Re: Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology
Yeah, and neither communication is necessary, renounce to language
No, you just learn other languages if it is nececary, simple as that, no need for one single universal language. English become a more world wide known due to several reasons, same as Latin before, but this does not mean that these were or are universal languages.
All technical, scientifical (mathematical, physical entities) should be universally understandable to facilitate world developement, that made all possible so far, isolation is retarted.
Same applies to US where most of knowledge came from education in Europe, and still does.
The only reterded being here is you. There is no isolation in USA, they just have more common to them, but different for us system, simple as that. Besides this if you have problems with calculating short tons to metric tons, this further proves you are retarted... a hint, you can simply calculate this using calculators avaiable in the internet, yeah it is that simple.
Every army should learn from US how to beat third worlders But for those who prepare to fight real war it does not serve.
Russia had been beaten by poorly armed, outnumbered Chechens... yeah we should rather learn from USA, which contrary to popular belief was not beaten by military might in Vietnam. Vietnam was purely politicaly lost, because after Tet offensive Vietcong had been completely destroyed by US forces, and North Vietnam forces were forced to retreat, but left wing parties and organisations forced goverment to withdrawn troops from Vietnam, which was tragic mistake, but after all communist forces were defeated during Tet offensive.
I agree that not everybody has such necessity, thus European countries have been reducing expenses and they are fully right, but from technical aspect it serves as good example.
Russia is hardly a good example.
That is common to all countries.
FCS was very erroneous in concept and requirements which resulted in huge expense and no results at all. It was useless for real conflict both theoretically and technically as no requirements were met anyway.
From where you know that no requirement was not met? You have access to US Army classiefied documents? No, so maybe stop writing such nonsense, you know nothing.
It is completely wrong belief given facts and that there is very great scientifical potential (that is why it is necessary to diversify economy).
Historically Russia always had slavophile policy and no difference was made to such inhabitants, they were considered the same, in contrast with Poles which considered their own people inferior, treated them as slaves and forced religion as imposed by West (now Ukraine, Belarus), of course there are correct people but it is historical contrast.
Goverment after Revolution and it's actions can hardly be applied to Russian nation as most of leadership was not even Russian (slavic), and they have suffered the most from hands of ethnically different goverment.
You know nothing about Poland, which was most tolerant country in mid ages and later, when in europe people were killed due to relligion or other issues, in my country they were capable to live peacfully.
It seems that soviet propagand completely brainwashed you. There are non Polish historians that made enourmous research, and written great books, that are objective. For example mister Ivor Norman Richard Davies have a very high opinion about Poland and he is more credible than some retarted brainwashed Bellarussian.
Maybe it's time to read some objective and impartial historical books written by real historians not Kremlin propagandists?
Because for me, person that studied History, you are nothing more than pure ignorant... and you are literally poorly educated dumb.
What is funny, is that for example King Casimir The Great, even protected Jews, antisemithism in Poland was non existant for a very long period of time.
Even Muslims were peacfully leaving among ethnic Poles, and what is even more funny, they were also providing troops for armed forces, despite many conflicts with muslim countries in southern Europe.
).
, but I lived in the Soviet Union and the child went traveled a lot of the country and felt nowhere, that was restriction of people on nationalities. or the Ukraine - a colony. Suppose I was a teenager and did not understand everything. However, my parents were also not Russian. My father did by nationality - Greek. And they remember a time without fear. Yeah, I do not like modern Russia, but I will always respectfully put to the nation itself
