Ha ha I knew , you would say something like thatDon't like it.
Ha ha I knew , you would say something like thatDon't like it.
Of course I would. It does not talk about the unity of India. It talks of "Hindu Rashtra". This song is antithetical to the constitution of India.Ha ha I knew , you would say something like that
What's wrong with Hindu Rashtra ? "Hindu Rashtra" refers to India as a nation, not " Land of Hindu's" alone ! The RSS Anthem praises mother India, if one misinterprets as communal, so be it. Noone can help.Of course I would. It does not talk about the unity of India. It talks of "Hindu Rashtra". This song is antithetical to the constitution of India.
"Hindu Rashtra" does not refer to India as a nation, It refers to "Land of Hindus" only. It is not communal, it is "Hindu supremacist".What's wrong with Hindu Rashtra ? "Hindu Rashtra" refers to India as a nation, not " Land of Hindu's" alone ! The RSS Anthem praises mother India, if one misinterprets as communal, so be it. Noone can help.
Jana Gana Mana anthem was wrote by Rabindranath Tagore for the annulment of the Bengal Partition Act which was to show the unity and diversity of Indian nation when King George V came to India in 1911 as Rabindranath Tagore was against division of Bengal but here even the British supporter made Jana Gana Mana as a poem in praising of Emperor and by 1915 he dissociated himself from any political affiliation and after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919 renounced his knighthood .Of course I would. It does not talk about the unity of India. It talks of "Hindu Rashtra". This song is antithetical to the constitution of India.
Sorry bro, your interpretation is incorrect in the first place."Hindu Rashtra" does not refer to India as a nation, It refers to "Land of Hindus" only. It is not communal, it is "Hindu supremacist".
So you are saying that RSS doesn't divide Indians on the basis of religion ?Sorry bro, your interpretation is incorrect in the first place.
I am a RSS member however, I have not been tought that, Hindu Rashtra or Hindu nation refer to Land of Hindu's only
RSS Prayer
Where is it mentioned that, Hindu Nation = Land of Hindu's only ?
[MENTION=12472]My vote goes for changing the national anthem not because of the reasons you have mentioned but for the fact that, the song was written by Tagore to praise a Br!turd King in the first place as I had read and heard..
And, the ultimate icing on cake, RSS opposes homosexuals. They must be really evil"Hindu Rashtra" does not refer to India as a nation, It refers to "Land of Hindus" only. It is not communal, it is "Hindu supremacist".
Tagore was approached by INC to write a poem in praising the Nation and Tagore wrote in describing the unity and diversity of the country and this poem was first sung at the second day of the annual conference of the Indian National Congress in Calcutta on December 27, 1911. Sarala Devi Chowdhurani — Tagore's niece — intoned the song, along with a few schoolstudents, in front of the gathering of the then INC president Bishan Narayan Dar and other leaders such as Bupendra Nath Bose and Ambika Charan Mazumder.Tagore write that song for our country and many other, Its Congress at the time took that song and sang for the British King ..
Not evil, but with a narrow and staunch outlook.And, the ultimate icing on cake, RSS opposes homosexuals. They must be really evil
Yes. RSS had to take radical stand to protect Hindus against the atrocities caused by Non-Hindu radicals.So you are saying that RSS doesn't divide Indians on the basis of religion ?
I agree ! However, same thing applies to Muslim organisations as well as a Christian missionaries.The Golden Era of Indian Nation which is even called Savarna Yug is possible that time only when the whole nation stand together and If RSS has changed its policies then RSS should cut down their radical members who are making things hard for other right minded Indians just because of their religion and stop judgmental attitude .
If might is right then it should be not on our own people.
Yes. RSS had to take radical stand to protect Hindus against the atrocities caused by Non-Hindu radicals.
But why to target individuals who are having nothing to do with any organization ?I agree ! However, same thing applies to Muslim organisations as well as a Christian missionaries.
Still there are some who has fully not understood this and still threateningLive and let live, everyone will be happy !
This Yug will be for the whole Indian nation and certain people have to keep it in mind.BTW, it's Suvarna Yug not Savarna Yug
Non Hindu radicals ?
But why to target individuals who are having nothing to do with any organization ?
Still there are some who has fully not understood this and still threatening
Which "certain people" ?This Yug will be for the whole Indian nation and certain people have to keep it in mind.
Do you want something militaristic? Most of the anthems are about going to war to overthrow tyranny. I agree, the JGM is not inspiring at all but India is a pacifist country so I don't see an anthem about revolution in its future.I really dislike India's current national anthem. Don't get me wrong, I understand and appreciate the noble intentions behind the composition but it is just so powerless. It fails to inspire a nationalist fervour and sounds too peaceful. For an aspiring superpower and a nation that is on the rise, the anthem is too concerned with ethnic/religious diversity and has nothing to say about progress. Moreover, Jana Gana Mana simply lacks musical sophistication and is not pleasing in an aesthetic sense; that is perhaps its greatest defect. Hence it follows that India should change its national anthem. Agree or disagree?
Just a bit confused .Why are you suprised ? :shocked: You are acting as if you have read it for first time !
There are certain people who are playing since a long time and that should stop . Nothing will happen but have to remember United we stand divide we fall .Who are they ? Any examples ?
Hmm, what needs to be done to tackle those "some blokes" ?
Which "certain people" ?
Sorry, I don't see the Christian minority causing many atrocities in India. GoI is supposed to protect the people from radicals so let them do the job. No one needs RSS paramilitary groups torching churches and mosques.Yes. RSS had to take radical stand to protect Hindus against the atrocities caused by Non-Hindu radicals.
I agree ! However, same thing applies to Muslim organisations as well as a Christian missionaries.