Right to Education

[Bachchu Yadav]

The Parliament makes laws

The implementation is LEFT to the state govts

State govts get funds but funds are used for some other purposes

The EXAMPLES are MNREGA NRHM Right to food and RTE

I know ,MNREGA and coming right to food are legal right.

Now you tell me , Is RTE a legal right or Fundamental right ?

 

[pankaj nema]

Till a CHILD can go the court and demand and GET free education it is JUST a LEGAL Right

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

Till a CHILD can go the court and demand and GET free education it is JUST a LEGAL Right

You are fleeing as not to answer it. You are a coward or answer that.

What does our constituition say ? Is RTE a legal right or fundamental right ?

 

[pankaj nema]

Just making a law under the Article 21 proves nothing

Article 21 is a Very broad article

But it doe s not PROVIDE PROTECTION to an INDIVIDUAL like other Fundamental rights

 

[panduranghari]

The Govt has DESERTED Both QUALITY Education and Health sectors

All it provides is poor quality schools and poor quality hospitals

Yeah Yeah I know about IIMs and IITs

I am talking of basic school education

And it wants the private sector to pick up the tab

And I have to pay EDUCATION CESS

Actually IIM and IIT are not that good either. They are better than rest in India, but they are not at international standards. Getting into IIT is not difficult if you go to private institutes in Bihar UP for tuitions.

 

[pankaj nema]

1) The right to go abroad.
(2) The right to privacy.
(3) The right against solitary confinement.
(4) The right against hand cuffing.
(5) The right against delayed execution.
(6) The right to shelter.
(7) The right against custodial death.
(8) The right against public hanging.
(9) Doctors assistance.

These are SOME other Rights CONFERRED by your Article 21

 

[pankaj nema]

Article 21 is BLAH BLAH BLAH

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

Just making a law under the Article 21 proves nothing

Article 21 is a Very broad article

But it doe s not PROVIDE PROTECTION to an INDIVIDUAL like other Fundamental rights

Now RTE is not mere extension of Right to life and personal dignity that Article 21.

RTE has a separate article 21(A) by 86th constitutional amendment act.

Now eat your words back and tell your answer : Is RTE a legal right or constitutional right ?

 

[pankaj nema]

All welfare RIGHTS such as RTE etc are put under Article 21 to give an impression
that the Citizen is very empowered

But if you know the reality of life in India ......

 

[pankaj nema]

Article 21 Of The Constitution Of India - The Expanding Horizons - Author - Vidhan Maheshwari

Read ALL about the Much VAUNTED Article 21

 

[Yusuf]

RTE is now a fundamental right under right to freedom. But then tell me about one right that has been in place in true spirit.

For me, the implementation is wrong not the idea. Education is key to solve a lot of problems. But then it cannot be at the expense of others.

We are not building institutions. Mere subsidies will not help.

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

All welfare RIGHTS such as RTE etc are put under Article 21 to give an impression
that the Citizen is very empowered

But if you know the reality of life in India ......

Your knowledge is really pathetic.

Article 21 and Article 21(A) are two separate articles.

Read 86th constitutional amendment act and then eat your words back.

Now answer it if you have guts : Is RTE a legal right or fundamental right ?

 

[pankaj nema]

http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/art222.htm

Read ALL about the Much VAUNTED Article 21

I am deliberating reposting my earlier post because this Bachchu is SELECTIVELY replying
to my posts and has conveniently left out my earlier post which proves the HOLLOWNESS
of Article 21

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/art222.htm]Article 21 Of The Constitution Of India - The Expanding Horizons - Author - Vidhan Maheshwari[/url]

Read ALL about the Much VAUNTED Article 21

I am deliberating reposting my earlier post because this Bachchu is SELECTIVELY replying
to my posts and has conveniently left out my earlier post which proves the HOLLOWNESS
of Article 21

I know about article 21 . Earlier RTE was a inferred right under right to life ,that is article 21 . In 2002 , by 86th amendment Act government has introduced another article in in Part 3 of constitution. that is article 21(A).

And Now answer it .

What our constitution says ? Is RTE a legal right or Fundamental right ?

 

[pankaj nema]

Article 21 A is also NOTHING

Because it EXTENDS the right of LIFE and includes in its ambit the Right to education

Just a Sophisticated juggling of words

 

[Yusuf]

Please take this to another thread to see of its legal or constitutional. It's distracting from the real issue at hand.

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

Read that Now with all your cowardliness and answer my question

file:///E:/rema/COI/ic1ONS86.txt

 

[pankaj nema]

Bachchu you are an idiot

The DRAFT of the BILL presented in the Parliament is never passed as it is presented

Read the FINAL ACT that was passed in 2009 by the Parliament

 

[Bachchu Yadav]

Article 21 A is also NOTHING

Because it EXTENDS the right of LIFE and includes in its ambit the Right to education

Just a Sophisticated juggling of words

Don't be another supreme court. Today itself Supreme court has validated article 21 A

I'm not asking how Article 21 A perform. Even almost all the fundamental right is an extension of Article 21.

I'm asking ? Is RTE a legal right or fundamental right ? ANSWER this.

 

[pankaj nema]

Bachchuji the link you have posted is just a HALF PAGE SUMMARY

It is not even the entire bill

First you POST the entire RTE ACT that was passed by the parliament and then talk