Should the Indian Armed forces be loyal to the nation or to the govt ?

venkat · Aug 30, 2010

what is nation and what is Govt here in this context?

Agantrope · Aug 30, 2010

Both the nation and government should be loyal to the nation.

Only one sword can be in a scabbard. So army comes under the government, if not a nation cant develop. Loyalty reflect from the leaders of the nation, example CBI, Police Force, they are loyal to government, inturn who are not loyal to the nation

zolpidam · Aug 30, 2010

I think Democracy is biggest disadvantage for India. I want Army to rule the country . A good cop should come up and remove these moron politician. They are worthless ,

zolpidam · Aug 30, 2010

these politician are here just to play their political game . They are ready to sell country for any thing. We are very poor in our foreign policy especially toward china and pakistan because of them .

Agantrope · Aug 30, 2010

zolpidam said:
I think Democracy is biggest disadvantage for India. I want Army to rule the country . A good cop should come up and remove these moron politician. They are worthless ,

In India coup can never happen. President being the commander of the Tri-forces it is quite impossible

shuvo@y2k10 · Aug 31, 2010

president is just a symbolic commader in chief of armed forces. she does not even have any real power now to declare war or order military modernization. personally speaking she just not have an iota of knowledge about not only indian armed forces but also military as a whole.

Agantrope · Aug 31, 2010

shuvo@y2k10 said:
president is just a symbolic commader in chief of armed forces. she does not even have any real power now to declare war or order military modernization. personally speaking she just not have an iota of knowledge about not only indian armed forces but also military as a whole.

PMO recommends the President to declare the war on the neighbour and that instruction is followed to the Tri-Forces

nranandkumar · Sep 4, 2010

Necessity is the not only the Mother of Invention but also for corruption. what will we do when our family and relation relay on us for there needs.
these need or easily fulfilled through corruption. but corruption in any way is a sin. we can get rid of it only by following a right path to achive our needs.

prateikf · Sep 4, 2010

United regressive alliance

A nice article on the regressive united alliance. A must read for patriots.

171K · Sep 4, 2010

prateikf said:
United regressive alliance

A nice article on the regressive united alliance. A must read for patriots.

Grim reading on page 2!

Some of that confusion has begun to show in the performance of the government. The Kashmir Valley is drifting out of control. Nobody seems to know what the party line on the Naxals is. After nearly five years of respite, our security environment, externally as well as internally, has deteriorated a great deal. Between Kashmir, Maoism, Telangana and the build-up to next year's elections that promises months of violent uncertainty in West Bengal, India is back to a state of siege. And the argument that evokes the greatest passion in the ruling establishment is whether the use of the description saffron for Hindu right-wing terror is appropriate or not. The world must be laughing at us.

In fact it is. That is why the external security environment has deteriorated alarmingly. In the kind of neighbourhood we live in, nothing is noted more promptly than a phase of weakness and waffling descending on India. Even if you leave Pakistan aside as the usual suspect, we would be living in denial if we do not read the message from China. They have now checked us out over a year and felt bold enough to escalate gradually to a level where they can deny visa to one of our three-star generals in a much celebrated, ongoing process of military-to-military contact because he serves in Kashmir. Yet they put nearly a division strength of their troops in what India considers its own, or at least disputed, Kashmiri territory. The Chinese are not about to invade. But by reducing us to this impotent, silent rage they are only reminding us of the hollowness of our own claims to any big power status. They are underlining to us, in their typically blunt yet convoluted way, that we are merely a subcontinental power which has issues, Pakistan and Kashmir, to handle within our own neighbourhood. And we, meanwhile, cannot decide to buy an artillery gun for our army in 23 years, have critical defence acquisitions blocked because the director of the CBI produced a list of charges against certain suppliers and has not yet backed it even with an FIR. And do you want to know how scandalous this is? The omnipotent CBI chief, modern-day Indian equivalent of Stalin's infamous hatchet-man Beria (show me the man, I will give you the crime), gave these charges not even on his agency's letterhead but on a plain piece of paper and, most breathtaking of all, did not even sign it. And yet the government, and the mighty Cabinet Committee on Security, have not been able to toss aside this incredible spanner.

nitesh · Sep 4, 2010

prateikf said:
United regressive alliance

A nice article on the regressive united alliance. A must read for patriots.

What's the point you are trying to convey?

arya · Apr 25, 2013

Re: Should the Indian Armed forces be loyal to the nation or to the go

from 2010 i am saying but every one is refusing my words

see today china is 18 km inside we are still helpless

Snuggy321 · Apr 25, 2013