then what about this article about Team Anna!!!Maoists demands are right,their way of getting their demands is wrong
Is feudalism allowed under the constitution?Yes, the Maoists are Indians. Yes, the Maoists have been subjected to extreme poverty. Yes, the Maoists have not been given a share in what is rightfully theirs. Yes, the Maoists may have a thousand reasons to be angry.
No, they do not have the right to armed revolt under the constitution. No, they don't support the Indian constitution. No, they do not want peaceful solutions to their problems.
All of the above are established facts. Does anyone disagree?
One must remember, that when a war is fought, it is fought between two competitors, not between friends, not between compatriots. Therefore I urge you Sirs, please do not call the Maoists Indians and therefore disrespect those Jawans who made the supreme sacrifice in order to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution and the Indian people who form the Constitution,
Naxalism was largely defeated by the CPI and CPI(M) in the 70s. It only resurfaced recently with generous help from Mamata Banerjee. Naxalites were a fringe group for decades, and that happened because they lost mass support, thanks to Land Reforms by the LF Government.I thought the first enactment the govt of free India promulgted was Land Refroms Act that abolish Jamindari system and to a large extent brought in land reforms. If only land was the issue, why is there Naxalism in Bengal and such radical extremism in Kerala? West Bengal had tens of years Marxist Rule and land reforms are well trenched I suppose.
You people are identifying wrong reasons. Tribals problem is not solely connected to land.
Naxalism may be defeated in India long back, but not in Telangana or AP, it was always their in AP, but when it was getting killed in 2005, the all leaders just moved to Chathisgarh.. then spread to whole India, see most of the Moaists are from Andra... Kishenji, RK........Naxalism was largely defeated by the CPI and CPI(M) in the 70s. It only resurfaced recently with generous help from Mamata Banerjee. Naxalites were a fringe group for decades, and that happened because they lost mass support, thanks to Land Reforms by the LF Government.
Land, along with resources, is the primary cause for Naxalite violence, and is the correct reason, but not the only reason.
Thanks for the perspective from ground.i am sorry sir, i still live in one naxal effected areas of India... but feel sad forces, they are made scapegoats by politicians.. when they live in forests for days eats roots and snakes... in fear of life, they cant trust any villagers.. they dont know is naxal and who is common man.. some times go mad and even create rampages.. and ransack the villages because they are the main source for naxal ration.. but here churches and pastors are main source of medical and money for naxals.. i have studied alot on ground in villages.. but it looks like degrading our forces.. and praising naxals, so wouldnt like to say them....
I was talking about mass support among the people. It existed all throughout, even after Siddhartha Shankar Roy of Congress managed to kill hundreds of students and intellectuals, who were involved in the movement. Congress was outsted from power in 1977, LF took office, and started implementing land reforms. Only after that Naxalite support among the masses were eliminated. While Congress government, with central help, suppressed the Naxal uprisings, there continued to be Naxal attacks.Naxalism in West Bengal was defeated by Congress and not by CPM.
Telangana communists (at that time, there was no such thing as Andhra Pradesh) were instrumental is starting a war against the secessionist State of Hyderabad. They have always had strong roots in that region, or so I hear. You can tell us more about that.Naxalism may be defeated in India long back, but not in Telangana or AP, it was always their in AP, but when it was getting killed in 2005, the all leaders just moved to Chathisgarh.. then spread to whole India, see most of the Moaists are from Andra... Kishenji, RK........
first naxalism started in 40's, to first against Nizam.. but that was not called naxalism but revolution.. it finished after joining Indian Republic.. and next it started as naxalism with good goals... abolishment of Jamindhari system... and other social problems....... it started corrupting in 80's.... by 90's it became worst... in early 2000's it merged with MCC and became terrorist org.Telangana communists (at that time, there was no such thing as Andhra Pradesh) were instrumental is starting a war against the secessionist State of Hyderabad. They have always had strong roots in that region, or so I hear. You can tell us more about that.
you have to sir naxalism is not a law and order issueMaoists are Indian and so are the Indian Mujahideens.
Can't apply two different yardsticks, can we?
But you can cut naxalism by bringing in lot of development which will cut their recruitment.What about IM?Neither is IM.
They are wanting Islamic supremacy in India.
Naxals want Communist revolution supremacy in India.
Therefore your point extrapolates to, it's ok to revolt against the government with arms as long as you can find a fault with it.Is feudalism allowed under the constitution?
Yet, it exists in many parts of India.
Constitutional obedience is not only the responsibility of the common citizens, but also that of the government. Let all kinds of feudalism be abolished, and let the government, with all its power, implement it first, before we can expect the poor tribals to comply.
Development is not the sole answer.But you can cut naxalism by bringing in lot of development which will cut their recruitment.What about IM?
Ray Sir,Neither is IM.
They are wanting Islamic supremacy in India.
Naxals want Communist revolution supremacy in India.
Is it wrong to revolt against anything that is unconstitutional?Therefore your point extrapolates to, it's ok to revolt against the government with arms as long as you can find a fault with it.
Say i'm offended with all the corruption going around, is it ok for me to smuggle myself an AK47 and start shooting the law at random? I must say Sir, yours is a prejudiced view.
From that point of view even the Islamic radicals are doing the right thing as they have been deprived of rule by Sharia and a full fledged Islamic state.