Shove MRCA in favor of AMCA

Discussion in 'Indian Air Force' started by shiv, Apr 18, 2009.

  1. ppgj

    ppgj Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    162
    well delays may not be ruled out considering the complexities involved. better to wait on that. but to cancel a programme in lieu of MCA which is not even in design stage is a bit too far fetched. plus it gives indian aviation specialists loads of experience for MCA. PAKFA is a reality in tech demo stage while MCA is not even in design stage. 5 or more billion dollar, india can afford in current circumstances.

    gorshkov controversy has been made bigger than it deserves. india's ex chief is on record that it is worth the monies being spent. he infact challenged people to get a similar AC with the revised cost from any one. he offered a blank cheque!! :wink:

    agree but the issue is it is still not out of the box. right now indians are busy operationalising LCA 1 now and LCA2 later. MCA is only after that.

    no problem.

    atleast russia cares more than anybody else. considering they have india as their biggest market, it only serves their interest.

    as for the critical components, india is still behind. will only gain with this programme.

    that is exactly why this programme is a joint venture. post its success, india will be in a good position to be an aerospace power.

    mere capital infusion in india is not going to help because it is still behind in critical areas like radars, engines.

    while capital won't be an issue considering india's present growth, it is the experience in such projects which is going to help india to set up a base for r&d for the future. hence PAKFA cancellation for MCA is not even worth a thought from an indian pov.
     
    AkhandBharat likes this.
  2. body5in

    body5in New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    well even if the MCA is developed by 2020..it will take us 7 more years to get them in required numbers..moreover its a question of reliability so the mmrca is supposed to provide the qualitative edge.:viannen_10:
     
  3. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    2,480
    AND i don`t think it will ever satisfy IAF technicians competely
     
  4. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,291
    Likes Received:
    11,485
    Location:
    BANGalore
    and why would the IAF not be satisfied with the LCA? Just recently the MoD has said the program is going very well now.
     
  5. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    2,480
    its MoD said but i dont think IAF to hold similar views
     
  6. mehrotraprince

    mehrotraprince Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    212
    Location:
    India
    MCA not possible before LCA Mark II gets operational and Kaveri Mark II engine pass the required tests. I don't see it before 2020.
    Major challenge for us is development of Engine and then Radar.
     
  7. gogbot

    gogbot Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    118
    Well i was hoping for a pre-2020 , test for the MCA .

    And also the KVAeri mk-II wont be enough.

    The KAveri-NG still on the drawing board is needed.

    Before that the Kaveri Mk-II needs extensive use on the LCA and may be other platforms .

    Let alone radar, materials , avionics etc .
     
  8. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would shove mmrca for tejas mk-2 and shove FGFA for AMCA.
     
  9. neo29

    neo29 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    india
    We already have problems with LCA. It took us a long time to design it and we have engines, aesa radar, refuelling probe issues. Dont know how long these issues will take to get sorted. There is still time for IOC. When we have not successfully flown a 4.5th gen fighter except on paper it is not wise to take such a huge step to MCA.
     
  10. Crusader53

    Crusader53 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida
    India has to think more wisely with it resources. As it has many projects to fund..............
     
  11. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    One of the reasons mmrca rfp was postponed till 2006 was that, India was still in talks with Russia for a 5th generation light weight fighter like f-35. Since that has fallen through, India on its part is to concentrate on avionics of fgfa which can be employed in amca without any re-design bar software. Whether we like it or not, amca induction in 2025 itself is too good. Mmrca by now is inevitable, if finances don't come into play.
     
  12. charlie

    charlie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    984
    Likes Received:
    726
    this seems to be a pointless discussion because even the design has not been finalized they are just testing a design and the HAL is still working with the Indian air force to know what their actual needs are i not even sure that by 2013 they will even complete the design, it takes at-lest 10 to 15 years to develop an aircraft and developing a 5th generation one will take more time as US and Russia took long time to build the 5th generation aircraft and the way India manges it project it will take longer then them, so if there is no ban on technology and if India keeps on track on the project then we can get the aircraft prototype by 2020
     
  13. sandeepdg

    sandeepdg Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    223
    Location:
    Gurgaon/Noida
    Why are we discussing about a project that has still not taken off even in design (MCA) against those that we are supposed to get in a short while (MMRCA and LCA Mark-2) ?? Plus these projects are need of the hour as compared to the 5th genr. MCA !!
     
  14. ace009

    ace009 Freakin' Fighter fan Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    517
    Location:
    New England, USA
    As I mentioned in my post elsewhere, I belive we should change the AMCA program to a potential 6th Gen combat aircraft while getting into the F-36 program for our strike fighter need. The MMRCA is needed for the short term and that should go ahead as it is. Here are the points ...
    1. India does not have a tactical bomber, far less a strategic bomber. The strategic command has recently asked for two squadrons of strategic strike fighters for this purpose. We can get into the F-35 program for this alone.
    2. Since India does not have any dedicated tactical bombers, it is time we develop a program especially for that. Now, the "bomb truck" commentators will question why we need any tactical bombers at all? Can't missiles do the same job? Well, the answer is yes and no. Missiles are effective for a single target (or for multi-target warheads, "blind" multiple targets, which as of yet, India has none). a strike fighter or a tactical bomber can take out multiple targets especially "differentiate" between friend and foe during a ground assault. Also, a missile is expensive for many purposes (taking out a machine gun nest, an infantry dugout etc). A strike fighter or a tactical bomber using a "dumb bomb" is way cheaper, provided the aircraft returns unharmed. Which is why India needs an advanced strike fighter with stealth features (like the AMCA in the plans).
    3. Ground attack aircraft are the "real" attack aircraft. Air-defense / air superiority is important, but is not enough to win the war on the ground. And as we have seen in the last 25-30 years, that's what matters in the end. A multi-role aircraft can only deliver so much punch - after all it is primarily a "air-defense" aircraft, with limited attack capabilities. India does not have any aircraft like this except for the old Jaguars and to some extent the Mig 27, all of which are nearing the end of their service life and should definitely be phased out by 2020.
    4. With modern radar and electronic detection technology, any combat aircraft operating in enemy territory (e.g. ground attack aircraft) will need a certain degree of "stealth" to avoid detection and counter attack from SAM or air-defense fighters. None of current Indian aircraft have such features. And I doubt the top-of-the-line expensive as hell, air-superiority fighter FGFA, albeit "stealthy", when inducted will be used for deep strike purposes in enemy territory.

    So, in my HO, India needs a tactical strike fighter, which is designed specifically for ground attack, but has enough "fighter" capabilities to defend itself in a pinch. India is already planning the AMCA for this role, however, the development plans are too long. We can easily get the F-35 to fill that role.

    As for the MMRCA, I do agree it is a more immediate need for the IAF. So, let's go ahead and buy that now and ensure delivery by 2014. The F-35 should be bought in place of the AMCA as a "strike fighter". The AMCA should be pushed back to a 6th generation combat aircraft, i.e. an unmanned multi-role fighter aircraft with advanced stealth features.
     
  15. roma

    roma NRI in Europe Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,575
    Likes Received:
    2,480
    Sir although i heartily agree with you in favour of MRCA - isnt it also a fact the even the MRCA itself is also taking a rather foot-dragging heck-of-a-load of time to get done ?
     
  16. Vladimir79

    Vladimir79 Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,404
    Likes Received:
    65
    Who is to say there will even be a 6th gen fighter? Experts today say air wars will be unmanned by that time and the days of piloted fighters are numbered. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

    F-35 is not a strategic anything. It is only a tactical strike fighter.

    The MMRCA will be the tactical bomber. MKI can fill that roll with the weapons for PAK FA. Guided bombs are nothing but dumb bombs with a kit.

    The term you are looking for is CAS, Close Air Support. That role is covered by attack helicopters and Jags. It will be covered in the future by UCAVs, LCH, and precision munitions from MMRCA.

    They don't need high levels of stealth, they need stand-off weapons. That comes with MMRCA.

    The F-35 with an internal loadout can't carry enough munitions for the flight to be worth it in a CAS role. Once it loads up external pylons it becomes as visible as an F-16. If it is getting that visible on the front lines it will end up in dogfights where it can be dominated rather easily. Its primary role is dropping JDAMs on high priority targets in high threat environments, not buzzing over troops dropping dumb bombs.
     
  17. ashdoc

    ashdoc Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    2,060
    shelving MRCA in favour of AMCA is putting all eggs in DRDO's casket.

    and who is going to trust DRDO ?
     
  18. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    30,964
    Likes Received:
    39,486
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    I for one, SAYs GO FOR AMCA..

    We all know few things :

    1. AMCA is already on drawing board

    2. Critical Components like Radar, engine, electronics, Hud, MFDs, ECM, are all available and already chosen..

    3. The wind tests of the Air-craft are done..


    What our Gov needs to do:

    1. Pump money on defense labs within country which will automatically speed up the projet,

    2. Invite or get foreign advisers in our project ( Russians, Isrealis, freanch etc.. )

    3. Get all necessary deals on time.


    AMCA can have many variants like for immediate use:

    1. It can have same radar as LCA..
    2. Uprated new engines for LCA can be used for AMCA..
    3. Israeli Sufa avionics for Aircraft..
    4. Hud from Thales..
    5. ECM can be of Indian origin also Israeli already in use..


    Besides we are still evaluating on MMRCA, lolzz
    Manufacturing and operational in Indian color is a still a dream..
    The process could be much faster compare to MMRCAs..


    But Again, this is my theory!:happy_7:
     
  19. plugwater

    plugwater Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,149
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    AMCA is scheduled to make its first flight in 2020 and induction in 2025. Pushing more money into projects may not result in faster development of new technologies. We need both MMRCA and AMCA.
     
  20. icecoolben

    icecoolben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    4
    what was our immediate aircraft for MRCA Mirage-2000 which had a 1500 kg engine delivering 64/95 kn of thrust with payload of 6-7 tons on 9 Hard points with range 3000 km. Now where are we Tejas Mk-2 1100 kg F414 engine delivering 63/98 kn thrust with larger engine so every chance to increase hard points from 8 to 10 atleast, and payload from 4500 kg to 6500 kg atleast with 3000 km ferry for mk1. Here u have it MMRCA and Tejas-2 in a nut shell are no differrent.
    Indians are just so generous that we maintain an external debt of $ 230 billion and reserves at $ 270 billion, while we let IAF and GOI go on global shopping west to east for $ 12.5 billion MMRCA, $ 4-5.8 billion c-17 and $ 30 billion for FGFA.
    Who the hell cares "All is well"
    :emot100:
     

Share This Page