You wont care about bottomline until you realize that in 1980-2000 headlines on front page used to be:The Actual Bottom line is
"WE NEED PEOPLE TO KILL !! OK !! get it ?? !!"
The Headline which i'll prefer isYou wont care about bottomline until you realize that in 1980-2000 headlines on front page used to be:
Indian people and Soldier's Sacrifice their live in terror attacks in india , and western media is silent
from 9/11/2001 you are reading:
US Soldier's Sacrifice in Afghanistan, and Pakistani media's silence
"
Now which headline you'll prefer choice is yours.
20 yrs hence headlines will be "dus kadam hindostan khatam"The Headline which i'll prefer is
"20 years since the end of Pakistani Terrorism , Trade between India Pakistan is at all time High "
20 yrs hence headlines will be "dus kadam hindostan khatam"
I thought alcohol and weed are haram in your religion woman, specially for women20 yrs hence headlines will be "dus kadam hindostan khatam"
In Mumbay those who were found and killed / apprehended were damn Pakistanies. So India should clear Pakistnies first and then look for the US. You can point fingers at anyone but that does not absolve the Pakistani terrorists unless you are implying that those were actually mercenaries hired by CIA.First ask usa to come clean on david headley then change the bottomline.
I propose peace and you propose this ^20 yrs hence headlines will be "dus kadam hindostan khatam"
Ha Ha Ha ... what a poor joke !20 yrs hence headlines will be "dus kadam hindostan khatam"
I'm pointing the same.David headley being double agent is the story you got from usa not by questioning the david headley himself.unless india get full access to david headley usa's role in 26/11 is equally suspicious as pakistan.This is when Raw agent ravinder singh deffected to usa with CIA's help.And this is when usa destroyed Mumbai blasts evidence to help pakistan.In Mumbay those who were found and killed / apprehended were damn Pakistanies. So India should clear Pakistnies first and then look for the US. You can point fingers at anyone but that does not absolve the Pakistani terrorists unless you are implying that those were actually mercenaries hired by CIA.
It is sufficiently proved that David Headley is of Pakistani origin and desirous of having virgins in heaven having failed in this world, is a frustrated jihadist by indoctrination and training in Pakistan and has been helping LeT. Every evidence shouts Pakisatan..... Jile Jile Pakistan.... Hile Hile Pakistan..... ab to bacha hai Bakistan .. sab kuchh le gaya Hindustan.I'm pointing the same.David headley being double agent is the story you got from usa not by questioning the david headley himself.unless india get full access to david headley usa's role in 26/11 is equally suspicious as pakistan.This is when Raw agent ravinder singh deffected to usa with CIA's help.And this is when usa destroyed Mumbai blasts evidence to help pakistan.
you mean you got full excess to David headley ??I'm pointing the same.David headley being double agent is the story you got from usa not by questioning the david headley himself.unless india get full access to david headley usa's role in 26/11 is equally suspicious as pakistan.This is when Raw agent ravinder singh deffected to usa with CIA's help.And this is when usa destroyed Mumbai blasts evidence to help pakistan.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pak breaks all diplomatic relations with India | Members Corner | 13 | ||
India, Pak to hold talks on water-related issues | Foreign Relations | 5 | ||
India GCC Relations : News , Updates & Discussions. | International Politics | 25 | ||
Ammunition and related war stores in India | Defence & Strategy | 0 |