LOL, did you ask Turkey when they knew how to write? They were barbarian in chinese history, this is nothing about racism, it is just like Aryan was barbarian in Roman history. Should I read rigorous history written by chinese historian in 8th century, or listen to barbarian's legend, of course, not read, they don't know how to write.
Xinjiang, the old chinese name is "Xiyu", means the west land, chinese empire had those land 100 years before Jeaus was born, before Turkey appear in history, before Uyghur tribe existed. In 8th century, after chinese Tang Dynasty Empirer beated Turk moving west and free Uyghur tribe, chinese kindly allow them settle in today's Xinjiang region, Uyghur is the guest of this land, Han is the master of this land. What do you mean RACIST? are you idiot?
"Most of Uyghur are illiteracy, they only recite Koran" did I lie here? what do you mean RACIST? Uyghur doesn't read any history, they just take grant to think they was born there, the land is theirs, the crazy Uyghur extremist want to kill all Han and Hui lived there for thousand years, who is RACIST? 200 PEOPLE were killed in Xinjiang on 2009, July 05, most of them are Han and Hui, who is the RACIST? kill people just because they don't speak Uyghur, look like Han or Hui? Is this RACIST?
Who tell you all Uyghur and Tibetan hate chinese? how many Uyghur and Tibetan you know? There are over 6 million tibetan and 12 million Uyghur living in China!!!
South Tibetan was not Indian land before 1947, if it is your land, your premier Nehru won't need "forward policy", you just need a "stay policy". Listen the land you took, soon or late, have to return back to China, if you don't want your mother land to be dismembered.
The problem with you houde is that your approach to discussion is juvenile and more of a Sir Oracle style, where what you write without quoting facts or links, you want all to believe is the Gospel Truth. You may feel that Mao's saying and the history conjured by the CCP or the imperialist historians of China is beyond doubt, unfortunately the world does not. I daresay, they did not research. Please visit the British Library when you find time in London.
Yes, there were barbarians in China, at least from the Han imperialist point of view – as if the Hans were some superior race descended from the Heavens! Please divorce yourself from such delusions. They were mere imperialists, who wrote history of the 'victors', if you understand what is meant by 'history is written by the victors'.
How does 'Xiyu' which you claims is west land makes it Chinese territory historically? Well , if such a vague term is applicable, what makes the remainder of the world that is west of the Han land, not then be claimed as part of China? A person of your outstanding logic would argue that it does mean so. Now, how can one discuss with a person who has blinkers on?
So, the Chinese started writing even before the world. Jolly good, if you ask me. Now, how many of such writings were available to the common man? Now, that issue is more pertinent than merely writing. It is only when literacy spread was the common man able to read. No, go ahead and tell me that there was universal literacy in China then! You would not surprise me!
It is also pertinent to know that history has also been known through the word of mouth. Modern research confirms many a fact and also many a myth. Do you mean to say that the written history does not contain myths? The Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution was taken as great events in China by the Chinese when it occurred and so did the official history proclaim so. The West had commented on them as disasters, but not so in China because the official version did not say so and the Chinese had no access to the outside world. It is now that the Chinese grudgingly accept and even then they feel Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong. And yet, they flounder to indicate the rationale behind these magic percentages. In other words, this will also become a part of Chinese history that you will tout as the Gospel truth!
Is it surprising for you to be told that the Chinese or rather, the Han, are racists? They are. Or else, why did they call the non Hans 'barbarians' and whose culture, language and traditions the Hans crushed underfoot and made them embrace the Han ways? If that is not racism, what is?
The UIghurs are not guests, it is there land and so, it is the Hans who are the guest – uninvited at that, as are the Hans who took away the lands of the barbarians (as they called the Non Hans). So, revisit history and revisit lexicons!
Of course, those who contrary views to your propaganda and disinformation are idiots. But have you cared to know that you display an unique propensity to display that there is the ideal vacuum between your ears and that you require half a ounce more of brains to be classified as a half wit? Please desist from this obnoxious habit of abusive terms since the same can be said of you.
It is not the Uighurs who just taken for granted what they think it is theirs. It is those who have been brought up on imperialistic propaganda, couched in falsehood by contriving history, who think what is not theirs, as theirs. What is wrong in reciting the Koran. The Chinese parroted and recited Mao's Thoughts from the Little Red Book as if it were the Koran!
If the Uighurs killed the Hans, who came to take away their land, their culture and their religion and made them a minority in their land of their birth, did the Han just sit around meditating the sublime like the Buddha? Ask the Tibetans and the Uighurs of the repression carried out by the Hans.
If the Uighurs loved the Han, then why did the Hans have to kill them?
Arunachal was Indian Territory before 1947. However, it was a Frontier Agency and remote. After independence, infrastructural improvements were done, and the 'forward policy' was not for political reasons or to indicate it was Indian Territory, it was done to bring in military presence, which was absent, thanks to China's placating double speak using the Bandung Principles, and to counter the Chinese aggressive intent and deceit.
You must be daydreaming that you can wrest more land from India. This time around, if the Indian govt wisely applies itself, maybe you should be ready to lose some of your imperialist conquest. Just remember, Tunisia! A repressive govt has been overturned in a country that had religion as a binding factor. China is similar only that it has Communist repression and muzzling free thought as the binding factor.
South Tibetan was not Indian land before 1947, if it is your land, your premier Nehru won't need "forward policy", you just need a "stay policy". Listen the land you took, soon or late, have to return back to China, if you don't want your mother land to be dismembered.[/QUOTE]
The problem with you houde is that your approach to discussion is juvenile and more of a Sir Oracle style, where what you write without quoting facts or links, you want all to believe is the Gospel Truth. You may feel that Mao's saying and the history conjured by the CCP or the imperialist historians of China is beyond doubt, unfortunately the world does not. I daresay, they did not research. Please visit the British Library when you find time in London.
Yes, there were barbarians in China, at least from the Han imperialist point of view – as if the Hans were some superior race descended from the Heavens! Please divorce yourself from such delusions. They were mere imperialists, who wrote history of the 'victors', if you understand what is meant by 'history is written by the victors'.
How does 'Xiyu' which you claims is west land makes it Chinese territory historically? Well , if such a vague term is applicable, what makes the remainder of the world that is west of the Han land, not then be claimed as part of China? A person of your outstanding logic would argue that it does mean so. Now, how can one discuss with a person who has blinkers on?
So, the Chinese started writing even before the world. Jolly good, if you ask me. Now, how many of such writings were available to the common man? Now, that issue is more pertinent than merely writing. It is only when literacy spread was the common man able to read. No, go ahead and tell me that there was universal literacy in China then! You would not surprise me!
It is also pertinent to know that history has also been known through the word of mouth. Modern research confirms many a fact and also many a myth. Do you mean to say that the written history does not contain myths? The Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution was taken as great events in China by the Chinese when it occurred and so did the official history proclaim so. The West had commented on them as disasters, but not so in China because the official version did not say so and the Chinese had no access to the outside world. It is now that the Chinese grudgingly accept and even then they feel Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong. And yet, they flounder to indicate the rationale behind these magic percentages. In other words, this will also become a part of Chinese history that you will tout as the Gospel truth!
Is it surprising for you to be told that the Chinese or rather, the Han, are racists? They are. Or else, why did they call the non Hans 'barbarians' and whose culture, language and traditions the Hans crushed underfoot and made them embrace the Han ways? If that is not racism, what is?
The UIghurs are not guests, it is there land and so, it is the Hans who are the guest – uninvited at that, as are the Hans who took away the lands of the barbarians (as they called the Non Hans). So, revisit history and revisit lexicons!
Of course, those who contrary views to your propaganda and disinformation are idiots. But have you cared to know that you display an unique propensity to display that there is the ideal vacuum between your ears and that you require half a ounce more of brains to be classified as a half wit? Please desist from this obnoxious habit of abusive terms since the same can be said of you.
It is not the Uighurs who just taken for granted what they think it is theirs. It is those who have been brought up on imperialistic propaganda, couched in falsehood by contriving history, who think what is not theirs, as theirs. What is wrong in reciting the Koran. The Chinese parroted and recited Mao's Thoughts from the Little Red Book as if it were the Koran!
If the Uighurs killed the Hans, who came to take away their land, their culture and their religion and made them a minority in their land of their birth, did the Han just sit around meditating the sublime like the Buddha? Ask the Tibetans and the Uighurs of the repression carried out by the Hans.
If the Uighurs loved the Han, then why did the Hans have to kill them?
Arunachal was Indian Territory before 1947. However, it was a Frontier Agency and remote. After independence, infrastructural improvements were done, and the 'forward policy' was not for political reasons or to indicate it was Indian Territory, it was done to bring in military presence, which was absent, thanks to China's placating double speak using the Bandung Principles, and to counter the Chinese aggressive intent and deceit.
You must be daydreaming that you can wrest more land from India. This time around, if the Indian govt wisely applies itself, maybe you should be ready to lose some of your imperialist conquest. Just remember, Tunisia! A repressive govt has been overturned in a country that had religion as a binding factor. China is similar only that it has Communist repression and muzzling free thought as the binding factor.
