Sikh Harassed in Pakistan - Social Experiment

Hemu Vikram Aditya

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
1,107
Likes
968
Country flag
Abey kahan ki baat kahan le aya.


I am talking about Afghan Lodi tribe of Pasthuns and you are jumping to these OBC Lodhi "Rajputs"



Kalyan Singh is a Lodhi and how is he realted with Afghan Lodi ?


View attachment 14553
Sorry then I was confused but didn't the lodhis and sayyid recruited loads of these Punjabi musalman in their army
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Sorry then I was confused but didn't the lodhis and sayyid recruited loads of these Punjabi musalman in their army
All sultanate and Mughal Rulers recruited from locals. Some locals converted for social mobility some remained Hindus but still reach high position.

In general, Hindustani Muslaman were considered inferior and labeled as Ajlaf or Kamin. They were consider not fit to rule.


Learn about the incident of Rihan a Hindustani Muslaman and how he was Humiliated by Balban.
 

LordOfTheUnderworlds

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
1,299
Likes
1,379
Country flag
:lol: Typical Pakis how desperately trying to show that Sikhs are part of Pakistan even though there are not more than 20,000 Sikhs in Pakistan who ruled the Punjabi Musalman as masters of Punjab.


Their Mosques were converted into Horse stable and Armoury. This is how Sikhs treated Punjabi Musalman like Dirt.



It's common for Punjabi Musalman to hide behind successful Kafir communities like Hindu Khatris, Mohyals and Sikhs because they have no other achievement of their own .



Tell us how many great Empires made by Punjabi Musalman. The answer is zero :lol:
Punjabi mussalman is not very old phenomenon. And they do have their mini kingdom/ Jaagir now. Even if they got it on platter without doing anything.

Anyway this question often asked to Pakistanis (why there is no empire in history created by 'Pakistanis') is in a way wrong. How is that possible. Any region would have some old history of some kingdom or empire.

Problem is the imperial centre here is in Delhi/Hastinapur planes. Farther east waht is now Pakistani Punjab is the outskirts of these ancient empires. Hence they can not call it their own. Because ideological basis for Pakistan is completely different, not related to native historical narrative. In fact it is exactly opposite as it requires claiming foreign origins.

But Punjabi Mussalmans (their elites) now have this artificial country/ Jaagir (with pseudo-history written by Urdu 'poets' and fiction writers from North-central India). They can't let go all the land and wealth they received by accident. They are too greedy. Anyway it is natural for people to try to preserve the status quo.

So they must do the juggling act of claiming the pseudo-history of Ganga-Jamni Urdu poets and at the same time claiming to be sons of the soils and hence legitimate 'owners' of the land, Indus valley civilization and Sikh empire (NWFP) and creating new phrases out of their behinds like Indus-people, Ganga-land and such rubbish.

Bahot confusing ha.
 
Last edited:

pringles

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2017
Messages
124
Likes
306
It took 70 years for this gutter of a country to give basic human rights to Hindus. It's really amusing to see them claiming to be champions of secularism.

President Mamnoon promulgates Hindu Marriage Bill into law

They haven't even left the Muslims of Kashmir alone, ethnically cleansed all Shias from Mirpur, Gilgit Baltistan, to replace with Sunni tribesmen.

Now they pat their own backs by making Youtube videos.
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Punjabi mussalman is not very old phenomenon. And they do have their mini kingdom/ Jaagir now.
Very limited, as 2/3 of the land in what is now Pakistani Punjab were owned by Hindus and Sikhs before partition along with majority of colleges, schools and Hospitals etc. Karanchi was city of rich Hindus before partition. In Sindh Hindus were rich mahajans.


The first Doctors, graduates, scientists, Pilots etc etc of Indian subcontinent were Hindus and Muslaman (now Pak) were mostly peasants.


Sindhi Musalman are still treated as servants by Hindu Rajputs and they will still shine the boots of Hindu Rajputs of Pkaistan



 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
This is fake. Those inbred Pakis standing in a 4 - 5 group near the incident were waiting for their part of the drama.


Paki sale ek propaganda video bhi theek se nahin bana sakte. Salee fake chutiya Qom
 

F-14B

#iamPUROHIT
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,076
Likes
4,006
Country flag
Very limited, as 2/3 of the land in what is now Pakistani Punjab were owned by Hindus and Sikhs before partition along with majority of colleges, schools and Hospitals etc. Karanchi was city of rich Hindus before partition. In Sindh Hindus were rich mahajans.


The first Doctors, graduates, scientists, Pilots etc etc of Indian subcontinent were Hindus and Muslaman (now Pak) were mostly peasants.


Sindhi Musalman are still treated as servants by Hindu Rajputs and they will still shine the boots of Hindu Rajputs of Pkaistan




Isnt he the rana of rawalkot ???
 

Hemu Vikram Aditya

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
1,107
Likes
968
Country flag
Isnt he the rana of rawalkot ???
Actually the Most of the Sindh Was Ruled By Hindu Rulers , if it wasn't for the family of Maharaja of Umerkot and Sindh it would have Been integrated Into Our BHARAT
 
Last edited:

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
ranjit singh was the most able administrator of pakistan which they don't recognize

http://dailysikhupdates.com/royal-palace-maharaja-ranjit-singh-turned-vegetable-market-pakistan/

Ranjeet Singh's rise led to creation of Pakistan'


CHANDIGARH: Maharaja Ranjeet Singh's rise was one of the factors for creation of Pakistan, which was a product of Muslims' fear after the fall of Mughal Empire. This was disclosed here on Sunday by the author of the recently released book, 'Tinderbox: The Past and Future of Pakistan', MJ Akbar, while talking to the intelligentsia of the city, which he rates high in intellectual circles.

Akbar quoted a Taliban commander saying, 'Jihad is not very recent, we have been fighting for 200 years', indicating the regime of Ranjeet Singh that stretched up to Afghanistan.

Pakistan was a product of the fear of Muslims, who could not forget the glory of Mughals and 500 years of their rule over India. The author said due to the accommodative culture of Punjab, which had Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims, the Muslim League had to taste defeat, but the same region became the bloodiest place when Pakistan's founder Mohmmed Ali Jinnah exploited these fears.


Akbar said his book quotes letters of Jinnah to Muslim clerics of Punjab expressing fear for community, which earlier gave just 10% votes in the 1936 election and supported a pro-peasant and secular Unionist party with 101 seats out of a total of 175 seats in the Punjab assembly. The Muslim League won just two seats and Akalis won only 10 seats. Akbar accepted the role of the Unionist Party when an IAS officer HIS Garewal pointed it out showing a gazette notification of the election. The author said Mahatma Gandhi was so sure of Punjab's cultural harmony that he chose to stay put in East Bengal to stop any communal flare up. Because of his influence there was no communal violence in the region in the East. Gandhi miscalculated the scene in Punjab, vitiated after Jinnah turned communal from secular, when he rejected a separate vote for Muslims in 1936 polls.




'Creation of Pakistan was the most stupid decision a section of Muslims could have taken for even the growth of the community,' he said. He explained that due to fear factor, Pakistanis behave in the manner they do at the negotiations with India.




Expressing happiness over the developments unfolding in the world with Gandhian non-violent protest becoming a tool in the recent Arab world uprisings, he said the ideology of India was stronger and that of Pakistan self-defeating.




When asked how to deal with Pakistan, he said there was no answer to this. 'One of the lessons that we can learn from this is how America dealt with the Communist Soviet Union, they economically isolated USSR for the Left ideology to die its own death. We can leave Pakistan in the same state, but as we share borders, this option may not be viable,' he remarked.



Former Punjab chief minister Amarinder Singh said Pakistan seems to have become a hopeless case since the Islamization of Army in Pakistan during the period of General Zia Ul Haq.
 

OverLoad

Snake Eater
Regular Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
102
Likes
26
The first Doctors, graduates, scientists, Pilots etc etc of Indian subcontinent were Hindus and Muslaman (now Pak) were mostly peasants.
Because they are all illegitimate children of Mughal Muslims who taken care of them since they are their children.
Mughals give them lands through their mothers and make them rich and with this money they flourish and get good education abroad.


In Pakistan minorities even these bastards still consider Pakistanis so it is because of Pakistan and Justice.
 

OverLoad

Snake Eater
Regular Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
102
Likes
26
Mughals are sex machines they fucked each and every native Hindu good looking women so be proud of Muslim products ... Don't you

for more than 1000 years they fucked all your grannies.:rofl:
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Because they are all illegitimate children of Mughal Muslims who taken care of them since they are their children.
Mughals give them lands through their mothers and make them rich and with this money they flourish and get good education abroad.


In Pakistan minorities even these bastards still consider Pakistanis so it is because of Pakistan and Justice.

Actually your Sir sayyed Ahmad khan and early leaders of Musalman League were shinning the British boots and begging them to provide western education for Muzzies and recruitment in govt services. Hindus on the other hand were landed elite, Doctors, teachers, scientists, first Noble prize winner from Asia. Even IVC was discovered by Indians from present day India and British. Rakhal Das Banerjee.



Mughals were themselves lacked scientific temper as a backward Muzzies and India lost it's place in the world under those savage Mughal Pigs.

Not much have change since then. Subcontinent Musalman are still most backward religious group and both Pakis and Bangladeshi alaways beg Indian visas for Indian Health services.
 
Last edited:

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Mughals are sex machines they fucked each and every native Hindu good looking women so be proud of Muslim products ... Don't you

for more than 1000 years they fucked all your grannies.:rofl:

Says a converted lowly Muzzy who lost his identity upon conversion to Arab religion.


We are still Hindus only Rapechild lost their religion, history, culture and now take proud of their rapists.
 

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
In the Pakistani province of Sind, Muslim followers of the Agha Khan consider him the tenth incarnation of Vishnu and their rituals contain an odd mix of Hindu and Islamic ideas.

The Husaini Brahmans of Gujarat, who take their name from Mohammed's grandson Husain, consider the Vedic Atharaveda their sacred book.

http://www.indiatomorrow.co/nation/...asically-hindus-pakistani-lady-scholar-admits

explaining her viewpoint lucidly, Fauzia said that most Pakistani Muslims believe they are the offspring of the Muslim invaders who came attacking the sub-continent from Muslim lands. But this is an unalloyed falsehood. Any person having a hint of common sense would know that the ancestors of more than 99 percent Pakistanis were Hindus. Unfortunately, Pakistan does not want to admit the bitter truth, nor are the Pakistanis prepared to hear it, she averred.

One simply marvels at the extensively propagated falsehood that Pakistani Muslims are progeny of Arab or Turk invaders. Equally dumb is the assertion that the forefathers of today’s Muslims in Pakistan and India were converted by Sufi saints. Anyone who reads the history of the sub-continent objectively would know that lakhs of Hindus were killed and forcibly converted by Muslim invaders on pain of death. The deep blood relationship between the Muslims and Hindus of the sub-continent is further reinforced by the fact that many surnames like Cheema, Bajwa, Ghakhar, Sethi and also Sehgal (or Saigols) are common to both communities.

Among other things, Fauzia pointed out that it is not wrong to call Pakistan a terrorist state because it has been sheltering terrorists for a long time. The truth was exposed when Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan by American
commandos.
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Porkies suffer from identity crisis and Stockholm syndrome. They are like a rape victim who love to name their Harami Rapechild after the Rapist who banged them.


Chutiya porkies Gadhe ko Ghoda kahne se vo Ghoda nahi ho jata :lol:
 

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
porus, jaypal , chandragupta maurya where from the region called pakistan

how come rajut case jajja common in both india and pakistan?

how come jatt are in hindus and pakistan

how come bhatti surname common

how come awan surname derived from sanskrit

examples are many
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top