the country, particularly in drought-prone regions, are waking up to the potential of this new "Vegetable Revolution". Vegetable production has been traditionally considered a risky venture because of the shorter shelf life. But all this is changing fast.

What prompted the switch over? The popular perception is that farmers shifted to vegetables only in the past 4-5 years to exploit the rise in vegetable prices. But, this is not true. The shift has been gradual for a decade. States such as Jharkhand, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh and Odisha – which frequently suffer droughts and floods – were the first to make the switch.

People who closely follow the farmer's plight cannot fail to note that the shift is a coping mechanism in the face of frequent failure of the monsoon or sudden floods, and the prevailing agrarian crisis. A nagging question is, will this switch affect food security of the country? The answer is that it will not. The bread basket will continue to remain Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh in the north and Andhra Pradesh in the south. The point to note is that the soils of these states are getting increasingly degraded because of the monoculture of rice-wheat rotation.

In my considered view, the shift towards increased cereal production will now take place in the eastern belt, particularly Bihar. A Bihar farmer is on record as having produced a rice crop that yielded more than 23 tonnes a hectare – indeed a world record!

Since 2000, drought has been regular in several districts of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. These are the districts where most farmers have resorted to vegetable production. In 2010, after six consecutive years of drought in the Bundelkhand region, the Madhya Pradesh government called a special session of the Legislative Assembly to discuss ways to make farming profitable. One key strategy suggested was to increase the area under vegetables by 500, 000 ha. In 2012-13, the state received an award from New Delhi for the highest growth in vegetable production in the country.

Growing vegetables is currently the most profitable proposition available, especially for small and marginal farmers. Even in a tiny state like Kerala where, faced with the non-profitability of paddy, farmers are switching almost wholesale to banana, cucurbits, melons and beans, in Palakkad district, the "rice bowl" of Kerala.

What is also pushing farmers to switch to vegetables is shrinking farm size. The average land holding in the country in 2010 was 1.22 ha. It was almost double (2.28 ha) in 1970. Staples like wheat and paddy are less productive, the yield levels having steeply plateaued or declined. In such a situation, the farmer has no choice except to pump in more costly inputs like fertiliser and pesticide to prop up the yields. This has become un-remunerative.

Add to this the scarcity of labour – typically characterised in a state like Kerala. The Gulf boom led to a large exodus of unskilled labourers who once toiled in the fields. This is most markedly seen in Palakkad district, where rice farmers are either abandoning their fields or putting them to vegetables.

This situation opens up the chances of food insecurity, but the state has in any case depended on imported rice from other states, mainly Andhra Pradesh, for a long time. However, under the technical guidance of the author, a vigorous "Paddy Campaign" is in place to restore the state's pre-eminent position in paddy cultivation, but progress is at a snail's pace.

In 2007, the Indian Council of Agricultural Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) did a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of growing vegetables among other horticulture products. It found the shift to horticulture was faster in recent years due to declining benefits from cereals. For each unit of investment in vegetables, the return was almost double; returns were half for cereals. "This implies that it is profitable to cultivate fruits and vegetables rather than cereals" the ICRIER report concludes.

Of course, the time was right and the opportunity too good to miss. Food preferences were changing in this period. People now demand vegetables and other high-value commodities like fruits and livestock products rather than cereals due to rising incomes and changing lifestyles.

It is not that cereals are totally dispensed with, but the proportion of cereals to fruits/ vegetables, unlike in the past, is shifting towards the latter in terms of unit consumption – a trend observed in a growing economy like China as well. This is true for both urban and rural areas. Fruits and vegetables are no longer considered a "luxury" even among the poor. The trend is clearly reflective of a growing Indian economy.

Periodic surveys by the National Sample Survey Office show a clear shift from food grains towards fruits and vegetables, livestock products and fisheries. These are the products responsible for the high and persistent food inflation in the past 5-7 years. Yet their share among all food items consumed remains high: 47.4 per cent in 2007-08, up from 41.3 per cent in 1993-94 and 37.3 per cent in 1983-84.

Between 2005 and 2010, vegetable consumption alone went up by 30 per cent in rural areas. Fruits and vegetables now contribute more than 30 per cent to the overall agricultural output in states such as Himachal Pradesh, Odisha, West Bengal, Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar and the north eastern states, according to the National Horticultural Board.

That farmers prefer vegetables over other crops is also clear from the employment data. The number of people employed in staple crops production has declined and in horticulture, which includes vegetables, it is picking up. The share of horticulture in crop sector employment was 1.9 per cent until 1993-94. It reached 3.5 per cent in 2009-10, though it was a severe drought year. This year, the share is expected to rise to 5 per cent. It is the small and marginal farmers who contribute to this increase. India is increasingly becoming a country of marginal farmers, contributed by the "land grab" mentality of the governments for industrial development.

Vegetable farming is a refuge for small and marginal cultivators battered by erratic monsoons and uncertain returns from staple crops, in particular, paddy. They contribute 70 per cent of the total vegetables produced in the country, while they own just 44 per cent of the land, according to a report of the Planning Commission's Working Group on Horticulture. The shift to vegetables is accelerated because the cost benefit ratio is more, and more frequent, for them than for fruits.

Ecology (environmental considerations) and economics support this transition. On average, a farmer needs one cubic metre of water to produce 330 grams of grains. The same quantity of water is sufficient to grow 18 kg of vegetables. Besides, paddy takes a minimum of 100 days to mature, while vegetables are ready for harvest, depending on what one grows, between 45-60 days. Cereal farming like paddy is un-remunerative on small patches of land, but for vegetables any size will do.

Then there is the price advantage. Unlike the prices of cereal crops, determined by market forces, farmers can sell vegetables at prices they choose. A farmer can sell his or her crop in the local market every week, while for paddy, he has to wait close to four months.

For farmers in Bahuti village of Mirzapur district in Uttar Pradesh, water availability and quality farm inputs posed a big problem. With a view to helping and encouraging farmers to take up vegetable production, the Indian Institute of Vegetable Research in Varanasi introduced a project named "Ensuring livelihood security through watershed based farming system module".

The farmers were encouraged to take up pea cultivation, and two varieties, "Kashi Nandini", which flowers in about 32 days, and "Kashi Uday", which flowers in about 35 days, were taken up. A farmer (Sushil Kumar) earned about Rs1 lakh in less than five months, a sum he would never have earned had he continued with his paddy crop.

There are five basic reasons why vegetables are becoming popular. The first is that they are short-duration crops. This offers the farmer frequent income. In comparison, paddy or millets are long-duration ones for about 6 months or more and the farmer has to wait that long for returns.

Vegetables also offer a ready market. In a vegetable-deficient state, the farmer has a ready market at his doorstep. Horticulture development programmes can further enhance this appeal.

The returns are almost instant; growing vegetables means being integrated with the market. Monetarily, the farmers are better off; they can sell vegetables and with the money buy food grains, and still be left with some cash in hand.

Shrinking land holdings means it makes better sense. Cereals are less viable on small patches of land, but the same patch of land can be used several times to grow vegetables without compromising on cultivation of cereals for sustenance.

Finally, water management is much easier. While cereal crops are monsoon-dependent, vegetables can be cultivated round the year with assured irrigation. The government through the horticulture mission is promoting dug wells. Traditional water storage structures can also ensure irrigation to small vegetable farms.

The Planning Commission provides some interesting data suggesting that the Vegetable Revolution may well be driving India's agriculture. Its estimates are: While production of rice saw negative growth in the 2000s, vegetable production has been consistent. It grew 0.49 per cent in 2007-08, 1.69 per cent in 2008-09 and 6.4 per cent in 2010-11. In 2011-12 it came down, yet it was the highest and three times more than that of fruits.

Though land under vegetable has not grown much – 115,140 ha. has been brought under vegetables across the country during the past 5 years; production has soared by 65 per cent between 2001 and 2011. The average yield per hectare has increased from 12.2 tonnes to 16.7 tonnes.

Vegetable production is growing fastest among all the different varieties of horticulture and this trend will decide the overall growth of agriculture in the country. A true Vegetable Revolution is in the making – a revolution that came by itself, through the combined efforts of countless Indian farmers without the government or agricultural messiahs shouting about it from the roof tops.
 

Simple_Guy

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
938
Likes
578
Gujarat first Rajasthan second in agri production

The estimates, released by the central statistical office, calculate value of output at the mandi point. The aggregate figures represent farm and associated activities like livestock, fisheries and forest produce. Gujarat grew at 19.5% Rajasthan 19%. Then Maharashtra with 15.4%, Karnataka (14.9%), Andhra Pradesh (10%) and Tamil Nadu at 7.9% complete the top ranks.

In terms of aggregate total output, Uttar Pradesh remains number 1, aided by large land mass and fertile areas. Yet, for the natural advantage of the Yamuna-Gangetic basins, UP's growth is a lethargic 3.5%. Signs of India's traditional wheat bowls having peaked are evident with Punjab growing at 2.7%.

If output of fisheries is evaluated, Andhra Pradesh tops the chart, followed by West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Kerala, Maharashtra and Odisha.

The value of output for livestock in 2010-11 puts Uttar Pradesh at number 1, followed by Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Punjab.
 

Imran520

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
21
Likes
1
Agriculture is most important sector of economy.

india-forums.tv
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Agriculture is most important sector of economy
I just heard a fact cited in a radio program that only 3% of US population is involved directly with agriculture. What percentage do you suppose it is in India or Pakistan?
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
I just heard a fact cited in a radio program that only 3% of US population is involved directly with agriculture. What percentage do you suppose it is in India or Pakistan?
Majority of the population.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Majority of the population.
I thought it would be, but the contrast to me is astounding.

Green Revolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 1961 India was on the brink of mass famine.[3] Borlaug was invited to India by the adviser to the Indian minister of agriculture C. Subramaniam. Despite bureaucratic hurdles imposed by India's grain monopolies, the Ford Foundation and Indian government collaborated import wheat seed from CIMMYT. Punjab was selected by the Indian government to be the first site to try the new crops because of its reliable water supply and a history of agricultural success. India began its own Green Revolution program of plant breeding, irrigation development, and financing of agrochemicals.[4]

India soon adopted IR8 – a semi-dwarf rice variety developed by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) that could produce more grains of rice per plant when grown with certain fertilizers and irrigation. In 1968, Indian agronomist S.K. De Datta published his findings that IR8 rice yielded about 5 tons per hectare with no fertilizer, and almost 10 tons per hectare under optimal conditions. This was 10 times the yield of traditional rice.[5] IR8 was a success throughout Asia, and dubbed the "Miracle Rice". IR8 was also developed into Semi-dwarf IR36.
Wheat yields in developing countries, 1950 to 2004, kg/HA baseline 500. The steep rise in crop yields in the U.S. began in the 1940s. The percentage of growth was fastest in the early rapid growth stage. In developing countries maize yields are still rapidly rising.[6]

In the 1960s, rice yields in India were about two tons per hectare; by the mid-1990s, they had risen to six tons per hectare. In the 1970s, rice cost about $550 a ton; in 2001, it cost under $200 a ton.[7] India became one of the world's most successful rice producers, and is now a major rice exporter, shipping nearly 4.5 million tons in 2006.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sob

cobra commando

Tharki regiment
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
11,115
Likes
14,530
Country flag
India set to record highest
ever foodgrain production


NEW DELHI: India is set to record highest ever foodgrain production. The government on Friday revised its estimate, saying the country would collectively produce 264.28 million tonnes (MT) of foodgrain as compared to 257.13 million tones last year. Releasing its third estimates of crop production, the agriculture ministry said the country was expected to set the records for both rice and wheat. "Rice production is expected at record 106.29MT and wheat production is expected to reach 95.85MT, again a record," said the ministry. The revised production took into account kharif crops of the year 2013 and rabi crops of the year 2013-14. Good monsoon last year had helped the country in achieving this feat. In the earlier estimates (2nd Advance Estimates) released in February, the total foodgrain production was pegged at 263.2 million tonne. "Record production has also been achieved in the case of tur (3.38 MT), gram (9.93 MT), maize (24.19 MT), all pulses put together (19.57 MT), cotton (36.50 million bales) and jute (10.82 million bales)," said the ministry.

India set to record highest ever foodgrain production - The Times of India
 

cobra commando

Tharki regiment
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
11,115
Likes
14,530
Country flag
A farmer-turned-agricultural scientist in Daulatpur village of Barabanki has been able to pull over 5,000 farmers out of poverty by teaching them his own hi-tech methods of farming. According to a report in

Bhaskar , 8th pass Ram Saran Verma started experimenting in 1990, and had Jagjivan Ram National Award to his credit by 2007. Narendra Modi himself applauded Saran's efforts in contribution to the economy and serving other farmers. Soon, farmers from across the country started approaching him to learn his techniques. He would visit their farms and guide them on which methods to use. 125 villages in his district became self-sustainable as farmers adopted Saran's hi-tech methods of farming. In no time, Saran became the hi- tech farming guru for locals and agri scientist-cum-consultant for farmers across the nation. Today, he is carrying out farming on a 70-acre land and has a turnover of crores. He has also been successful in devising a way of producing good quality tomatoes, which are better than those available in the main hub Nashik. The tomatoes he cultivates are being sold in Bihar, Bengal, Assam, Maharashtra and are also being exported to foreign countries.

Hailed by Modi himself, this 'crorepati' farmer pulled 5,000 others out of poverty
 

cobra commando

Tharki regiment
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
11,115
Likes
14,530
Country flag
MP registers record agri growth at 24.99% in 2013-14

Madhya Pradesh registered a record growth at 24.99 per cent in FY 2013-14 in the agriculture sector, including animal husbandry. The agriculture growth rate was 20.16 per cent in 2012-13 and 19.85 per cent in 2011-12 in the state, according to an official release issued on Sunday. "Madhya Pradesh has created history by posting the highest ever agricultural growth rate. As per the advance figures for 2013-14 released by Central Statistical Organisation (CSO), the state has clocked a 24.99 per cent agriculture growth rate including in animal husbandry sector," the release said. Because of continuous record growth in the agriculture sector, the state has been bestowed with the prestigious "Krishi Karman Award" by the government of India for the last two years in a row, it said. The wheat production was 73.27 lakh tonnes in 2004-05, which increased to 193 lakh tonnes in 2013-14. Similarly, soybean production has increased from 37.60 lakh tonnes to 50 lakh tonnes during the period. Rice production increased from 13.09 lakh tonnes in 2004-05 to 69.50 lakh tonnes now. The area under these crops was 104.80 lakh hectare which has risen to 140.15 lakh tonnes now, representing a 34 per cent increase, according to the release.

MP registers record agri growth at 24.99% in 2013-14 - IBNLive
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top