Rise of Russia(?)

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
I think it is worth thinking that Russia integrates more with East Eurasia and China. It would benefit both, also standard of living and government systems would be more comparable that with the EU. This would free resources from EU to integrate more with Ukraine. The loss of Ukraine would be more than compensated if Russia would integrate with China.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
As in a pragmatic assessment Russia is basically "European" by nature. Its culture, politics, economy and demography is Europe centric. And from Peter the great to Yeltsin and to Putin all their efforts have been made toward integrating with Europe (but EU's instinctive resistance to the bear hug is another story). Even Ukraine used to b indispensible in their Eurasian union blueprint.

Present setbacks with EU won't change Russians' propensity for "going west" ultimately. Meantime enhancing relations with Asia PAC is a rebalancing and an offset in part for the west pressure, in addition to diversifying its trades.

China understands this well as a willing partner.
 
Last edited:

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
It is better to write off debts which you cannot collect.
This is the reason why Russia prefers to deal with India as Russia knows India always pays its debts. :thumb:

Soon all creditors of Pakistan will realize the same as this country is about to implode as well.
@asianobserve
@amoy

Russia just regaining legendary of Society Union, which used to give very high debt to India till its time, but we haven't heard any news stating Russia helping India economically since 1991? most of the time tough bargaining of arm deals, the news we generally discuss here. and its good to see Russia regaining its legendary of SU :truestory:

while we generally consider Russia, a similar type of Industrialized economy like Malaysia, which also depends on oil export to support its economy, while very high pumping of oil/gas by USA since 2008 recession has also been a news. on the other side, we have news about India, China type emerging economies who are putting more money for foreign aid. one thread regarding India im running as below. how would you both see the posts#17, 18? this is the amount, $15billion+ India has put, other than over $1.3billion+ India has for LDCs countries every year, as part its annual budget :india

//defenceforumindia.com/forum/economy-infrastructure/63996-global-shift-foreign-aid-starting-india-2.html#post955552
how would you both answer the post#27?
//defenceforumindia.com/forum/economy-infrastructure/63996-global-shift-foreign-aid-starting-india-2.html#post965862
 
Last edited by a moderator:

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
Any New 2008 type Recession would make a Difference in World

it was always good when we find one category of developed nations and one of 3rd world countries. things were easy to discuss, US/UK/Aus etc are always best places, and its your good luck if you may have even transit visa in Australia type developed countries. but now things changing and getting complex. for example, these so called Industrialized nations have already lost Industries to emerging markets to an extent and losing the remaining ones too with a constant pace. all the techs are getting common for emerging economies and they have at least 6.0%+ a year average growth even since 2008 recession.

while even if its rude to say, but this is how its going to be working. at 90%+ Debt to GDP level, UK and other EU's economies have to make many spending cuts., which would have undermined any further growth prospects. even at 200% Debt to GDP level, an emerging economy would have reduced debt on long run, as it does grow by at least 6%+, with high inflation too. while EU at hardly 1.0%+ growth a year, would hardly match its population growth, while its Per Capita Income adjusting inflation is still around 5% lower than early 2008.....

its really not about saying wrong about any country, but there is a point on what i say. and the worse we will see if we get any other recession like 2008, dont get surprise but the issues of 2008 recession is still present. China type emerging economies have hollowed out the industries of OECD economies, in fact, and there is no sign that China is stoppable...... and if we get any 2008 type recession again, then i dont think they may again borrow debt in the same way like how they did since 2008. for example of UK, its national debt raised from 45% by early 2008 to 95%+ to date, and one more recession like the same will simply make then unanswerable. even if UK recently regained it pre-crisis economic size, its per capita income is still around 5% less than the early 2008 level because of population growth since then. and its the same story of Eurozone as whole, whose economic size is still around 2% lower than early 2008 level, along with twice debt since then.....
even National Debt of US and many of EU's economies is just doubled since early 2008 itself..

only Australia, Canada type mineral rich low population countries would have strong economic future, along with Japan, France, Germany type highly advanced countries would also withstand any new recession, i think. as, even if US with 320million+ people has been doing so much oil/gas pumping since 2009 itself, its National Debt level is well over 105%+ to date.....

=> and the main fun will be to see the circumstances when Industries back to many of today's OECD economies. very high debt they have put to date, and if the industries back, just one more recession is needed in this regard, then they will have very high inflation in beginning, which does mean for high interests payment on the debt they have borrowed to date........ we may see many funny things in coming years
things are so complex that, the interest payment would occur on the Total Debt, which may result in social unrest too in many of those countries
:ranger:

//topforeignstocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Gross-Debt-by-Countries-2012.png
 
Last edited:

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
As in a pragmatic assessment Russia is basically "European" by nature. Its culture, politics, economy and demography is Europe centric. And from Peter the great to Yeltsin and to Putin all their efforts have been made toward integrating with Europe (but EU's instinctive resistance to the bear hug is another story). Even Ukraine used to b indispensible in their Eurasian union blueprint.

Present setbacks with EU won't change Russians' propensity for "going west" ultimately. Meantime enhancing relations with Asia PAC is a rebalancing and an offset in part for the west pressure, in addition to diversifying its trades.

China understands this well as a willing partner.
I work in EU-Russia cross border programs, the will to integrate is great, but it is like trying to mix oil with water. Russia is one of the worst corrupt countries in the world and EU is less corrupt place in the world. The problems are everywhere, but the will is there.
 

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
I work in EU-Russia cross border programs, the will to integrate is great, but it is like trying to mix oil with water. Russia is one of the worst corrupt countries in the world and EU is less corrupt place in the world. The problems are everywhere, but the will is there.

boss, we are in the time of migrants moving from Western Europe to Eastern Europe now, as discuss in the thread, posts#50, #51, #52 as below.
//defenceforumindia.com/forum/europe-russia/64033-eurozone-crisis-online-4.html#post963188
and russians are well aware of the economic scenario of Western Europe, along with their bluffs of publicity about Russia. such a highly indebted and almost economically broke Western Europeans people don't look genuine while talking like this :wave:

but Yes, Finland and few other economies of the Western European region aren't as bad as rest of them :ranger:
 
Last edited:

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
@santosh10, Russia MUST diversify its economy. It must produce 100% food + most other items. The biggest change to be made is to reduce dependence on Europe (specially Germany).

Russia needs to process its minerals. For example, it can export fuels in place of petroleum. It can export petrochemicals. It is a fact that Russia has made a mistake by wasting capital.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
Capital controls feared as Russian rouble collapses
'Funding problems are increasing dramatically. We think Russia is now flirting with systemic problems,' said Danske Bank

The Russian rouble has suffered its steepest one-day drop since the default crisis in 1998 as capital flight accelerates, raising the risk of emergency exchange controls and tightening the noose on Russian companies and bodies with more than $680bn (£432bn) of external debt.
The currency has been in freefall since Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states vetoed calls by weaker Opec members for a cut in crude oil output, a move viewed by the Kremlin as a strategic attack on Russia.
A fresh plunge in Brent prices to a five-year low of $67.50 a barrel on Monday caused the dam to break, triggering a 9pc slide in the rouble in a matter of hours.
Analysts said it took huge intervention by the Russian central bank to stop the rout and stablize the rouble at 52.07 to the dollar. "They must have spent billions," said Tim Ash, at Standard Bank.
It is extremely rare for a major country to collapse in this fashion, and the trauma is likely to have political consequences. "This has become disorderly. There are no real buyers of the rouble. We know that voices close to president Vladimir Putin want capital controls, and we cannot rule this out," said Lars Christensen, at Danske Bank.

"Funding problems are increasing dramatically. We think Russia is now flirting with systemic problems," he added.

Russia has lost its ranking as the world's eighth biggest economy, shrinking in just nine months from a $2.1 trillion petro-giant to a mid-size player comparable with Korea or Spain.
In a further setback, Mr Putin gave the clearest signal yet that the South Stream gas pipeline - intended to supply Europe without going through Ukraine - may never be built. "If Europe does not want to carry it out, then it will not be carried out," he said.
Oil and gas provide two-thirds of Russia's exports and cover half of its fiscal revenues, a classic case of the "Dutch Disease" that leaves the country highly exposed to the ups and down of the commodity cycle.
Some Russian banks have already started limiting withdrawals of dollars and euros to $10,000, an implicit lockdown for big depositors.
Russian premier Dmitry Medvedev said 10 days ago that capital controls are out of the question. "The government, myself, my colleagues and the central bank have repeatedly stated that we are not going to impose any special restrictions on capital flows," he said.
Ksenia Yudaeva, the central bank's deputy governor, said the authorities are battening down the hatches for a "$60 oil scenario" lasting deep into next year. "A long decline is highly probable," she said

Protracted slumps in crude prices crippled the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, and caused Russia to go bankrupt in the late-1990s. "The rouble will not stabilize until oil does," said Kingsmill Bond, at Sberbank.
The bank said Russia faces a mounting deficit on its capital account. The country is no longer generating a big enough trade surplus to cover capital outflows. Sberbank warned that reserves are "likely" to fall to levels that ultimately require capital controls, unless Western sanctions are lifted.
While Russia has $420bn of foreign reserves, this war chest is not as a large as it seems for a country with chronic capital outflows that relies heavily on foreign funding. Lubomir Mitov, from the Institute of International Finance, said investors may start to fret about reserve cover if the figure falls to $330bn.
The rouble's slide has led to fury in the Duma, where populist politician Evgeny Fedorov has called for a criminal investigation of the central bank. Critics say the institution had been taken over by "feminist liberals" and is a tool of the International Monetary Fund. The office of the Russia general prosecutor said on Monday it was opening a probe.


The central bank has refused to intervene to defend the rouble over recent weeks, letting the exchange rate take the strain rather than burning through reserves to delay the inevitable, as Nigeria and Kazakhstan are doing. It squandered $200bn of reserves in a six-week period in late 2008 and triggered an acute banking crisis, learning the hard way that currency intervention entails monetary tightening.
By letting the rouble fall, it shields the Russian budget from the slump in global oil prices, though not entirely. Deutsche Bank said the fiscal balance turns negative at crude prices below $70.
Yet the devaluation is causing prices to spiral upwards in the shops and may at some point cause a self-feeding crisis if it evokes bitter memories of past currencies crashes. The finance ministry said it expects inflation to reach 10pc in the first quarter of 2015.
There is already a dash to buy washing machines, cars and computers before they shoot up in price, a shift in behaviour that signals stress.
The rouble slide is ratcheting up the pressure on Russian companies facing $35bn of redemptions of foreign debt in December alone, mostly in dollars. Yields on Lukoil's 10-year bonds have jumped by 250 basis points since June to 7.5pc.

Maybe the BRICs could loan Russia money.

hmmm Russian ruble generally retreat with oil prices, if it face unusual fall or rise. like, we would see Oil prices won't fall below $90 or rise above $105 in normal case, as how it was for the last 3-4 years. but falling oil price below $70, generally put pressure on the production cost. and if ruble depreciates by 20%, say, then it straight means for 15% to 20% higher price of oil in ruble value, in international market....

also, we just saw Euro falling from 138 to 124 per US$ by last 3-4 months, around 15%, and Japanese Yen followed the same path, nothing different with Russian Ruble. only India Rupees looks strong right now :ranger:
 
Last edited:

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
Putin: Talking to Russia from position of strength is meaningless

Russia is open to the rest of the world and ready for developing equal partnership with other countries, said Vladimir Putin He dismissed treatment Russia through strength and sanctions as ineffective and warned against scheming.

"Talking to Russia from a position of strength is meaningless," said Putin in his annual state of the nation address to the Federal Assembly, stressing that the 'deterrence policy' towards Russia is nothing new.

"The deterrence policy was not invented yesterday, it has been always conducted towards our country, for decades, if not centuries," Putin noted.

"Every time somebody considers Russia is becoming too powerful and independent, such instruments are turned on immediately," said Putin.

US manipulating foreign relations of Russia's neighbors
The US has always been, either directly or behind the scenes, affecting relations between Russia and its neighbors, the president said.

"I've mentioned our American friends for a good reason," Putin said. "Because sometimes you don't even know to whom it is better to talk to: the governments of certain countries or directly with their American patrons."

ABM is a threat to US itself

Further deployment of America's global anti-ballistic missile defense poses a threat to the US and those European countries that agreed to host it, because it builds up a dangerous illusion of invincibility, Putin said.

"This [ABM] constitutes a threat not only to the security of Russia, but to the whole world, in view of the possible destabilization of the strategic balance of powers. I believe this is dangerous for the US itself, as it creates a dangerous illusion of invulnerability and reinforces the tendency of unilateral, often ill-considered decisions and additional risks," Putin said.

The European Phased Adaptive Approach, a centerpiece of the US missile defense shield in Europe, implies deployment of Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers, all of which are fitted with the Aegis weapon and radar system, interceptor batteries in Poland and Romania, radar in Turkey, and a command center at Ramstein, Germany, a US Air Force base.

Russia considers the system to be a major threat to its own security and has threatened to increase its own arsenals and missile shield piercing capabilities in response.

Russia says 'no' to arms race
Russia will not get involved in an expensive arms race, the president said, yet the country's defensive capacity in the new conditions will be securely guaranteed.

"There's no doubt about that – consider it done. Russia has both the capacity and creative decisions to do so," Putin said.

READ MORE: Theft, graft in defense industry equals terrorism - Putin

Yugoslavia-style disintegration scenario for Russia failed
Russia has fought off attempts to initiate its disintegration, similar to the scenario applied to the former Yugoslavia, Putin said.

"They would make us follow the Yugoslavian scenario, with its disintegration and dismemberment of territory, with great relish and with all the resultant tragic consequences for the peoples of Russia. No way. We prevented it," he said.

Putin also recalled the fate of Adolf Hitler, who also planned to destroy Russia, and the Nazis' misanthropic ideas.

"Everyone should remember how that ended," Putin said.


Russia & weakness incompatible
Russia cannot afford the liberty of being weak, Putin added.

"The more we retreat and offer excuses, the more impudent become our opponents, acting in the most cynical and aggressive manner," Putin said.


Putin recalled the situation in the 1990s when Russia showed unprecedented openness to international cooperation, but it faced "the support of separatists from abroad: informational, political, financial and from intelligence agencies, was absolutely evident."

READ MORE: Putin offers amnesty for money coming back to Russia

All that was taking place at a time when Russia "considered its recent enemies as close friends and nearly allies," Putin said.

Ukraine – our 'brother nation'
Vladimir Putin spelt out Russia's special bond with Ukraine as being like a "brother nation" and despite the recent tension between the two countries, this relationship will not change.

"It is well known that Russia has not only supported Ukraine and other 'brother republics' of the former USSR in their seeking sovereignty, but also has contributed significantly to this process in early 1990s. Since then, our position has not changed. Each nation has an inalienable right to its own development path," the Russian president said.

Crimea's reunification with Russia 'historical'
The Russian president stated that Crimea was of huge civilizational and historical relevance for Russia. Putin stated how Crimea was to Russia, what Table Mount is to Jews and Judaism. He commented on how important as a spiritual reference the peninsula has for the Russian people, noting that Prince Vladimir was baptized in Crimea as a Christian, before he would eventually baptize all Rus.

"Exactly on these spiritual grounds our ancestors have perceived themselves as a common nation at the first time and forever," Putin noted. "This gives us all reasons to say that Crimea is of enormous sacral importance for Russia," he said with confidence, noting that "We will take this so once and forever."

Writing the speech himself
The President's Federal Assembly address on the state of the nation and the country's major international and internal policies is one of the political highlights in the country. The annual speech is mentioned in the Russian constitution. This year the tradition marked its 20th anniversary - with the first address having been delivered by President Boris Yeltsin in February 1994.

The speech usually takes around an hour - with Putin's longest address having taken 82 minutes to deliver in 2012, and shortest 47 minutes in 2004. This year Putin spoke for just over an hour, in front of an audience of some 1,100 people at the Kremlin's Georgievsky hall.

With the current situation in the country - both in regards with economic situation and international relations, the president's address had been prepared by Putin himself, as well as last year's speech - a source in president's administration told RIA Novosti news agency.

//rt.com/news/211383-putin-russia-deterrence-policy/
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
I work in EU-Russia cross border programs, the will to integrate is great, but it is like trying to mix oil with water. Russia is one of the worst corrupt countries in the world and EU is less corrupt place in the world. The problems are everywhere, but the will is there.
yeah lots of China - Russia trade goes in transit via Kotka or Hamina across border doesn't it? :D

one thing in common btwn Finns and Chinese is sharing the same neighbour. there's no doubt abt Russian will to integrate with Europe (EU)- just answer a few simple Q's - who're those extravagant tycoons living in London? Russian oligarchs aside from Arabian princes aren't they?! where is the main source of offshore capital in Cyprus? Russia, isn't it?

the heart is where the coffer is! ;)
 
Last edited:

santosh10

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,666
Likes
177
there's no doubt abt Russian will to integrate with Europe (EU)- just answer a few simple Q's - who're those extravagant tycoons living in London?

the heart is where the coffer is! ;)

this way half of the wealth of Super Riches of UK belongs to Russians and Indians only :ranger:

and, Eurozone looks in full mess, badly indebted and economy still below to its pre-crisis level. we have to see how EU as whole turns by the next few years. as, Mr Putin won't be as helpless as Mrs Merkel in future, as below :ranger:


Merkel said Tuesday that full debt sharing would not occur "as long as I live."
June 27, 2012

On the eve of a European summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel touts tighter budgetary controls and says debt sharing will not occur 'as long as I live.'

BERLIN — As European leaders gather in Brussels on Thursday for a two-day summit aimed at resolving the Eurozone's debt crisis, German Chancellor Angela Merkel's response to the most aggressive proposal pushed by her neighbors is, in essence: Over my dead body.

With borrowing costs for Spain and Italy approaching unsustainable levels, European Union leaders have stepped up their pressure on Germany to accept solutions it has long resisted. But Merkel, whose country has Europe's largest economy and probably will foot the highest share of the bill for rescuing its struggling neighbors, has dug in her heels.

In response to the widespread call for euro bonds, which would allow European countries to issue debt jointly and could ease the cost of borrowing for highly indebted southern European countries, Merkel said Tuesday that full debt sharing would not occur "as long as I live."

[//articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/27/world/la-fg-euro-summit-germany-20120628]Germany leader opposes full debt sharing in Eurozone crisis - Los Angeles Times[/url]
=>

Indians account for 20% of Britain's ultra-rich club
June 19, 2012

Super-rich Indians account for more than 20% of the wealth of ultra-high net worth (UHNW) individuals in Britain, a new list showed on Tuesday. As a national group, they are second only to expat Russians. :ranger:

[hindustantimes.com/news-feed/chunk-ht-ui-businesssectionpage-corporate/indians-account-for-22-of-britain-s-ultra-rich-club/article1-875096.aspx#sthash.sFkQCOHH.dpuf]Indians account for 22% of Britain's ultra-rich club - Hindustan Times]
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
I work in EU-Russia cross border programs, the will to integrate is great, but it is like trying to mix oil with water. Russia is one of the worst corrupt countries in the world and EU is less corrupt place in the world. The problems are everywhere, but the will is there.
The Russians will be better off keeping their identity and culture. I oppose Russian mixing with West Europeans.

Let Russians make Russia a great country with own effort.

Russians have everything in their genes. They just need to use their brains.
 

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
The Russian state exists for the benefit of Putin and just over 100 of his cronies. This is a kleptocracy. They steal the wealth of the nation for themselves and keep the vast majority of the population poor. It is a mafia state. Bribery alone totals an estimated $300bn a year. This is worse than the Czars or communism.
Russia had a chance at democracy. Putin stole this. He knows the result of every election before it happens. Bussing people from polling station to polling station is just one small tactic. Russia is a shamocracy with Putin and his cronies exercising all the power


Is Putin the worst thing to happen to Russia? • Bruce On Politics
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
The Russian state exists for the benefit of Putin and just over 100 of his cronies. This is a kleptocracy. They steal the wealth of the nation for themselves and keep the vast majority of the population poor. It is a mafia state. Bribery alone totals an estimated $300bn a year. This is worse than the Czars or communism.
Russia had a chance at democracy. Putin stole this. He knows the result of every election before it happens. Bussing people from polling station to polling station is just one small tactic. Russia is a shamocracy with Putin and his cronies exercising all the power


Is Putin the worst thing to happen to Russia? "¢ Bruce On Politics
The article quoted by you is written by a very suspicious man who has no credentials in the subject.

This is a typical disinformation.

You must present believable statistics like income levels, distribution of jobs industry-wise, growth/shrinkage of different industries etc under Putin.
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
Russia's Waning Soft Power in Central Asia

Allegedly, Russia invaded Ukraine because Russians and Russian speakers there were in danger of losing their cultural-political rights to a supposedly neo-Nazi, Fascist government there. Of course, these charges were wholly mendacious. But they do highlight the salience of Russian language use in the countries of the Russian diaspora of the former Soviet Union as having a direct bearing on the security of those states. Indeed, a 2009 Russian law that Russian President Vladimir Putin directly invoked to justify the invasion of Crimea permits the Russian president to order troops into other countries to uphold the "honor and dignity" of Russians and Russian speakers if it is being violated. Given that, it should be clear that linguistic policy in Central Asian countries is a matter of the utmost importance, requiring considerable subtlety on the part of Central Asian leaders.

Nevertheless it has been clear for some time, and recent news reports confirm it, that the Russian language is steadily losing ground in Central Asia in educational institutions and in much of the media throughout Central Asia. To be sure, Moscow is trying to counter this, for instance with recent attempts to saturate the Kazakh media. Yet this trend towards establishing the primacy of national cultures and languages at the expense of Russian builds on twenty years of steady nationalization of the culture of these states as a matter of deliberate policy, on their deliberate efforts to maintain an openness to the larger globalizing trends in the world economy, and on a generation of growing restrictions on Russian language use in broadcasting and other media.

Of course, Central Asian leaders will not publicly attack the use of Russian language or create situations that could tempt Moscow to intervene in Central Asia on the same pretexts as it employed in Ukraine. But while the invasion of Ukraine created and still generates considerable anxiety in Central Asia, the crisis that Russia faces as a result of its action makes intervention in Central Asia a less likely prospect for the foreseeable future. Given the steep economic decline Russia has experienced following its Ukrainian adventure a third front on top of Ukraine and the North Caucasus is the last thing Moscow seeks. Nonetheless, leaders like Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev point with pride to the growth of Kazakh as the native language and more younger students are preferring English or Chinese to Russian.

In Kyrgyzstan, a recent report showed different forces at work but similar outcomes. The poverty of the Kyrgyz school system means that despite Russian claims of large-scale support for Russian-language teaching abroad, means that only 11 percent of Kyrgyz students are going to superior Russian schools in that republic. Students otherwise are not learning Russian and competent teachers are hard to find. All this, of course, generates a vicious cycle. Similarly, in December 2013, Veniamin Kaganov, Russia's deputy education minister, was quoted in Tass as saying that the number of Russian speakers had fallen by 100 million since the break up of the Soviet Union. Neither is this outcome unique to Kyrgyzstan or Central Asia. Although globalization certainly plays a role here, all these states have taken serious policy steps since 1991 to create a stronger sense of national identity among their peoples, a policy line that inevitably translates into privileging native languages over Russian and English and now Chinese over it as well.

This outcome strongly suggests that while state support for the propagation of he Russian language abroad is a point in Russia's 2009 national security strategy, Moscow is apparently steadily if somewhat unobtrusively failing to achieve its goals. And this testifies to a continuing failure to actualize Russia's soft power despite an enormous state investment. The manifestations of this failure may be quiet and not immediately visible but they do point to the steady erosion over time of Russian power of all kinds in Central Asia, although its military capabilities there remain potentially formidable.

Moreover, Central Asian states have proven to be rather more adroit that was expected at defending themselves against Russian encroachments. Nazarbayev even publicly threatened to leave the Eurasian Economic Union, the centerpiece of Putin's grand design when Putin made threatening statements about Kazakhstan's former lack of statehood. Similarly, in Uzbekistan a 2013 decree by President Islam Karimov mandated the teaching of English in first grade and Russian in second grade, a sure sign of his priorities and that of the state. Non-Uzbek schools in the republic, Tajik, Kyrgyz, and Kazakh have also cut their teaching of Russian while increasing English language instruction. Thus the Russian language is steadily being marginalized in Uzbekistan as well.

It is by no means clear what Rusisa can do about this. Its economy, even before the recent sanctions and crisis, was sputtering and its record of follow through on implementing its grandiose decrees and plans is quite poor. Moreover, these states are clearly determined to ensure and consolidate the primacy of the native language narrative across all dimensions of its use and to defend their national security and integrity to the fullest short of war. Moreover, it is quite clear that Russia, even at its best times, lacks the capacity to deploy soft power on the requisite scale in Central Asia and win the support either of the local governments or the population. In some states, such as Turkmenistan, migration back to Russia has long since begun because of an increasingly inhospitable socioeconomic if not cultural environment. So while Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan will not directly challenge Moscow here, they will proceed by other means to strengthen their own national identity at the expense of the past Russian supremacy in culture and politics. Russian culture will hardly disappear anytime soon from Central Asia but it is steadily losing ground and will increasingly be more of a historical relic than a working alternative except in certain specific environments. English and Chinese, especially as China keeps building Confucius Institutes and consolidates its primacy as Central Asia' main commercial partner, will displace Russian. And increasingly it appears that under the circumstances there is not much Moscow can do about it.
Russia's Waning Soft Power in Central Asia | The Diplomat
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,566
Country flag
The Russian state exists for the benefit of Putin and just over 100 of his cronies. This is a kleptocracy. They steal the wealth of the nation for themselves and keep the vast majority of the population poor. It is a mafia state. Bribery alone totals an estimated $300bn a year. This is worse than the Czars or communism.
Russia had a chance at democracy. Putin stole this. He knows the result of every election before it happens. Bussing people from polling station to polling station is just one small tactic. Russia is a shamocracy with Putin and his cronies exercising all the power


Is Putin the worst thing to happen to Russia? "¢ Bruce On Politics
Kleptocracy and shamocracy 2 new words. Lol
 

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
Kleptocracy and shamocracy 2 new words. Lol
Yes, sadly that is all Russia can now contribute to the world. I spent new year with my Russian friends: a teacher in Russia earns 300€ and a teacher in Finland 3000€ a month. They live only 100km apart. What else can you call their model than Kleptocracy? Elite stoles and people live in poverty.
 

jouni

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
3,900
Likes
1,138
Kleptocracy and shamocracy 2 new words. Lol
Yes, sadly that is all Russia can now contribute to the world. I spent new year with my Russian friends: a teacher in Russia earns 300€ and a teacher in Finland 3000€ a month. They live only 100km apart. What else can you call their model than Kleptocracy? Elite stoles and people live in poverty.

Russia spends 37% of budget to defence and security, Finland 7%. F*****g idiots.Still we can give them a bllody nose if they try something.


https://ammattisotilas.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/ilmasodan-lyhyt-oppimaara/

Hornet's main opponent, the Su-27 - equipment and its different versions have been in use in Russia depending on the source of 260 - 300 machines. Russia will not under any circumstances be able to group all its fleet to a single operation direction, because the country's territorial integrity must be safeguarded also other borders. Let us assume in this line of thought, that the Su-27 - equipment (based on 280 plane) is the event of war the Finnish front 60%. These airworthy calculate 80%. Hornets are therefore faced with 134 modern fighter jets. Since air travel in red air force is longer and the fighters may have to bomb and assault machines with a re-arming the country is slow, calculated flight performance engines 3 / day. Red fighter equipment is thus capable of 400 war take a day.

The air battle in Finland blue Air Force in a position to approximately sixty percent of red fighter combat flight volume. The stock is fairly even level, the difference will be covered by better training, as well as land and air merisijoitteisella save. In any case, even a simple volumes shows that we are not so outnumbered than you might think
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top