The Agni-3 Vs Agni-5 Conundrum and some Questions

DingDong

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
3,085
Likes
7,791
Country flag
hahaha,
Why so obsessed with Pork? Even your user name has Pork reference.
(Goes straight to ignore list :D)
What happened? The word "Pork" reminded you of Fatimah or what?
Don't be so sensitive :crazy:

Reply to the post #67. Give your Madarassa trained brain something to work on.
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,196
Yes this is my page, or I must say our page as we are a consortium.
No I am not replying to your question as whatever I do outside of this page is none of your or anyone else's concerns.
But whatever you post on your page is directly related to this discussion as it gives us a good idea about your knowledge about defense related stuff and why we should not take your garbage seriously.
 

safriz

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
147
Likes
78
Country flag
What happened? The word "Pork" reminded you of Fatimah or what?
Don't be so sensitive :crazy:

Reply to the post #67. Give your Madarassa trained brain something to work on.
Nop reminded me of Shivaji.
(See if you can make fun of my religion,so can i)
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,678
Likes
22,549
Country flag
@safriz ............. Let me make few things clear for you.

India has not yet developed MIRV let alone deploy it. So comparing nose cones as of now is out of question. @sayareakd already posted one pic for multiple warhead of Prithvi, although its not MIRV, but it does prove the concept that MIRV could be fitted inside a typical conical nose cone. For the sake of your satisfaction, I am posting a pic of US Peacekeeper missile which did had nearly same diameter dimension of A5.
Peacekeeper_missile.jpg

Now we all know that it was able to carry 8 MIRVs.

As far as Brahmos is concerned, you should know the fact that it was originally an ASCM. Only after its induction India planned on to build up on its other launching and target possibility. Brahmos was not meant to be fired from Submarine or from a Fighter at the time of conception. India did used its technical knowhow and worked out its way to make it feasible to get fired from all the three armed platform. You might have known, if you have studied, that US had shelved the plan to construct B-1B and opted to launch Peace keeper from a transport aircraft and even did it. Now does this shows their ingenuity of air launching an ICBM or their shortsightedness of not building an Air launch platform for ICBM?

As far as repeated trial of missile is concerned, this is the norm for any country who is on development phase of any technology. Even the missiles which get deployed and are in production phase, undergoes user trial where Missiles are randomly selected from production batch. It only proves the fact that all the missiles getting churned out from production line are trustworthy. In same way if you have seen any gun production facility, it is a norm there to randomly check any of those for reliability.

Moreover we are not satisfied with what we have achieved and want to outdo our self. 2nd flight test of Nirbhay had been a success, but instead of declaring it a success what we did is more and more tests and found out that its not ready. Now imagine if we would have inducted it after the second successful test based on our ground and dry test, then what would have happened if we actually had to fire it? No amount of dry test or ground test in field of aeronautics could provide you a correct fig of operational clearance of the system.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,242
Likes
55,884
Country flag
I read your long comment and here are the replies o the points you raised.
But after reading your this post, I really don't think you have learned something.:dude:
Seriously, who told you that Pakistan conducts more cold tests and simulations than India?
Pakistan does more bench and cold tests of individual components and less actual missile tests.
Wrong, Pakistan doesn't even produce, half of components required.
India has far bigger number of simulation facilities and Supercomputers for cold tests.

But this all is useless till you match codes with actual flight.

Other countries following same suite aren't idiots.
saves costs and keeps secrecy.
Costs of installation of such capacities is high and can never bear enough reliability.
The proof of this line of action was given big time in 1998 wen India conducted Nuclear tests tining aht Pakistan won't be able to do anything and surrender. They had no idea Pakistan was also ready.
India didn't even think about Pakistan while testing. Our aim was to scare someone else and even today is same. These were Pakistanis who love to hyphenate themselves with India.
In fact by USA's own admission they to didn't know.
Do you know, India is developing nuclear torpedoes in Tajikistan?
Only to see Pakistan conducting tests a few days late. Because Pakistan does far more cold tests than India our Missiles dont fail when fired.
Nirahy falls on some Farmer's cahsew nut plantation and keeps falling.
Let me inform you that missiles don't undergo Cold Tests!:lol:
They undergo wind tunnel testing, dummy testing, drop testing, CFD simulations and then, final firing.
US, USR, PRC, EU & India, all have suffered failures even after simulations.
Yes India is developing the or Trying to develop the long list of Engines you mentioned. Its another thing hat Kaveri won't power tejas as below par performance and Brahmos engine is Russian import.
Case is also different that Pakistan can't even make an engine like Kaveri being far behind in metallurgical constraints.

Case is different that India has finally developed small HTFE-25 engine for it's trainer aircrafts. We are working hot corrosion resistant nickel based superalloys and we will get a breakthrough one day.
Even US, Russia also take long time when they make a new engine.
The Laghu Shakti egine used on Nirbhay was seen flaming out during the test.
Yes it will be improved and yes eventually it may stop flaming and perform as neede but at what cost?
It's the cost which other countries also paid for decades when they were developing all it.
Today, they can give their army something exclusive which other's can't have because it's nor for sale.
On the other hand Pakistan skipped all that,bought NPO reliable engines and deployed Babur 10 years ago.
So a more practical approach that works very well.
NPO will also get outdated some day.
It's a mere a short term approach and completely dependent on what your country.
Pakistan was dependent on US, now on China, tomorrow it will be dependent on others. India has a altogether different ambitions. India prefers to import systems initially but till only gets it's own.

Countering China: India’s Uncertain Response – Analysis

The Myth of India’s Non-Aligned Boycott

India as a Leading Power
Though outdated stats to some extent (India has performed much better economically than written here).
Related Thread:
India's strategic implications, challenges, opportunities and quest for great power status in a bipolar world
India is simply a very big country with huge population, it hurts long term's interests and ambitions if dependent on others.

India's drift towards is temporary, around till 2030-35 when it itself can play role somwhat US, Russia and China are playing.

So, as the time passes, India's homegrown weapons will get more advanced and it's policies will keep becoming more aggressive.
Problem is planning of Indian Missiles is upside down. The missile is developed seperately, the platform developed on it's own and warheads available are not even kept into consideration.
For example Brahmos was developed without any consideration for launch platforms. It is too heavy for Sukhoi and too wide for submarines.
IAF SU-30 had to be specially modified at great cost for being able to carry just one Brahmos and only one SU-30 has so far been modified that way,so in effect only one IAF SU-30MKI can even carry Brahmos. Firing test is yet to ne done.
Due to being too wide no Indian sub can fire it from torpedo tube and will have to be specially re-fitted with VLS,whenever that happens.
Yes ships can fire Brahmos and so can land based launchers , but the launc platforms will need to be within 300 Kilometers of Pakistani borders to have any results as the missile only has 300Km range.

On the other Hand Pakistan build everything in conjunction. For example babur was developed while keeping in mind 533mm dia of Submarine Torpedo tubes which is standard. babur Dia is 520mm , so it can have water tight casing for being fired from submarine if needed. No modification will be neded on PN Agosta.
Also Pakistan developed a seperate light weight ALCM for PAF,so that every available aircraft can carry it without expensive modifications.
Every jet in PAF fleet can carry two or at least one Raad ALCM.
Also dimensions and weight of our Ballistic Missiles were kept in line with available TEL,to make them all terrain. And thats Pakistan's second strike capability. All Pakistani Ballistic missiles are on offroad vehicles which can go hide in desolated places where enemy first strike isn't gona happen and then launch a reply attack from some desesert , forest or mountain.
India gave TEL contracts to Private companies who didn't do a good Job. Agni TEL looks like a freight train and the turning circle is so large that the thing can barely travel on major highways let alone a small road and due to low ground clearance and being very long,definitely not offroad.
Only Prithvi launchers can do limited offroading.
At first place:
  1. BrahMos wasn't intended for being SLCM or ALCM while was being developed.
  2. Agni TEL? It has to travel a large distance.
  3. It's Pakistan who must be making weapons against India; India's policies aren't Pakistan centric. Three major Battleships of India can make Pakistan "Navy Less" in few days. Air & Ground Forces aren't smaller either. They are many times bigger in manpower and equipment.
Also the amout of Plutonium and Weapon grade Uranium available to India at the moment isnt too big and yes they have Fuel quality uranium in large quantity which also can be used to make very heavy Nuclear warheads not ligh ones.
So what exactly is the point in making MIRV capable missiles when warheads cannot be made for them? Or even a nuclear cruise missile which will also need very small warhead?
India has got 28% of world's total Thorium reserves and can convert it in usable nuclear ammo by it's fast breeder reactor.
In fact currently Pakistan has more Nuclear warheds than India,so even if India has more and more types of Missiles,
  1. India has 21 (6 more under construction) nuclear reactors, Pakistan has 4. India directs most of material towards civil sector is different case, Pakistan itself blamed India to have enough material for 2,000 w
  2. India produces 385 tonnes of Uranium annually, Pak @ just 45.
  3. India has interceptors to block a considerable fraction of missile attacks, Pak can't.
  4. India is a far bigger country, enough to absorb a nuke attack and strike back, Pak can't.
  5. Indian Conventional Forces are enough big to nullify any nuclear attack without India using nuclear weapons. India is known to have/making thermobaic & vaccum bombs which can play the role of tactical nuclear weapons alone.
  6. India has some of world's most powerful spy satellites with resolution in centimeters to track & crack the any country's missiles before they are launched.
  7. India has demonstrated it's MIRV technology by launching multiple satellites in one go, many times.
  8. India has thermonuclear warheads, and how reliable our tech is, International Union selected us to work on world's first thermonuclear reactor.
  9. India has or is making NBC Bunkers in major cities, so our people will be safe, not yours.
  10. India has laser, electromagnetic, Biological & Chemical weapons besides nuclear ones, Pak hasn't. India has also been alleged to develop a dedicated city for nuclear research.
Most important thing of all, Pakistani nuclear doctrine isn't about dropping nuclear bombs in India. Pakistani nuclear bombs are too small for that.
It's retaliation to India's cold start doctrine that if Indian soldiers enter Pakistani territory, they will be bombed (Pak is ready to nuke it's own land). Even for it's remedy, India is working on NBC APCs which can survive under a WMD attack.

Ask for sources BTW.
there is no point as they don't have amounts and types of warhed for the misisles. Its same as having the gun but no bullets.
I don't think so. India is made most strides in civil sector. From LWRs to PHWRs, FBRs & Particle accelerators & fast supercomputers for simulations. From nuclear powered submarine, to current program on nuclear powered space mission.
Everything what P5 has.
And India can't make warheads?
that's why Pakistan isn't rushing into building SLBM as our land based missiles are currently enough to act as second strike capabilities,
Second strike capability stands for absorbing a nuclear attack and then, retaliating back. Which is impossible for a small country like Pakistan.
Further, Pak isn't rushing for SLBMs because it has only one enemy, India.

India on the other hand has bigger enemies and bigger aspirations to establish itself as a hard power.
India has or making everything what UNSC permanent members have.
In fact, India is already beaten down UK and France. India has nuclear triad, scramjets, HGVs, they don't.

Only nuclear doesn't define Indian dreams, India works everywhere,
They file a lot of patents, top Asian Innovation chart, institutions breaking into major ones even after fact that its a developing country, they could make very successful rockets, could throw damned objects on other celestial bodies, their spacecrafts could find water on Moon, their telescopes could discover new black holes and red giants or they could throw 20 sats in a single shot, they could be breaking into world's biggest and fastest growing economies with foreign reserves more than double of USA, their missiles could cover entire Europe, they may be maintaining some of world's largest armed forces, with military budget exceeding Russia's, may have a collider four times bigger than CERN and their companies could have revenue close to the size of GDP of many countries or a lot, which is called full spectrum work.
and not rushing for more types of Missiles as Pakistan al;ready has more types of nuclear capable missiles than India.
Factually Incorrect
You wrote this bs because Pakistan could induct an MRBM before India inducts it's ICBM?
:facepalm:
 

safriz

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
147
Likes
78
Country flag
@safriz ............. Let me make few things clear for you.

India has not yet developed MIRV let alone deploy it. So comparing nose cones as of now is out of question. @sayareakd already posted one pic for multiple warhead of Prithvi, although its not MIRV, but it does prove the concept that MIRV could be fitted inside a typical conical nose cone. For the sake of your satisfaction, I am posting a pic of US Peacekeeper missile which did had nearly same diameter dimension of A5.
View attachment 12933
Now we all know that it was able to carry 8 MIRVs.

As far as Brahmos is concerned, you should know the fact that it was originally an ASCM. Only after its induction India planned on to build up on its other launching and target possibility. Brahmos was not meant to be fired from Submarine or from a Fighter at the time of conception. India did used its technical knowhow and worked out its way to make it feasible to get fired from all the three armed platform. You might have known, if you have studied, that US had shelved the plan to construct B-1B and opted to launch Peace keeper from a transport aircraft and even did it. Now does this shows their ingenuity of air launching an ICBM or their shortsightedness of not building an Air launch platform for ICBM?

As far as repeated trial of missile is concerned, this is the norm for any country who is on development phase of any technology. Even the missiles which get deployed and are in production phase, undergoes user trial where Missiles are randomly selected from production batch. It only proves the fact that all the missiles getting churned out from production line are trustworthy. In same way if you have seen any gun production facility, it is a norm there to randomly check any of those for reliability.

Moreover we are not satisfied with what we have achieved and want to outdo our self. 2nd flight test of Nirbhay had been a success, but instead of declaring it a success what we did is more and more tests and found out that its not ready. Now imagine if we would have inducted it after the second successful test based on our ground and dry test, then what would have happened if we actually had to fire it? No amount of dry test or ground test in field of aeronautics could provide you a correct fig of operational clearance of the system.
Hi,

I will reply in detail later. But for now read this Indian news report and read the test depth of K-4?
In another thread i said K-15 was tested from only 10 meters and everyone was gaga. But here is the test depth of more sophisticated K-4. calculate how much in meters it is.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/sta...ern-another-nuke-missile-test-1557615--1.html

International norm for SLBM is 50 meters for missiles like Trident as that is a safe depth for the submarine.
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,678
Likes
22,549
Country flag
Hi,

I will reply in detail later. But for now read this Indian news report and read the test depth of K-4?
In another thread i said K-15 was tested from only 10 meters and everyone was gaga. But here is the test depth of more sophisticated K-4. calculate how much in meters it is.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/sta...ern-another-nuke-missile-test-1557615--1.html

International norm for SLBM is 50 meters for missiles like Trident as that is a safe depth for the submarine.
If you have read the article clearly, it mentions something like, rather let me quote it...
it would be from a platform nearly 30 feet deep in the sea.
. It means it would be tested from a depth of 10mtrs this time, no where it has been mentioned from what depth it was tested earlier on.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,242
Likes
55,884
Country flag
Hi,

I will reply in detail later. But for now read this Indian news report and read the test depth of K-4?
In another thread i said K-15 was tested from only 10 meters and everyone was gaga. But here is the test depth of more sophisticated K-4. calculate how much in meters it is.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/sta...ern-another-nuke-missile-test-1557615--1.html

International norm for SLBM is 50 meters for missiles like Trident as that is a safe depth for the submarine.
Use your common sense here, depth mentioned in article is even less than missile's length.
These are only Pakistanis who go gaga for firing a 60km range missile.
If you have read the article clearly, it mentions something like, rather let me quote it... . It means it would be tested from a depth of 10mtrs this time, no where it has been mentioned from what depth it was tested earlier on.
Awe,
Do you guys seriously believe that source?

Length of K-4 is near to 40 feet (12 meters) itself, higher than length mentioned article.

IMO, it's 30 meter mistakenly written as 30 feet.
As these are developmental trials, depth with eventually be increased to 50m or more from 30m.
Testing from 30 feet is bull$hit.
Even in 2014, it was 30 meters.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
Can we please change the thread title. @pmaitra @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @sayareakd @LETHALFORCE

If a confusion is due to lack of proper schooling and education is phony science then why we have to endure this known imbecile's illiterate arguments ?

My suggestion is, " Ballistic Missile Development Program of India beyond Pakistani Cognizance"
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,678
Likes
22,549
Country flag
Use your common sense here, depth mentioned in article is even less than missile's length.
These are only Pakistanis who go gaga for firing a 60km range missile.

Awe,
Do you guys seriously believe that source?

Length of K-4 is near to 40 feet (12 meters) itself, higher than length mentioned article.

IMO, it's 30 meter mistakenly written as 30 feet.
As these are developmental trials, depth with eventually be increased to 50m or more from 30m.
Testing from 30 feet is bull$hit.
Even in 2014, it was 30 meters.
I find anything by H K Rout unpalatable. But on other hand firing K4 from 30 feet underwater means the tip of the missile would be 30 feet underwater or if its fired from a pontoon, it (pontoon) would be around 70 feet under water. :biggrin2:
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,242
Likes
55,884
Country flag
Can we please change the thread title. @pmaitra @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @sayareakd @LETHALFORCE

If a confusion is due to lack of proper schooling and education is phony science then why we have to endure this known imbecile's illiterate arguments ?

My suggestion is, " Ballistic Missile Development Program of India beyond Pakistani Cognizance"
No need for even such threads.

@safriz is a pathetic guy who reads Wikipedia too much and wants to prove that Pakistani missiles are superior because it has more types of MRBMs than India has making ICBMs.
As per him, no weapon except a nuclear ballistic missile is credible in world.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
No need for even such threads.

@safriz is a pathetic guy who reads Wikipedia too much and wants to prove that Pakistani missiles are superior because it has more types of MRBMs than India has making ICBMs.
As per him, no weapon except a nuclear ballistic missile is credible in world.
I don't mind such threads, but they must have appropriate tittle otherwise it will cater Pakistani propaganda. An appropriate title will put it in right genre as well.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
No need for even such threads.

@safriz is a pathetic guy who reads Wikipedia too much and wants to prove that Pakistani missiles are superior because it has more types of MRBMs than India has making ICBMs.
As per him, no weapon except a nuclear ballistic missile is credible in world.
@safriz knows what he is doing. His con must be exposed and be dealt properly. Closing his thread will give him exit, when we should be suffocating his propaganda with proper response.
 

bipin

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
56
Likes
34
@safriz knows what he is doing. His con must be exposed and be dealt properly. Closing his thread will give him exit, when we should be suffocating his propaganda with proper response.
That is his Modus Operandi. Who even remembers what the actual topic was after reading through the filth. Guy never wanted a discussion. He is a fundamentalist to the core. What I have seen him do in this forum:

1. He exploits differences and creates feud between users.
2. He hates Indian culture and openly curses it.
3. He poisons good posts with false information.
4. He admits he spreads Paki propaganda on web and then brags about his Pak fans here. (seriously WTF)

Ek machli pure talab ko ganda kar rahi hai. Not only should question be tagged / title modified to warn users. The user himself be tagged as a troll so that he is exposed. Brand this troll.
 

HariPrasad-1

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
9,574
Likes
21,019
Country flag
A list of Questions here which i ask members to look into and write opinion.

1) Agni-3 has length of 17 meters Diameter of 2 meters, and weighs 22 Tons
Agni-5 has length of 17.5 Meters Diameter of 2 meters and weighs 50 Tons.

How could just 50 Cm increase in length made the Agni-5 more than twice heavier than Agni-3?

================================================================================

2) On Wikipedia page for Agni-3 the warhead size is mentioned as 2.5 Tons.
But later below on the same page under the description RV MK 4 or the description of Missile's Re-Entry Vehicle,it says the Weapon size is 600Kg to 1800 Kg. So that can be taken as the actual weight of the nuclear bomb and the rest is the weight of Re-Entry Vehicle including motors , electronics,fuel and shielding?
Going by that assumption if the bomb has maximum weight of 1800Kg but the missile Payload is mentioned at 2500Kg,then the RV weighs 700 Kg?
Link to Wiki Page in Question

While reading Wikipedia page about Agni-5 i noticed that it says Missile's warhead stage is still under development,meaning something better is on the way. But the current warhead capacity is stated as 1500 Kg
As unlike Agni-3 which has a very large space for Warhead,Agni-5 has a very small space for Warhead as the third stage occupied much of the triangular space on top of stage 2 (as shown in the pictures)
Does that mean the 1.5 Ton mentioned is the Nuclear bomb plus the Re-Entry Vehicle?
Going by what we read in Agni-3 case the RV is 700 KG but total payload capacity of Agni-5 is mentioned at 1500Kg. Then the actual Bomb weight must be 800 Kg?

====================================================================================


Some visual comparison and limits of stages on Agni-3 and Agni-5.

First Agni-5

View attachment 12905

Cable runners on each stage are clearly visible? The narrow linear tubular protrudes? The first stage cable runner ends just below where it says "A5" . So thats the limit of stage 1.
The second stage cable Runner starts just above the DRDO insignia and ends just below the Indian flag,so thats the limits of stage 2?
The thirds stage being tucked away in the triangular section on top has cable runner starting at the ring above Indian flag and ends at the Black cone . So that's the limit of Third stage.. I am assuming that this stage only fires up in the vaccum of space where there is no resistance of air,so despite being very small,adds to the range significantly.
The Warhead or the actual bomb is housed in the Black cone.

3) Since the Black Cone comprises of the Bomb and the shielding and there had to be a gap between the two . Can such a confined space carry 1.5 Tons if considering that the 1.5 ton payload mentioned on wiki is just the bomb weight excluding RV?

================================================================================

For interest sake here are the limits of Agni-3 stages and where the RV starts. watch the cable runners on the side.

View attachment 12906

It can be seen the space for warhead is far larger than what is available on A-5.

==============================================================================

P.S . Myself being of Pakistani origin taking pat in this thread will flare up emotions as it did previously and fill the thread with abuse instead of good discussion,so i will stay away but request members to come and write their analysis and arguments.
Weight of agni 3 is just 22 or 23 tons and not 48 tons. Agni 5 weights just one ton more. 48 ton was the mass of agni 3 TD. Agni iv. With a height just weighs 17 tons so agni iii can't be 3 time heavier. This is revealed by none other than Tessy Thomas. New technology developed since A4 has gone into A3, A4, A 5 and now in A1. We have only A2 is left with old technology. We do not need A2 any more since A4 came in. A3 is a China specific missile and was designed to deliver heavy payload at 3500 to 4000 km and that is why its range was stated very low. It can travel more than 5500 km with 1 ton payload. A5 can travel more than 8000 km with 1.5 ton payload as it is a 3 stage missile with 2 composite stage.
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,000
Likes
2,302
Country flag
Weight of agni 3 is just 22 or 23 tons and not 48 tons. Agni 5 weights just one ton more. .......A5 can travel more than 8000 km with 1.5 ton payload as it is a 3 stage missile with 2 composite stage.
Wait, are you claiming that A5 can throw 1.5t to 8000km with only 24ton weight?
Are you understanding what you are talking about? If this is true, it is kind of missile 20 years ahead of any country in the world!
Do you have source to back it up?
 

airtel

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,432
Likes
7,816
Country flag
Wait, are you claiming that A5 can throw 1.5t to 8000km with only 24ton weight?
Are you understanding what you are talking about? If this is true, it is kind of missile 20 years ahead of any country in the world!
Do you have source to back it up?
Agni -5 is a 50 ton missile ..............officially it's range is 5000 km ...................but according to Chinese it's range is 8000+ Km .

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=155897


Agni -4 is a 17 Ton missile with official Range 4000-6000 km .


Agni -4 is the most advanced Indian missile .
 
Last edited:

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
31,725
Likes
147,017
Country flag
On a lighter note..

To sum up the discussion on the shape of the warhead...

 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top