- Joined
- Aug 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,582
- Likes
- 2,538
we shouldnt be bothering with packland
whatever they get is from china and any contribution pack does is just superficial stuff
we should benchmark with china and with their serious econ situation coming up , that will make comparing with them all the more realistic as we will have a better chance of catching up ...that in itself will give pack some rattles ...... of course they will pretend to take it in stride.
@angeldude13@Abhijat@Ancient Indian@anupamsurey@aliyah @Alien@angeldude13@Abhijat@Ancient Indian@anupamsurey @aliyah @Alien @Aravind Sanjeev @A chauhan @asingh10 @asianobserve @BATTLE FIELD@bose @Bornubus @brational@blueblood@Blackwater@Blood+ @bhai-117
@Bangalorean @bengalraider @cobra commando @Chirag @Chris Jude @Chinmoy@Cadian @DingDong@ersakthivel @FRYCRY @guru-dutt@Hari Sud@hit&run @HeinzGud @indiandefencefan @I_PLAY_BAD @Indian Devil @Indibomber @Jangaruda @jackprince@Kunal @Kshatriya87 Biswas@LETHALFORCE@laughingbuddha @mhk99 @maomao @Neil @Nicky G @OneGrimPilgrim@pmaitra @PaliwalWarrior @Pulkit @Rowdy@Razor@Rashna @[email protected] @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @Srinivas_K @sunnyv @sgarg@sabari @Sameet2 @saik @sorcerer @sydsnyper @Sridevi @SREEKAR @TejasMK3@The enlightened
@tejas warrior@tharun@thethinker@tsunami@Screambowl @Sylex21 @VIP @Vishwarupa @Vishal Guts @Yusuf@Yumdoot @Zebra
in keeping with the good spirit displayed by member @Neo, i have modified my post accordingly
he has acknowledged pakistans limited present role which they hope to expand in future .....thats realistic enough for me .....meanwhile as i suggested, we benchmark with china and forget packland
whatever they get is from china and any contribution pack does is just superficial stuff
we should benchmark with china and with their serious econ situation coming up , that will make comparing with them all the more realistic as we will have a better chance of catching up ...that in itself will give pack some rattles ...... of course they will pretend to take it in stride.
@angeldude13@Abhijat@Ancient Indian@anupamsurey@aliyah @Alien@angeldude13@Abhijat@Ancient Indian@anupamsurey @aliyah @Alien @Aravind Sanjeev @A chauhan @asingh10 @asianobserve @BATTLE FIELD@bose @Bornubus @brational@blueblood@Blackwater@Blood+ @bhai-117
@Bangalorean @bengalraider @cobra commando @Chirag @Chris Jude @Chinmoy@Cadian @DingDong@ersakthivel @FRYCRY @guru-dutt@Hari Sud@hit&run @HeinzGud @indiandefencefan @I_PLAY_BAD @Indian Devil @Indibomber @Jangaruda @jackprince@Kunal @Kshatriya87 Biswas@LETHALFORCE@laughingbuddha @mhk99 @maomao @Neil @Nicky G @OneGrimPilgrim@pmaitra @PaliwalWarrior @Pulkit @Rowdy@Razor@Rashna @[email protected] @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @Srinivas_K @sunnyv @sgarg@sabari @Sameet2 @saik @sorcerer @sydsnyper @Sridevi @SREEKAR @TejasMK3@The enlightened
@tejas warrior@tharun@thethinker@tsunami@Screambowl @Sylex21 @VIP @Vishwarupa @Vishal Guts @Yusuf@Yumdoot @Zebra
in keeping with the good spirit displayed by member @Neo, i have modified my post accordingly
he has acknowledged pakistans limited present role which they hope to expand in future .....thats realistic enough for me .....meanwhile as i suggested, we benchmark with china and forget packland
Pakistan lacks funds and an industrial eco-system to develop a fighter from scratch. Therefor we have a time tested friend who does have all we need and she's more than willing to function as our workshop, share required expertise and transfer technology.
Pakistan's defence infrastructure lacks transparency for good reasons and only a few privileged ones have full knowledge of the project.
AFAIK PAF's dedicated engineering team has been involved from day one as we wanted to transfer our expertise into the JF-17 and we did a great job working with Chinese engineers who patiently respected our ASR and gave their full cooperation.
It doesn't matter what % is contributed by Pakistan, what matters is that China is transferring full ToT to PAC Kamra. The JF-17 will gradually be locally produced and overhauled and it is not vulnerable to embargoes...........
Last edited: