Poland starts own F-16 Viper Maintenance Center

Discussion in 'Military Aviation' started by SajeevJino, Mar 12, 2013.

  1. SajeevJino

    SajeevJino Long walk Elite Member

    Feb 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Inside a Cage
    Poland starts own F-16 Viper Maintenance Center


    48 F-16 C/D Block 52+s were purchased in order to replace the obsolete ex-Warsaw Pact MiG-21s, Mig-23s, Mig-29s and other fighters (the only remaining jets in the Polish Air Force are TS-11s of the aerobatic team, Su-22s – soon to be replaced – possibly with UCAVs).

    Regardless of that fact they still had to be serviced in the US as Poland did not have qualified personnel to do that. This is going to change very soon.

    The Military Aviation Service Facility (Wojskowe Zakłady Lotnicze nr 2) in Bydgoszcz has a new department – National F-16 Servicing centre.

    It is the 6th facility of that kind in Europe, making Poland somewhat unique in this respect. The other countries in Europe that are able to service Vipers on their own are Greece, Belgium, Turkey, Denmark and Portugal.

    Two year contract that was signed by the facility may not seem impressive, as the money involved is only 4 Million Euro, but it took 10 years to prepare the center for full scope of F-16 maintenance.

    Long training programme provided by Lockheed Martin had to be executed. Nevertheless it was logistically comfortable for the Polish workers, as it took place not in the US but in Bydgoszcz, on site. This choice reduced the costs and increased the speed of training.

    The scope of activity for the servicing center is to provide experience to the ground crews in the F-16 bases (Krzesiny, Łask) and to carry out any repairs that are impossible to complete on the mother-airfield

    The Aviationist » Poland starts own F-16 Viper Maintenance Center
  3. Damian

    Damian Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Aug 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    False information, we still have MiG-29's + of course Su-22's and F-16's.

    Rest of informations is more or less correct.
    SajeevJino likes this.

Share This Page